The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Shame On Cyprus / Sleeping Rough for Justice

Feel free to talk about anything that you want.

Postby pantheman » Tue Jul 15, 2008 3:40 pm

Feisty wrote:
Magnus wrote:
Feisty wrote:
Magnus wrote:These are the actions of governments. What does Joe Public actually do when he hears of things like this? Nothing. It's the same for any case you can think of. When people lose their homes from typhoons or earthquakes, we see the disaster and feel sorry for the people, but not many of us give to a charity or go and help the victims. Again, it's not a lack of awareness, it's a lack of willpower to do anything because it's not 'our problem'.

The world knows about the Cyprus Problem. It's just that the world doesn't want to help because it has it's own problems.


You'll have to speak for yourself there Magnus. Personally I do a lot of charity work and give £100 to an African charity.
Then again I'd have to say I haven't seen much in the way of charity work in Cyprus. Perhaps I just wasn't looking.


I'm sorry, I didn't make myself clear. I wasn't saying 'we' as in 'you or me personally'. I meant that people in general, your average person in the street, do very little if anything at all when they see all the disasters or political problems in the world. Obviously some people are different but the vast majority are too tied up with their own lives and problems.

I've been on lots of the marches and protests for the Cyprus Problem and I can tell you that the vast majority of people that were there or interested in supporting the cause were Cypriots and people related to Cypriots. Average Joe just stared, but that's fair enough, while others were more than happy to shout abuse and mock the crying mothers carrying pictures of their missing loved ones.

Again, it's not lack of awareness, it's lack of will or interest.

Conor is fortunate because he is taking his protest to the streets of England where he can get the support of the other Brits who have suffered the same. If he does a good enough job, he can even convince other Brits that all Cypriots are evil fraudsters. Emphasising the racial divide is always good for stirring up support.

Try doing that in a country where you're the foreigner, like the Cypriots protesting in the UK, and it's a totally different thing. Let's see him take his protests to the streets of Cyprus.


My personal opinion would be that if Cypriots were to protest PEACEFULLY at the Turkish embassy they would not encounter any hatred from the authorities, would bring more publicity to their cause, which I still maintain is a total mystery to a majority of people, and am sure they would not have to endure threats against them by faceless strangers on a forum.


Feisty,

FYI, the cypriots do protest outside the Turkish embassy in london, or at least used to. Up until not long ago my uncle was part of a revolving group that camped out 24 hrs / day in a makeshift tent and a fire. This went on for ages, but I am not sure if it still does. The publicity has got them jack, and the cyprob is still there 34 years on. Its not a case on not trying. Its not all forum protesting the Cypriots in london and elsewhere do have these protests regularly, but it has not made a blind bit of difference.

This has nothing to do with the conor case, but just to reply to your posts regarding non protesting of the Turkish embassy by the GC. They do. If you can get shot for climbing a flag pole and beaten to death for protesting, then imagine what could happen by doing this in the North, its not really practical is it? i am sure you know that. its like asking a group of protestants to go into a catholic area and ask the IRA to leave, I will leave you to imagine the consequence.

Good luck against P. though :wink:
User avatar
pantheman
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1553
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 1:21 pm

Postby Oracle » Tue Jul 15, 2008 3:40 pm

Yeah why would anyone make charges, moan the legal system is too slow and yet fail to appear in court?.... Curious?

But I am still wondering about who might be Conor's MP ? :? ... as I would have expected them to have backed me up if I had a genuine grievance IMHO
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby Feisty » Tue Jul 15, 2008 3:42 pm

CBBB wrote:So we still don't know why conor never went to court.


Well as I said previously, I'm not aware that there has been any court hearing. Neither of us can say more than that so it's useless conjecture.
Feisty
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 743
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 2:13 pm

Postby Feisty » Tue Jul 15, 2008 3:44 pm

pantheman wrote:
Feisty wrote:
Magnus wrote:
Feisty wrote:
Magnus wrote:These are the actions of governments. What does Joe Public actually do when he hears of things like this? Nothing. It's the same for any case you can think of. When people lose their homes from typhoons or earthquakes, we see the disaster and feel sorry for the people, but not many of us give to a charity or go and help the victims. Again, it's not a lack of awareness, it's a lack of willpower to do anything because it's not 'our problem'.

The world knows about the Cyprus Problem. It's just that the world doesn't want to help because it has it's own problems.


You'll have to speak for yourself there Magnus. Personally I do a lot of charity work and give £100 to an African charity.
Then again I'd have to say I haven't seen much in the way of charity work in Cyprus. Perhaps I just wasn't looking.


I'm sorry, I didn't make myself clear. I wasn't saying 'we' as in 'you or me personally'. I meant that people in general, your average person in the street, do very little if anything at all when they see all the disasters or political problems in the world. Obviously some people are different but the vast majority are too tied up with their own lives and problems.

I've been on lots of the marches and protests for the Cyprus Problem and I can tell you that the vast majority of people that were there or interested in supporting the cause were Cypriots and people related to Cypriots. Average Joe just stared, but that's fair enough, while others were more than happy to shout abuse and mock the crying mothers carrying pictures of their missing loved ones.

Again, it's not lack of awareness, it's lack of will or interest.

Conor is fortunate because he is taking his protest to the streets of England where he can get the support of the other Brits who have suffered the same. If he does a good enough job, he can even convince other Brits that all Cypriots are evil fraudsters. Emphasising the racial divide is always good for stirring up support.

Try doing that in a country where you're the foreigner, like the Cypriots protesting in the UK, and it's a totally different thing. Let's see him take his protests to the streets of Cyprus.


My personal opinion would be that if Cypriots were to protest PEACEFULLY at the Turkish embassy they would not encounter any hatred from the authorities, would bring more publicity to their cause, which I still maintain is a total mystery to a majority of people, and am sure they would not have to endure threats against them by faceless strangers on a forum.


Feisty,

FYI, the cypriots do protest outside the Turkish embassy in london, or at least used to. Up until not long ago my uncle was part of a revolving group that camped out 24 hrs / day in a makeshift tent and a fire. This went on for ages, but I am not sure if it still does. The publicity has got them jack, and the cyprob is still there 34 years on. Its not a case on not trying. Its not all forum protesting the Cypriots in london and elsewhere do have these protests regularly, but it has not made a blind bit of difference.

This has nothing to do with the conor case, but just to reply to your posts regarding non protesting of the Turkish embassy by the GC. They do. If you can get shot for climbing a flag pole and beaten to death for protesting, then imagine what could happen by doing this in the North, its not really practical is it? i am sure you know that. its like asking a group of protestants to go into a catholic area and ask the IRA to leave, I will leave you to imagine the consequence.

Good luck against P. though :wink:


Thanks for that Pantheman. Pity no one saw fit to say so earlier. I'd hazard a guess that most of them don't even know.

Oh and never in a million years would I suggest they try anything in the north or in Turkey itself. Knife crime may be rampant in London at the moment but Istanbul has long since had a far more fearsome reputation for knife wielding individuals. I myself was a victim of an attempted mugging there in 1997 and had to stop my husband chasing the perpretators down an alleyway.
Last edited by Feisty on Tue Jul 15, 2008 3:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Feisty
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 743
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 2:13 pm

Postby Paphitis » Tue Jul 15, 2008 3:45 pm

Feisty wrote:
Oracle wrote:
craigbeck wrote:Conor I think you may have lost the plot a little, fueled by your anger. Personally I think you are legally in the right (from what I have read and heard) but getting increasingly insulting towards the whole nation of Cyprus is not going to help you. I work in a public serving role and let me tell you direct selling to the general public is a thankless task, despite your best efforts people complain and insult you. I am sure you are painting a very one sided view of things, your developers are big on the east coast and must have many happy clients. If they were out to profit from defrauding people on a grand scale why would they just pick on you, why not everyone who bought a house from them. I think you were a little green in assuming the buying process would be the same as in the UK, this is Cyprus and things work the Cypriot way (love it or hate it). I think you will win in the end BUT you could damage your chances with the broad sword approach.


Having seen a little of the other side now, I think maybe Conor may have been told his case is not as cut and dry as he may have wished to have portrayed it ...

There is an affidavit on this site that someone posted:
http://www.karayiannas.com.cy/page.php

Maybe this apparent dig at Cyprus might be a last ditch, further attempt at gaining some money perhaps through pester power IMHO .... Who knows?

But I am still waiting to hear who Conor's MP might be ....


And why on earth do you think the developer beat him up and put him in hospital Oracle?
Conor maintains that this affidavit is full of lies and he can prove it to be so. Many of you seem to want to try and convict Conor when he has not committed any crime at all.
All he wants to do is get his case heard in a court of law so that the rights and wrongs can be decided by the people qualified to do so, after hearing and seeing all the evidence.


The affidavit from Karayiannis, at the very least casts significant doubt on Connor's claims. I am not saying that everything within that affidavit may be correct, but Karrayiannis does claim that he has offered a full refund of Connors payments + interest. This seems to be a very fair compromise which does not disadvantage Connor as far as financial loss on capital is concerned. It also seems evident that Karayiannis, by making this offer is very eager to end this saga, as no doubt his business has suffered from the bad publicity. Why on earth did Connor refuse to accept this offer which would save all involved the stress and heartache of legal proceedings? This seems to indicate that Connor may only be interested in milking the developer or blackmailing him to pay much more (300,000 pounds) by holding his business at ransom. He now resorts to holding the nation of Cyprus at ransom, especially since Karragiannis is mounting quite a reasonable and valid defence.

As stated earlier, this case is not clear cut. Connor is not as innocent as he likes to think. The mere fact that he defaulted on this legally binding payments is further evidence of this. He does not own the property in Frenaros as he has not paid for it in full. He merely has the property under contract. And Karragiannis has every right to be upset as his own capital is tied up in that property.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Postby Feisty » Tue Jul 15, 2008 3:51 pm

As I said earlier, and would be Conor's response I think, if it were heard in court there would be an end to it all.

All I know is that on many occasions Conor has stated that the offer of a refund was either not made or was withdrawn as quickly as it was made ( I really am not sure on this so please don't attribute this to Conor)

And as for his capital being tied up, surely he's received payment twice so has no money tied up. This property has subsequently been sold to someone who occupies it but does not even have the Land Register entry. Presumably they have also paid for it.
Feisty
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 743
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 2:13 pm

Postby boomerang » Tue Jul 15, 2008 3:53 pm

I agree with paphitis on this one...

I asked the same question to conor, and what he is offering is hear say with no evidence...with the exemption of silly videos and a lot of hear say, while the builder is on record with the offer...

Conor wrote:
boomerang wrote:Why didn't you finish the house and put it on the market?...But stopping payment is breach of contract...even if you stood to lose a few quid it would have been a better outcome....or maybe you could have made a bit of profit by selling it...


That question alone says you know nothing about my case. Your browser is stuck in this forum.

“I refer the honourable gentleman to the answer I gave some moments ago.”




2:05 seconds onwards is the answer to that question.


Conor cut the crap with the silly mickey mouse videos that include silly pictures of planes and cartoons...

you are a bloody drama queen...
User avatar
boomerang
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7337
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 5:56 am

Postby Feisty » Tue Jul 15, 2008 3:59 pm

I am at present reading the affadavit and make the first point

I am puzzled that a planning application was made just for Conor's house and not for the full development as I believe is normal. That is not normal practice at all.

Is it not that permission is given en block for a development and then when the whole development is finished there is a final inspection to ensure the original application has been adherred to?
Feisty
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 743
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 2:13 pm

Postby Oracle » Tue Jul 15, 2008 4:01 pm

Things are done in stages aren't they?
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby Feisty » Tue Jul 15, 2008 4:01 pm

Secondly, in point 20 he quite clearly criticises Conor's lawyer and seems to lay the blame for Conor's initial plight at his door.

Why on earth did he then take this lawyer as his own if he is so confident of the lawyers inefficiency?
Feisty
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 743
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 2:13 pm

PreviousNext

Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest