Oracle wrote:Feisty wrote:Oracle wrote:Conor wrote:IMPORTANT NOTE: NOTHING CONCERNING THE NORTH WILL BE ALLOWED ON MY WEBSITE. WE BOUGHT WITHIN THE EU. YOU START YOUR OWN WEBSITE FOR THAT ISSUE.
Goodnight
Yes, but why did you feel the need to say you were taking refuge in an illegally occupied unrecognized (for legal reasons) pseudo state in one of your above posts, Conor?
Are you perhaps being offered any incentives by them for these seemingly anti-Cypriot actions?
I'd imagine he feels safer in the north Oracle having been attacked on two occasion in the south and not in a random attack.
Well Feisty, this is an opinions forum and Connor has come here inviting opinions based on what he is prepared to present to us.
But he can't stop people reading between the lines and putting two and two together with the snippets that we can manage to view. I understand we do not have the whole story.
But i believe Connor also should understand that some people are more curious than others and do not just swallow what he wants us to.
Some of us may think about these pieces of the jigsaw puzzle, and move them round our heads to see how best they fit and not necessarily how we are told they should fit.
To me this is like some giant riddle, and I am trying to make sense of it.
I do not like the picture that emerges.
My concerns are now that Connor may be receiving incentives from the north to damage the image of Cyprus. It's just my view based on the incomplete picture that we are presented with. I have asked direct questions before and I am fed up with being lambasted and realise I will not get any answers other than what Connor is prepared to tell us and that is fine so long as he then also does not expect us to believe his conclusions as final, on the matter IMHO.
I hope whoever is dealing with the potential damage that in my opinion Connor seems intent on causing Cyprus, looks into this possibility of possible encouragement from the north and real justice can be served ....
boomerang wrote:I for one I am not condoning the seriousnes of the case...But there is the correct way and the wrong way to go about it...
What Conner and others are doing are harming the case...blind freddie can see this...
The best thing is to stop encouraging such a behaviour, feisty, coz if the case turns a turn for the worse, Conner will be left holding his balls in his hands while you have nothing to lose...Now you get it?
You ain't helping him...try and think about it...
Maynard23 wrote:I think Conor might be better off sleeping rough down around the back streets of Kings Cross, the punters are not so fussy in that location and judging by the trash we have attracted here, they might do a little better in that area.
Feisty wrote:boomerang wrote:I for one I am not condoning the seriousnes of the case...But there is the correct way and the wrong way to go about it...
What Conner and others are doing are harming the case...blind freddie can see this...
The best thing is to stop encouraging such a behaviour, feisty, coz if the case turns a turn for the worse, Conner will be left holding his balls in his hands while you have nothing to lose...Now you get it?
You ain't helping him...try and think about it...
I support his fight for justice and any legal avenues he takes to achieve it. I am a victim too and have already lost a considerable amount of money.
boomerang wrote:Feisty wrote:boomerang wrote:I for one I am not condoning the seriousnes of the case...But there is the correct way and the wrong way to go about it...
What Conner and others are doing are harming the case...blind freddie can see this...
The best thing is to stop encouraging such a behaviour, feisty, coz if the case turns a turn for the worse, Conner will be left holding his balls in his hands while you have nothing to lose...Now you get it?
You ain't helping him...try and think about it...
I support his fight for justice and any legal avenues he takes to achieve it. I am a victim too and have already lost a considerable amount of money.[/quote
Its all about winning Feisty...don't lose sight and stay focus...
Feisty wrote:
To a large extent Magnus we place our trust in 'our' lawyers who we only find out are often acting for the developer as well when a problem arises so at the very time we need to be able to rely on the law we find we are a victim of it by an unscrupulous lawyer who has never heard of the concept of conflict of interest, or indeed who has decided to totally disregard it as he knows the system is suspect (to say the least).
Conor wrote: May 2005 we were introduced to Karayiannas & Son Ltd by a buying agent in Cyprus. We made an offer on the house (CYP 163,000 including pool) and left a small deposit (CYP 1,000) to secure the price.
Conor wrote: June 2005 I return to Cyprus to check out the company, their build quality, site plan, and propose interior changes etc. I also found an independent solicitor that they have never dealt with to draw up the contract.
Conor wrote: August 2005 The contract is signed and deposited at the land registry for specific purpose. Our first installment of CYP 39,000 is paid.
perdike wrote:boomerang wrote:Feisty wrote:boomerang wrote:I for one I am not condoning the seriousnes of the case...But there is the correct way and the wrong way to go about it...
What Conner and others are doing are harming the case...blind freddie can see this...
The best thing is to stop encouraging such a behaviour, feisty, coz if the case turns a turn for the worse, Conner will be left holding his balls in his hands while you have nothing to lose...Now you get it?
You ain't helping him...try and think about it...
I support his fight for justice and any legal avenues he takes to achieve it. I am a victim too and have already lost a considerable amount of money.[/quote
Its all about winning Feisty...don't lose sight and stay focus...
GOD, VICTIMS . . . they make me sick . . (especially the self-proclaimed ones who become 'somebodies' through their "victimhood" . . and there are legions of the species these days!).
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests