MicAtCyp wrote:Still have doubts? Do you need more evidence?One cannot even refer to HIM wiithout using capital letters....
MicAtCyp, "Kemalism" has many meanings in Turkey and it's used differently by different people in Turkey. For me, Kemalism means modernity...Ataturk created a new modern, democratic republic out of an Islamic empire. Democracy was introduced, women's rights were introduced, Latin alphabet was introduced...You might argue that these were not successful and Turkey is still not European but that's not the point. The point is Ataturk had the vision of a European Turkey back in 1920s and Turkey stands as the only predominantly Muslim EU candidate country.
On the other hand, there are other "Kemalists" who interprets Ataturk's ideals differently and usually use violence. I call these "fake Kemalists" because they don't really understand what Ataturk stands for in my opinion. I think that's what comes into your mind (and Kifea's mind) when you talk of Kemalism but the existance of such people does not make Ataturk and his ideals less valuable.
You talked about communism. Isn't it a nice idea to have a state where every citizen gets exactly same education, exactly same healthcare, exactly same opportunities? Doesn't it bother you that some people are born rich and they go to best schools and they buy expensive cars while other people starve just because their parents are poor? So, in essence, isn't the idea of communism nice? Does one failed application of communism (USSR) make communism bad??