erolz wrote:Alexandros Lordos wrote:It would seem that the proposal that "all settlers should leave", is NOT unacceptable to TCs, so long as they are all re-housed, by Turkey, at their original place of residence. This of course will also require Turkey to live up to her own responsibilities vis-a-vis the Cyprus Problem ...
What defintion of 'settler' are you using here?
It includes everyone who came to Cyprus from Turkey after 1974, except those who intermarried with TCs and their offspring. So it includes BOTH the early wave of settlement, AND the more recent wave of "illegal workers"
erolz wrote:I personaly would be very unlikely to vote for such a settlement. I think this would be a betrayal of these people by the TRNC and am not sure I could be an active party to this kind of thing. Having said that I fear you may be right that a majority of TC would not share this view with me and would be willing to 'sacrafice' (as I see it) these people. Just my personal view.
About 40% of TCs would oppose such a settlement, according to my study, so you are not alone ...
As I said, it would have to be a difficult - and historic - compromise, in order to reach a settlement.
I also want to see these people being treated justly, and the more I think about it, the more it seems to me that this would be a just approach. These people came to Cyprus out of economic need, and surely they too miss their own original homeland. Just "kicking them out" would certainly be unfair, but if they can be given a new house at their original place of origin, that's a different story ...
If settlers remain, they will be treated like unwelcome third class citizens by the GCs. Inevitably tension and conflict would develop, the victims of which will be the settlers themselves. Why allow ourselves to descend into this bloodshed? So that we can defend the "principle" that "these people are to be protected", but without truly protecting them in the end?