The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


This is how the Annan Plan was vilified

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby Piratis » Fri Jul 11, 2008 6:49 am

Muzzy70 wrote:
Piratis wrote:
Greek-Cypriots are no more Greek than Americans are English!


Greek Cypriots are as Greek as any other Greek, and the only reason why we are not part of the Greek state is because this was denied to us.

Turks and British only won a battle in Cyprus. The war will never end until we win the right of freedom, self-determination and democracy on our own island.


Crikey, Parasite is on top form here folks ! He and his ilk keep on harping on about what Cypriots they are and he then effectively says that Greek Cypriots are Greek ! Leave the island then and join your fellow countrymen of Hellas.

I'll never forget a conversation that I had with a Greek girl from Selanik at university a few years ago. She said that like most Greeks she did not consider Greek Cypriots to be Greek. In fact she referred to them as, and I quote, 'Spoilt scum'. Says it all I guess.

By the way Bananiot is right. I'm not surprised he's been shot down by the Oxi lovers. Yes, extra attention was given to bringing Turkey and the TC's on side at the time of the previous negotiations prior to the referendum, but that was because a GC yes vote was taken as a given by the international community. The GC's had been harping on about re-unification for years and Papaplop gave a guarantee that he would deliver his community in a yes vote. Typically the two faced fascist reneged on this and cried his eyes out. The world was hoodwinked by your community's refusal to agree to the re-unification of Cyprus. I'm telling you now that over the next few years your refusal to accept the plan will be regarded as yet another 'disaster' that has befallen your community, one which like all of the others you could have prevented. I did not like certain elements of the Annan Plan but at least I had the political maturity to accept that at the end of the day it was a compromise, however bitter a pill. If you lot carry on wanting to eat all of the cake, then prepare for the next inevitable disaster for you, the recognition of the TRNC. I know I'll get a lot of the usual 'recognition's not going to happen' nonsensense and 'if we say no next time the TC's will continue to live in isolation' but wake up and see that we're coming to the end of a very long drawn out game whereby failure of the upcoming talks will lead to only one conclusion.

'Remove your life jacket and everything will be allright'.


Some Historical facts for you boy:

After 1400 B.C., Mycenaean and Mycenaean-Achaean traders from the northeastern Peloponnesus began regular commercial visits to the island. Settlers from the same areas arrived in large numbers toward the end of the Trojan War (traditionally dated about 1184 B.C.). Even in modern times, a strip of the northern coast was known as the Achaean Coast in commemoration of those early settlers. The newcomers spread the use of their spoken language and introduced a script that greatly facilitated commerce. They also introduced the potter's wheel and began producing pottery that eventually was carried by traders to many mainland markets. By the end of the second millennium B.C., a distinctive culture had developed on Cyprus. The island's culture was tempered and enriched by its position as a crossroads for the commerce of three continents, but in essence it was distinctively Hellenic.


In Cyprus the population is Greek like on every other Greek island, for 1000s of years. We speak Greek, we have Greek religion (Olympus Gods and then Orthodox Christianity) and we have a Greek culture. If you say that Cyprus is not Greek then Turkey is not Turkish and Enland is not English, since the culture/language of those people existed in the territories they currently occupy for far less time than we Greeks existed in Cyprus.

What is different in Cyprus than any other Greek island or the Greek mainland?

1) That it was occupied by various foreign rulers? No, the exact same thing happened to all other Greek territories.

2) That the Ottomans occupied Cyprus? No, the same happened to all other Greek islands and territories. In fact the Ottomans held Athens and most other Greek territories for a whole century more than they held Cyprus.

3) That a Muslim minority was created on the island during the Ottoman rule? No, the same happened in all other Greek islands and territories (and not only Greek, the Turks transferred their populations in all territories they conquered)

So what is different in Cyprus? The only difference is that we did not manage (yet) to liberate our Greek island from the foreign rulers. We started to fight for our right for freedom and liberation along with all other Greeks, and we will continue to fight for our freedom and self-determination.

During the Greek War of Independence in 1821, the Ottoman authorities feared that Greek Cypriots would rebel again. Archbishop Kyprianos, a powerful leader who worked to improve the education of Greek Cypriot children, was accused of plotting against the government. Kyprianos, his bishops, and hundreds of priests and important laymen were arrested and summarily hanged or decapitated on July 9, 1821.


The Annan plan was a US/UK plan made to solve the problems of Turkey, not of Cyprus. This is why you accepted it, and we rejected it. Very simple.

Keep dreaming about partition as you have done since the 50s.
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

Postby Nikitas » Fri Jul 11, 2008 9:48 am

Bananiot,

I objected to the Annan plan for reasons that were obvious to me then, as they are now, and these objections arose when I read the first summaries of the plan. This happened long before the tears of Tassos and for reasons which he never mentioned.

I was alarmed by the military arrangements insisted on by the Turks which gave them crushing firepower advantages over the Greek side in the interim period.

I objected to the obvious strategic advantages given to the Turkish side and the totally insane territorial arrangements with so many salients abutting into the GC sector.

I objected to the division of the GC sector in two sections by the Dehekelia base which stretched from the sea to abutt the TC sector in the north. There was no mention on the possibility of the British pulling out and the fate of the base territory in such an event.

Territory is always my primary concern because when all is said and done it is the most important aspect of the problem. I might be overly cynical but at some point in the near future I am sure that the Turkish side will find an excuse to nix the federation and pull out to claim independence and international rcognition. If that is their plan then let them do so with the minimum of territory and let that territory be very well defined with no possiblity for the creation of problems over "grey areas" like the British base areas. Good fences make good neighbors.

So it was not all Tassos and his tears. Some Cypriots, very few unfortunately, can think in terms opther than those that are used ad nauseam by most politicians.
Nikitas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7420
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:49 pm

Postby DT. » Fri Jul 11, 2008 9:53 am

Nikitas wrote:Bananiot,

I objected to the Annan plan for reasons that were obvious to me then, as they are now, and these objections arose when I read the first summaries of the plan. This happened long before the tears of Tassos and for reasons which he never mentioned.

I was alarmed by the military arrangements insisted on by the Turks which gave them crushing firepower advantages over the Greek side in the interim period.

I objected to the obvious strategic advantages given to the Turkish side and the totally insane territorial arrangements with so many salients abutting into the GC sector.

I objected to the division of the GC sector in two sections by the Dehekelia base which stretched from the sea to abutt the TC sector in the north. There was no mention on the possibility of the British pulling out and the fate of the base territory in such an event.

Territory is always my primary concern because when all is said and done it is the most important aspect of the problem. I might be overly cynical but at some point in the near future I am sure that the Turkish side will find an excuse to nix the federation and pull out to claim independence and international rcognition. If that is their plan then let them do so with the minimum of territory and let that territory be very well defined with no possiblity for the creation of problems over "grey areas" like the British base areas. Good fences make good neighbors.

So it was not all Tassos and his tears. Some Cypriots, very few unfortunately, can think in terms opther than those that are used ad nauseam by most politicians.


I was reading the plan again yesturday and the point that always makes me laugh is the amendment to the Treaties of Gaurantee's and alliance with regards to the SBA's. The ROC gives up all rights it has to the SBA continental shelf and 12 mile sea border.
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby DT. » Fri Jul 11, 2008 9:58 am

Article 5
Article 6
1. Section 3 of Annex A to the Treaty of Establishment shall be replaced by the following:
“Section 3
Cyprus shall not claim, as part of its territorial sea, waters lying between the lines described in the report referred to in the Additional Protocol to this Treaty.”


2. The lines referred to in Section 3, as amended, of Annex A to the Treaty of Establishment, which delimit the waters adjacent to the Sovereign Base Areas that the United Cyprus Republic shall not claim as part of its territorial sea, shall be set out in a report to be prepared by a duly qualified person to be designated by the Government of the United Kingdom. S/he shall begin the work not later than one month after the entry into force of this Protocol and complete it as soon as possible and in any event within a period of nine months. The designated person may appoint technical advisers to assist him/her. S/he shall report to the appropriate authorities of the United Kingdom and Cyprus upon completion of the work.


3. The United Kingdom shall continue to enjoy complete and unimpeded access for any purpose whatsoever to the waters lying between the waters which the United Cyprus Republic shall not claim adjacent to the eastern part of the Dhekelia Sovereign Base Area adjoining the sea (which part is marked on Map A with an area of 16.10 sq. km), and the waters which the United Cyprus Republic shall not claim adjacent to the western part of the Dhekelia Sovereign Base Area adjoining the sea (which is marked on Map A with an area of 5.01 sq km).
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby Nikitas » Fri Jul 11, 2008 10:02 am

DT,

Even more laughable, if it was not so serious, is the provision for over or underpasses where the GC state would go over the base areas to connect with the eastern section, ie Famagusta. Can you imagine a situation where the richest and fairly populous area of Famagusta would be joined to the rest of the GC sector by an underpass of flyover over what is essentially foreign territory!!!!

What geopolitically illiterate assholes accepted such a formulation without seeing that the people living in the Famagusta area would be forever captives of foreigners!!!

I looked over the Annan plan (whatever parts of it reached the public) to see a definition of territorial apportionment. Would the TC side get X percentage of the island or the RoC territory, the two are not the same. I did not find it. No one was alarmed about this ambiguity. And all the maps showed the GC sector always divided in two by the Dhekelia base and again no one saw the danger contained in such a territorial diivision.
Nikitas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7420
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:49 pm

Postby Oracle » Fri Jul 11, 2008 10:05 am

So basically all they were allowing us was a bit of Paphos ..... and even that would be subject to say-so from Turkey .... :roll:

Thieves!
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby DT. » Fri Jul 11, 2008 10:12 am

Nikitas wrote:DT,

Even more laughable, if it was not so serious, is the provision for over or underpasses where the GC state would go over the base areas to connect with the eastern section, ie Famagusta. Can you imagine a situation where the richest and fairly populous area of Famagusta would be joined to the rest of the GC sector by an underpass of flyover over what is essentially foreign territory!!!!

What geopolitically illiterate assholes accepted such a formulation without seeing that the people living in the Famagusta area would be forever captives of foreigners!!!

I looked over the Annan plan (whatever parts of it reached the public) to see a definition of territorial apportionment. Would the TC side get X percentage of the island or the RoC territory, the two are not the same. I did not find it. No one was alarmed about this ambiguity. And all the maps showed the GC sector always divided in two by the Dhekelia base and again no one saw the danger contained in such a territorial diivision.


I never paid the necessary attention to that because all the AP showed was coordinates of where this underpass would be and I couldn't be bothered to start plugging into a gps 700 coordinates.

Do you really think anyone from our negotiating team did? In the book Kings of Peace Pawns of War it says clearly how after every meeting with De Soto and a GC or TC you could always see Weston's and Hannay's cars parked outside De Soto's office. In fact they were over so often that De Sotos team named them the "cousins" after that movie (forgot the title).

No Cypriots were involved in the drafting of this much detail. Something that is obviously going on now thanks to the 8th July agreement. In my mind we're already in a better place than we would have been had we accepted the AP and let Bananiot jump up and down as much as he wants.
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby Nikitas » Fri Jul 11, 2008 10:23 am

A British professor called the plan the Hannan plan, a typically British humour but accurate.

Cypriot politicians are fixed on the constitutional part of the plan, and they are repeating our mistakes. They forget that we are facing an adversary who thinks geopolitically and has proven that it proceeds to its predefined objective with specific steps. Fixing the territorial issue will prevent many problems in the future. But we are not going to do it because we are Greeks and love dialectic while dismissing geopolitics. In other words we prefer Socrates over Thucydides and we will pay for it again.
Nikitas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7420
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:49 pm

Postby CanDiaz » Fri Jul 11, 2008 7:08 pm

Piratis wrote:
CanDiaz wrote:
Piratis wrote:
Greek-Cypriots are no more Greek than Americans are English!


Greek Cypriots are as Greek as any other Greek, and the only reason why we are not part of the Greek state is because this was denied to us.

Turks and British only won a battle in Cyprus. The war will never end until we win the right of freedom, self-determination and democracy on our own island.


Wow, incredible.


Just simple facts. Do you disagree with anything that I said above?


Admitting to wanting Union with Greece, therefore admitting you caused the Cyprus problem. Ok facts they are then. :lol:
CanDiaz
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 256
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 7:07 pm

Postby Piratis » Fri Jul 11, 2008 9:24 pm

CanDiaz wrote:
Piratis wrote:
CanDiaz wrote:
Piratis wrote:
Greek-Cypriots are no more Greek than Americans are English!


Greek Cypriots are as Greek as any other Greek, and the only reason why we are not part of the Greek state is because this was denied to us.

Turks and British only won a battle in Cyprus. The war will never end until we win the right of freedom, self-determination and democracy on our own island.


Wow, incredible.


Just simple facts. Do you disagree with anything that I said above?


Admitting to wanting Union with Greece, therefore admitting you caused the Cyprus problem. Ok facts they are then. :lol:


So from the liberation struggle of the Cypriot (and the Greek people in general) you conclude that the fault lies with the oppressed people that revolted seeking their freedom, and not with those foreign empires that imposed their rule on the Cypriot people?

Would you say the same for the Greeks in all other Greek islands and territories? Would you say the same for all people oppressed under some foreign empire that revolted seeking their freedom?

During the Greek War of Independence in 1821, the Ottoman authorities feared that Greek Cypriots would rebel again. Archbishop Kyprianos, a powerful leader who worked to improve the education of Greek Cypriot children, was accused of plotting against the government. Kyprianos, his bishops, and hundreds of priests and important laymen were arrested and summarily hanged or decapitated on July 9, 1821.


From the above you conclude that the desire of the Cypriot people to be part of a free Greek state along with the Greeks of all other Greek islands and territories, is what caused the Cyprus problem? Really? What are you again? "Spanish"? :roll:
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests