Viewpoint wrote:He was in a buffer zone, shinning up a flag pole to bring down a flag, ignoring all the warnings and he was not breaking the law I rest my case you are a lost cause.
DT. wrote:Viewpoint wrote:He was in a buffer zone, shinning up a flag pole to bring down a flag, ignoring all the warnings and he was not breaking the law I rest my case you are a lost cause.
What warnings? When did the Turks warn him? Ma are we being serious now? ONE OF YOUR ELECTED OFFICIALS A MINSTER OF AGRICULTURE TOOK A GUN AND STARTED HAVING POTSHOTS AT A GREEK CYPRIOT DEMONSTRATOR! HE THEN WENT ON IN AN INTERVIEW AND WAS WONDERING WHY WE ARE ALL MAKING SUCH A BIG DEAL ABOUT A DOG???
You people are on a different planet to the rest of this world.
And you're excusing this by saying the demonstrator broke the law?
SHOW ME THE LAW!
Viewpoint wrote:Oracle wrote:The fact VP said "rip down a flag" ... shows he is ascribing emotionally violent words (rip) to Solomou's actions, who was trying to "take down" the flag when normal language is used.
In his mind, VP is trying to make us think there is justification .... because he truly believes it is acceptable to shoot a Human for touching an object (flag) which represents VP's reason for being, reason for existing ... because without this flag, VP will be a nothing; VP (+ others) will not fit in anywhere. They are outcasts, mentally devoid.
In reality VP is dependent on symbolism because he was not brought up to question and have a free and open mind.
Indeed if VP was asked to open his mind, he would be afraid his brain would fall out, without the "borders" of the ideologies which hold it in place.
Was he breaking the law by rioting climbing up a pole to rip, bring take whatever you want the flag down? a yes or no is fine.
You appear to be confusing the 2 he broke the law and should have been arrested thats what the pentalty should have been but he was shot dead for which the culprits shoudl be made accountable, do you people not understand simple English?
Oracle wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Oracle wrote:The fact VP said "rip down a flag" ... shows he is ascribing emotionally violent words (rip) to Solomou's actions, who was trying to "take down" the flag when normal language is used.
In his mind, VP is trying to make us think there is justification .... because he truly believes it is acceptable to shoot a Human for touching an object (flag) which represents VP's reason for being, reason for existing ... because without this flag, VP will be a nothing; VP (+ others) will not fit in anywhere. They are outcasts, mentally devoid.
In reality VP is dependent on symbolism because he was not brought up to question and have a free and open mind.
Indeed if VP was asked to open his mind, he would be afraid his brain would fall out, without the "borders" of the ideologies which hold it in place.
Was he breaking the law by rioting climbing up a pole to rip, bring take whatever you want the flag down? a yes or no is fine.
You appear to be confusing the 2 he broke the law and should have been arrested thats what the pentalty should have been but he was shot dead for which the culprits shoudl be made accountable, do you people not understand simple English?
No he was not breaking any laws ... for they do not "exist" at present in that area of our country.
Besides .... in no civilised country, is it deemed acceptable to shoot someone for "breaking a law" ..
Do you have policemen shooting your drivers dead if they do 70 kph in a 65 kph road?
You really do reside in Hell ....
Viewpoint wrote:Oracle wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Oracle wrote:The fact VP said "rip down a flag" ... shows he is ascribing emotionally violent words (rip) to Solomou's actions, who was trying to "take down" the flag when normal language is used.
In his mind, VP is trying to make us think there is justification .... because he truly believes it is acceptable to shoot a Human for touching an object (flag) which represents VP's reason for being, reason for existing ... because without this flag, VP will be a nothing; VP (+ others) will not fit in anywhere. They are outcasts, mentally devoid.
In reality VP is dependent on symbolism because he was not brought up to question and have a free and open mind.
Indeed if VP was asked to open his mind, he would be afraid his brain would fall out, without the "borders" of the ideologies which hold it in place.
Was he breaking the law by rioting climbing up a pole to rip, bring take whatever you want the flag down? a yes or no is fine.
You appear to be confusing the 2 he broke the law and should have been arrested thats what the pentalty should have been but he was shot dead for which the culprits shoudl be made accountable, do you people not understand simple English?
No he was not breaking any laws ... for they do not "exist" at present in that area of our country.
Besides .... in no civilised country, is it deemed acceptable to shoot someone for "breaking a law" ..
Do you have policemen shooting your drivers dead if they do 70 kph in a 65 kph road?
You really do reside in Hell ....
So the guys that shot Soloman were also not breaking any laws seeing that you claim area of the globe is lawless. Man you need a wake up call gunman and rioters are tear gassed, charged by horses and shot all over the world, do you not read international press?
Hell is just fine for us.
Viewpoint wrote:He was in a buffer zone, shinning up a flag pole to bring down a flag, ignoring all the warnings and he was not breaking the law I rest my case you are a lost cause.
denizaksulu wrote:Viewpoint wrote:He was in a buffer zone, shinning up a flag pole to bring down a flag, ignoring all the warnings and he was not breaking the law I rest my case you are a lost cause.
Why wasnt the guy simply arrested? Why discretely shot from a balcony and not by a guard? There is something wrong here VP. I advise you to end defending the indefensible. This poor defense does not do credit to you.
Regards
denizaksulu wrote:Viewpoint wrote:He was in a buffer zone, shinning up a flag pole to bring down a flag, ignoring all the warnings and he was not breaking the law I rest my case you are a lost cause.
Why wasnt the guy simply arrested? Why discretely shot from a balcony and not by a guard? There is something wrong here VP. I advise you to end defending the indefensible. This poor defense does not do credit to you.
Regards
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest