The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Cyprus first veto against turkey

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Cyprus first veto against turkey

Postby boulio » Tue May 03, 2005 3:52 pm

http://www.in.gr/news/article.asp?lngEn ... gDtrID=244

says that cyprus today vetoed turkey from joining EU DEFENCE AND SECURTIY meetings and workshops.Cyprus stated that this is in response to turkey's constatnt veto of cyprus in joining EU-NATO meetings.
boulio
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2575
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:45 am

Postby pantelis » Tue May 03, 2005 4:20 pm

U.S. threats to establish the military logistics center either in neighboring Bulgaria or the Mediterranean island of Cyprus also jolted Turkey into a decision, said Murat Yetkin, a veteran observer of Turkish-American relations.


http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld ... &cset=true
pantelis
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 391
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2004 2:41 am
Location: USA

Postby brother » Tue May 03, 2005 5:15 pm

I have not read or heard any of this in any papers/online at all today are you sure that is a reliable source guys.
User avatar
brother
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4711
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 5:30 pm
Location: Cyprus/U.K

Postby brother » Tue May 03, 2005 5:38 pm

Pantelis,

can you copy and paste that article you have a link to please.
User avatar
brother
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4711
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 5:30 pm
Location: Cyprus/U.K

Postby pantelis » Tue May 03, 2005 7:09 pm

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-usturk3may03,1,3562369.story?coll=la-headlines-world&ctrack=1&cset=true

THE WORLD
Turkey OKs Expanded U.S. Use of Key Air Base
The arrangement, in principle, would allow the facility to serve as a hub for nonlethal cargo deliveries to Iraq and Afghanistan.
By Amberin Zaman
Special to The Times

May 3, 2005

ANKARA, Turkey — After months of hesitation, Turkey has agreed in principle to allow the U.S. expanded use of a strategic air base as a major hub for nonlethal cargo deliveries to Iraq and Afghanistan, Turkish and U.S. officials confirmed today.

"We have reached agreement for the cargo hub on mutually acceptable terms," said a senior Turkish official who spoke on condition of anonymity.

A U.S. Embassy spokesman said, "Turkish and U.S. military officials have almost completed work on the technical details of the arrangement."

Under the agreement, U.S. cargo would be flown to the Incirlik air base near the southern Turkish city of Adana on civilian charter planes and then transferred to military cargo planes for delivery to Iraq and Afghanistan.

That would make delivery of supplies to both countries less costly and more efficient, the U.S. official said.

The base has been used during and since the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq to refuel U.S. Air Force jets en route to Turkey's southern neighbor. The U.S. sees Turkish approval for expanded facilities as a positive if inadequate step toward improving ties between the two North Atlantic Treaty Organization allies. Although the request was made in June 2004, Turkey "did not respond until now," the U.S. official said.

Hopes for a deal rose last week when Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, a strong critic of U.S. policy in Iraq, told parliament that "the United States is the main axis of our foreign policy."

In his warmest description of relations with the U.S. since taking power more than two years ago, Erdogan added: "We can never forget America's support" for Turkey's efforts to join the European Union.

Erdogan does not need permission from parliament to allow U.S. use of the air base.

Relations have been rocky since the lead-up to the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003. At that time, parliament rejected a bill authorizing thousands of U.S. troops to use Turkish territory to open a second front against Saddam Hussein's forces in northern Iraq.

The U.S. later rebuffed an offer by Turkey to send troops to help police Sunni Muslim strongholds in central Iraq after Baghdad's interim government voiced strong opposition to any Turkish military presence.

Relations further deteriorated last year when Erdogan called Iraqi insurgents "martyrs" and members of his party described U.S. actions in Iraq as "genocide."

Analysts say the government's rhetoric was aimed at appeasing unprecedented anti-American sentiment in Turkey fueled in part by Turkish media coverage of U.S. military behavior in Iraq. "The government sees itself squeezed between the U.S. and the Islamic world," said Cuneyt Ulsever, a liberal commentator for the Hurriyet daily newspaper.

Washington's continued reluctance to take military action against separatist Kurdish rebels based in northern Iraq is another constant thorn. Turkish anger has deepened amid escalating violence between Turkish forces and the rebels, who say they have killed 50 Turkish soldiers in the last 10 days and claimed responsibility for two bomb attacks last week in Istanbul and the Aegean tourist resort of Kusadasi, which killed a policeman.

But some Western diplomats also blame members of Erdogan's circle of advisors for the chill. "There are those who are trying to persuade Erdogan that Turkey would be better off leading the Muslim world than being part of the European Union or a U.S. ally," said a European diplomat.

Hilmi Ozkok, Turkey's determinedly pro-Western chief of general staff, and Abdullah Gul, the country's moderate foreign minister, have played key roles behind the scenes in securing approval for the cargo hub, Turkish officials close to the negotiations confirmed.

U.S. threats to establish the military logistics center either in neighboring Bulgaria or the Mediterranean island of Cyprus also jolted Turkey into a decision, said Murat Yetkin, a veteran observer of Turkish-American relations.

Others believe that Erdogan approved the deal to help stave off a U.S. congressional resolution recognizing the mass killings of Armenians in Turkey during World War I as genocide and to secure a meeting with President Bush when he travels to the United States next month.

The president is now expected to receive Erdogan, a Turkish official said.
pantelis
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 391
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2004 2:41 am
Location: USA

Postby brother » Wed May 04, 2005 10:47 am

cheers pantelis. 8)
User avatar
brother
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4711
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 5:30 pm
Location: Cyprus/U.K

Postby brother » Wed May 04, 2005 10:49 am

Cyprus vetoes Turkey’s EU army deal


CyBC REPORTED yesterday that Cyprus had denied Turkey a say in decision-making procedures inside the EU’s Rapid Reaction Task Force.

According to state-run television, Cyprus vetoed Turkish attempts at securing participation in “administrative decisions” by the task force.

The reason given by the national broadcaster was that the government could not agree to this while Turkey blocked Cyprus’ participation in EU-NATO cooperation organisations.

The same reports said further discussion of the matter was referred to the next meeting of COREPER.

Meanwhile this mutual sabotaging by Cyprus and Turkey was creating problems for the intended creation of an informal forum for cooperation between the EU and NATO. CyBC said the upcoming British presidency of the EU would look into ways of breaking this deadlock.

Cyprus does not take part in actual operations by the European task force, with its role limited to the administrative level.
User avatar
brother
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4711
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 5:30 pm
Location: Cyprus/U.K

Postby magikthrill » Wed May 04, 2005 11:08 am

brother wrote:Cyprus vetoes Turkey’s EU army deal


CyBC REPORTED yesterday that Cyprus had denied Turkey a say in decision-making procedures inside the EU’s Rapid Reaction Task Force.

According to state-run television, Cyprus vetoed Turkish attempts at securing participation in “administrative decisions” by the task force.

The reason given by the national broadcaster was that the government could not agree to this while Turkey blocked Cyprus’ participation in EU-NATO cooperation organisations.

The same reports said further discussion of the matter was referred to the next meeting of COREPER.

Meanwhile this mutual sabotaging by Cyprus and Turkey was creating problems for the intended creation of an informal forum for cooperation between the EU and NATO. CyBC said the upcoming British presidency of the EU would look into ways of breaking this deadlock.

Cyprus does not take part in actual operations by the European task force, with its role limited to the administrative level.



Nice one. Of course this was probably the only time CYprus could use the veto so they figured "Why the hell not?" :)
magikthrill
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2245
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 10:09 am
Location: Athens, Greece

Postby brother » Wed May 04, 2005 11:16 am

I was thinking the same thing but it shows how little good will there is between turkey and cyprus, its almost childish, when these people who lead countries act this way.
What sort of message does it send to their constituents. :cry:
User avatar
brother
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4711
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 5:30 pm
Location: Cyprus/U.K

Postby cannedmoose » Thu May 05, 2005 12:04 am

Hate to say this, but I don't think the RoC government had any other choice than to veto this. Turkey has consistently blocked any Cypriot involvement in NATO, with little justification. Therefore, I think it was natural to expect the RoC to play tit-for-tat and prevent Turkish involvement in intra-EU security structures such as this. It may not be magnanimous, or even what we'd like to see from international statesmen, but it's how things work. Cyprus may not have blocked Turkey's involvement in talks with the EU, but this shows how much of an irritant they could be in future negotiations. Turkey should take this as a shot across the bows and appreciate that when they agreed to start talks with the EU, they essentially gave Cyprus a blank cheque to put obstacles in their way.
User avatar
cannedmoose
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4279
Joined: Sun Feb 29, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: England

Next

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest