Cyprus-Forum.com

[SSBubbles]

Bill, I agree with you totally, so let any heavies come this way is what I say.

Notwithstanding that however, i wonder if it would have raised the same objections if it was a picture of a child half blown up by allied bombings in Iraq, or a half dying child from the starving countries of Africa.

All the same though, where children are concerned, a bit more tact is required and I think even Sotos must realise that now. he is usually a very rational chap and this was an extreme for him IMHO

Sad

Too many graphics are given out on the tv and the likes (many of which will stay in my mind's eye till the day I die) I honestly do not think that gruesome pictures are needed - words should suffice - they can if necessary 'paint the picture' to the reader

[SSBubbles]

Stick to the topic Bill this topic was made for Richard that he said he was bored and that there were no controversial topics. I think I started the most controversial topic ever made on this forum but I don't see those that wanted controversy participating And I asked admin and he is said it is ok to discuss it but not promote any illegal activities and he just removed the picture. I see only Z4 and repulsewarrior replied to the topic!! Why nobody else dares to say his opinion?

Precisely Soto - maybe just a little too controversial don't you think?

If Richard is bored and wants to debate something - why can't he think of a suitable topic? (Richard - the ball is in your court mate). This has me baffled? I want controversy but I will let you start

BTW, I am pleased that you have had the picture removed

[Sotos]

words should suffice - they can if necessary 'paint the picture' to the reader

One picture worths a thousand words. You can imagine how inefficient that would be!

[Bill]

Stick to the topic Bill this topic was made for Richard that he said he was bored and that there were no controversial topics. I think I started the most controversial topic ever made on this forum but I don't see those that wanted controversy participating And I asked admin and he is said it is ok to discuss it but not promote any illegal activities and he just removed the picture. I see only Z4 and repulsewarrior replied to the topic!! Why nobody else dares to say his opinion?

Perhaps they are disassociating them selves from you and the subject in question .

Posting the picture of someone's daughter / grand daughter wasn't one of your greatest ideas and I'm pleased admin has removed it.

Bill

[SSBubbles]

words should suffice - they can if necessary 'paint the picture' to the reader

One picture worths a thousand words. You can imagine how inefficient that would be!

Not if the picture is portrayed in such 'bad taste' Soto!

Your words could convey exactly what you want - whereas different people view a picture and conjure up a myriad of 'conclusions'

[denizaksulu]

PEDOPHILIA

So you thought this controversial topic would be like the last one didn't you? No! this is not a joke. This is topic for men with big balls and hairless little girls So what do you think about it? Some girls told me that they masturbated since the age of 6 and they had orgasms And we all know that girls see periods from the age of 12 so it means that physically they are ready! But is it OK for two children age 12 to have sex with each other? What if a child of age 15 has sex with a child of age 12? Or what if an 18 year old has sex with 12 year old? Is the 18 year old pedophile criminal and should be sentenced to death? And what if it is an 18 year old girl and a 12 year old boy? Is the girl a criminal? I know for sure that I wouldn't mind when I was 12

Thanks Sotos.

[Sotos]

Your words could convey exactly what you want - whereas different people view a picture and conjure up a myriad of 'conclusions'

ermm.. my reply was for this:

Too many graphics are given out on the tv and the likes (many of which will stay in my mind's eye till the day I die) I honestly do not think that gruesome pictures are needed - words should suffice - they can if necessary 'paint the picture' to the reader

My picture was fake one and didn't have anything to do with the subject but when real pictures are used in TV or in newspapers I think they tell the story much better than any words. I don't like those pictures either but we have to face the reality of the world we live in.

[SSBubbles]

Your words could convey exactly what you want - whereas different people view a picture and conjure up a myriad of 'conclusions'

ermm.. my reply was for this:

Too many graphics are given out on the tv and the likes (many of which will stay in my mind's eye till the day I die) I honestly do not think that gruesome pictures are needed - words should suffice - they can if necessary 'paint the picture' to the reader

My picture was fake one and didn't have anything to do with the subject but when real pictures are used in TV or in newspapers I think they tell the story much better than any words. I don't like those pictures either but we have to face the reality of the world we live in.

Yes Soto, but one person 'viewing' a picture will not necessarily be 'viewed' in the same way by another person! Pictures do not always show the better story IMO anyway

[denizaksulu]

Your words could convey exactly what you want - whereas different people view a picture and conjure up a myriad of 'conclusions'

ermm.. my reply was for this:

Too many graphics are given out on the tv and the likes (many of which will stay in my mind's eye till the day I die) I honestly do not think that gruesome pictures are needed - words should suffice - they can if necessary 'paint the picture' to the reader

My picture was fake one and didn't have anything to do with the subject but when real pictures are used in TV or in newspapers I think they tell the story much better than any words. I don't like those pictures either but we have to face the reality of the world we live in.

I take your point Sotos, but unfortunately that image and the P....'s will always be associated, however fake it is.

[LENA]

You know what I understand why people got upset by this topic...but I dont see the reason why all of you attacked Sotos. I am sensitive too when it comes to children but its a serious thing here. I agree that the title Sotos chose and what he wrote latter doesnt really match.

The last 2 months I heard on the news about several men who got arrested for having sex with young children or touch them or watch naked pictures from children on internet etc....Sick sick sick...what made me angry and I was going to kill him if I was him...it was a case of an ankle who rape for years (since the age of 8 if I am not wrong) the daughter of his brother. I was going to kill him and not just take him to the police. That about pedophilia.

As for the rest Sotos wrote....well lots of teenagers are having sex from 13 until 16. I am not saying that are all like that but I believe that parents should talk to their kids. Discuss about sex and tell them that when they are in a relationship maybe their partners might push them for sex. Encourage kids to wait but not with the way that they will get punished if they have sex or scare them. When you say "dont" to teenagers you end up realizing that they are doing it because it was forbidden for them