Troodo wrote:However you wish to look at it– the TC’s rebelled or were forced out at gun point – with the tearing up of the thirteen articles the GC’s stole Cyprus. The constitution signed in 1960 was for a partnership, legally binding in international law. You can not change a legal agreement without the co-signatories authorisation. Conversely if you can arrange for the co-signatories to disappear, then you are free to draw up another agreement and set it before the international community for approval. This was not done, yet still the GC’s claim to be the government of the whole of Cyprus.
Do not give me the argument that the thirteen articles were only suspended - for forty years? – that one won’t wash in any honest court of law.
What I am saying is that until this anomaly is put right - with or without the TC’s, they can go their on way – then the government of the south has no legal claim over any part of Cyrus and are in fact illegal squatters. A criminal offence I do believe.
Troodo.
From the safe area.
welcome Tr, indeed.
...it is an offer to all Cypriots to build a Unitary state which will include millions of new citizens from the EU, and from the other continents which we adjoin. It is a way for 'us' to represent the Nations (two, three, (or more)), which derive from their culture a distinction 'here', to which they add to the Cypriot Identity. ...you must remember, 200 years from now, where we hope the world to be, and our place geographically in this shift.
cheers.