unitedwestand wrote:Its really childish to bring mothers into these discussions. It is only going to end up in insults being exchanged for no good reason. Grow up GR.
Get yourself a sense of humor Mitch...
kentish wrote:piratis you are doing what is called pissing against the wind.there is mutual distrust from both sides.your stupid rhetoric fools one.as a tc can i trust a gc to do the right thing in cyprus,can i f##k, 75/25 says it all.
up yours and goodbye
miltiades wrote:kentish wrote:piratis you are doing what is called pissing against the wind.there is mutual distrust from both sides.your stupid rhetoric fools one.as a tc can i trust a gc to do the right thing in cyprus,can i f##k, 75/25 says it all.
up yours and goodbye
Have you given up your Traffic Warden job then ??
Get Real! wrote:unitedwestand wrote:Its really childish to bring mothers into these discussions. It is only going to end up in insults being exchanged for no good reason. Grow up GR.
Get yourself a sense of humor Mitch...
Oracle wrote:Why are you offering me a health warning ... do you perhaps think three civil posts are my limit and then I turn abusive
OK ... not a game! In that case, I accept that you know better. That TCs are indeed unique in not being fully developed as free-thinking human beings and will self-destruct if faced with the harsh reality of only one vote per person ... So they want more.
Please tell me though Bir., why we GCs, who struggle &, strive with developing further as individuals (responsible beings) to motivate each other, should be lumbered with such a workload as to take in under our wings, backward (Literary Licence) people as the type of people you portray these beasts (LL) to be?
Why would we voluntarily take in a cuckoo which will be so demanding it will sap as dry whilst it is fed and nurtured at our expense ...
We do not need baggage. TCs join as equals; otherwise by your formula, I take it they are not worth harbouring, and we should look towards a solution without them.
Bir., ....you obviously have allowances up your sleeve, which you think we should make ... so spill the beans and end the frustration ....
Don't you know Cyprus and Turkey was joint piece of land ?
you started throwing mad again . Don't cry and complain later on as usual
kentish wrote:birkibrisli you need to get real.pirates calls turkey the puppeteer and tc the puppet.he wants to treat you as an ethnic minority and to run your future and you are brainwashed into being annoyed with my posting.
i make a few words and all the usual gc bile is awash culminating in utter bile from kifeas,it looks to me kifeas as the rubbish you invent about turkish treatment of kurds is your model of how you would like to treat tc in cyprus.
am i right or am i right
4 times larger etc etc who cares, is the tc better off financially and does he have more freedom of movement now or pre 1974
i dont like bullies and bullies and gc are the same thing
Piratis wrote:BirKibrisli wrote:Piratis wrote:I am also talking about solutions Bir, and not mere agreements that will only make our problem worst.
As I said a real solution can not be far from what I described above. There really isn't any alternative to human rights and democracy. The details of the system can be negotiated, but the principles of a true solution can not.
Instead of waisting our time looking for something that does not exist and perpetuate our problem with new problematic agreements, we should simply concentrate our efforts in achieving a real solution.
If and when a solution is achieved is something that only time will show, but the earlier we start working for a solution the better.
Fine,Piratis...The real solution according to you and me is a unitary state based on democratic principles and human rights...But you and I cannot really affect an agreement between the two communities...Those who can will have nothing less than a BBF based on political equality of the GCs and TCs...How are we going to get from here to our ideal "real" solution???
I disagree with you Bir. You and I can affect the agreement by refusing to accept some agreement that will not solve the Cyprus problem but make it worst and perpetuate it.
The first step in solving a problem is to recognize that there is a problem and identify what the problem exactly is.
Take the Kurds for example. Kurdistan is not a recognized entity, and for the international community there is no such problem as the "Turkish occupation of Kurdistan", and the Kurds have no international voice to fight for their rights.
In that respect Cyprus is far ahead of the Kurds in its struggle for freedom. The problem of illegal Turkish occupation of the north part of Cyprus is internationally recognized, and Cyprus has the international voice, and some small power within EU, to fight for justice.
If we accept some new agreement that will try to close (not solve) the Cyprus problem, then while our problem will remain the same, or even get worst, it will not be recognized as a problem by anybody anymore. Furthermore, by giving to Turkey the 50% power share of Cyprus with veto rights, it will mean that Cypriots will lose their international voice and will not be able to even complain.
I don't have the magic formula that can immediately solve the Cyprus problem under the current balance of power, but I know what we should and shouldn't do in order to avoid getting something worst and avoid making steps backwards in our struggle for freedom.
BirKibrisli wrote:Piratis wrote:BirKibrisli wrote:Piratis wrote:I am also talking about solutions Bir, and not mere agreements that will only make our problem worst.
As I said a real solution can not be far from what I described above. There really isn't any alternative to human rights and democracy. The details of the system can be negotiated, but the principles of a true solution can not.
Instead of waisting our time looking for something that does not exist and perpetuate our problem with new problematic agreements, we should simply concentrate our efforts in achieving a real solution.
If and when a solution is achieved is something that only time will show, but the earlier we start working for a solution the better.
Fine,Piratis...The real solution according to you and me is a unitary state based on democratic principles and human rights...But you and I cannot really affect an agreement between the two communities...Those who can will have nothing less than a BBF based on political equality of the GCs and TCs...How are we going to get from here to our ideal "real" solution???
I disagree with you Bir. You and I can affect the agreement by refusing to accept some agreement that will not solve the Cyprus problem but make it worst and perpetuate it.
The first step in solving a problem is to recognize that there is a problem and identify what the problem exactly is.
Take the Kurds for example. Kurdistan is not a recognized entity, and for the international community there is no such problem as the "Turkish occupation of Kurdistan", and the Kurds have no international voice to fight for their rights.
In that respect Cyprus is far ahead of the Kurds in its struggle for freedom. The problem of illegal Turkish occupation of the north part of Cyprus is internationally recognized, and Cyprus has the international voice, and some small power within EU, to fight for justice.
If we accept some new agreement that will try to close (not solve) the Cyprus problem, then while our problem will remain the same, or even get worst, it will not be recognized as a problem by anybody anymore. Furthermore, by giving to Turkey the 50% power share of Cyprus with veto rights, it will mean that Cypriots will lose their international voice and will not be able to even complain.
I don't have the magic formula that can immediately solve the Cyprus problem under the current balance of power, but I know what we should and shouldn't do in order to avoid getting something worst and avoid making steps backwards in our struggle for freedom.
I see what you are getting at,Piratis...But you are not considering one thing....the status quo is also making it worse and perpetuating it...And the longer it lasts the worse it will get...With an interim solution we have at least a chance to work on the understanding,trust ands respect aspects...At least we might get a chance to de-brainwash the people,to give them the opportunity to work and live together even partly or on a part-time basis,in a realistic sloution environment...the status quo will only lead to another hot conflict,which is what I think we must avoid at all cost...An interim solution might just lead to our ideal solution,a long time down the line...
BirKibrisli wrote:Oracle wrote:Why are you offering me a health warning ... do you perhaps think three civil posts are my limit and then I turn abusive
OK ... not a game! In that case, I accept that you know better. That TCs are indeed unique in not being fully developed as free-thinking human beings and will self-destruct if faced with the harsh reality of only one vote per person ... So they want more.
Please tell me though Bir., why we GCs, who struggle &, strive with developing further as individuals (responsible beings) to motivate each other, should be lumbered with such a workload as to take in under our wings, backward (Literary Licence) people as the type of people you portray these beasts (LL) to be?
Why would we voluntarily take in a cuckoo which will be so demanding it will sap as dry whilst it is fed and nurtured at our expense ...
We do not need baggage. TCs join as equals; otherwise by your formula, I take it they are not worth harbouring, and we should look towards a solution without them.
Bir., ....you obviously have allowances up your sleeve, which you think we should make ... so spill the beans and end the frustration ....
You call this a civilised post???? You obviously get pleasure from mind-masturbation techniques like these,but all you are doing is proving the fears of the average TC that you are not fit to share a country with...
I take delight in the knowledge that you are indeed a figment of someone else's twisted imagination...You cannot be a real person,and I am not in the habit of talking to invisible entities...
BirKibrisli wrote:]This is my wish too,Piratis....It makes perfect sense to me..Why should we entrench our differences and carry them over for eternity??? It would be asking for trouble....[b]But it looks as if it is too long a jump for the TCs... ...[/b]
Oracle wrote:Please explain that sentence for me BirKibrisli. Because if I said it I would be accused of racism.
If I said everyone else can see logic and reason and fairness ... but this is too much for TCs ... I would be accused of being a Nationalist GC.
Oracle wrote:I suspect you could only be playing a psychological game.
You will turn around and say .... this is precisely what Nationalist GCs think of TCs .... that they are too stupid, backward and too different to see things our way .... to see that forgetting our differences, is the only way to go forward ...
Please explain if you are proving a point .... otherwise you are not making logical sense ....
Oracle wrote:[/b]If TCs were truly as you portray them, we are surely lost ... and in my frustration this would make me say worse things about TCs (which I would hope they do not deserve, but you are doing a good job of making them sound as though they deserve derision) ... and next thing will be that Kifeas pops up wielding wrath ... [/b]
BirKibrisli wrote:It is very simple,Oracle. Blind Freddie can see now that we cannot go from where we are to a unitary state based on one-vote one -value democracy...It is the reality I have come to accept...I wish it was different but it is not...So I am now wondering...Can we possibly agree on an interm step,a temporary solution which will keep the way open for true unification some time in the future...???Or do we refuse to budge from our ideal solution and wait for "the balance of power to change"...Try to answer the question without throwing insults about,please...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest