Oracle wrote:samarkeolog wrote:It is simply absurd for you to complain that my 'allegations' are 'unsupported', with 'no sources of reference', when as far as I know, every single claim has a link to the sources of reference that support my claims; indeed, moments ago, you were recommending I provided fewer links to corroborating evidence.
The quote above made to Get Real! brings to mind how I felt reading your elaborate account of Racist Greek Cypriot youths. A personal encounter I supposed, so perhaps you could be allowed leniency on corroboration and links.
I can only apologise that I didn't have a news crew, or at the very least a journalist, with me to have any corroboration. I apologise, too, that I didn't witness any racist attacks in the almost equal amount of time I spent in the North. I did witness violence (
against women and
against transvestites/transsexuals) in Istanbul, which I did also write about, but, not being in Cyprus, I didn't mention it here.
But flicking through as much as possible of your voluminous trough, I could find no other similar experiences to balance the one-sidedness I immediately felt. That would be fine as you cannot force experiences.
But I was left wondering why you included it?
Basically, I included it because I was appalled by it; I already pitied the foreign workers for the way they get treated generally, then saw a gang of kids intimidating and later attacking them. Also, I included it because it was part of the situation in Cyprus, both the racist kids attacking the immigrants and the anarchist kid defending them. If you insist on me having a bias, it is not about Greeks or Turks, but about nationalists and non-nationalists. I have a bias against nationalists. I think nationalists do their own nations harm, as well as others'.
If retaining you must, then I would add that, save for unquestioning Turkish youths intent on believing anything accusing GCs of racism, your narrative gives you away.
Put simply your bias emanates here more strongly than anywhere else. Tarnishing all the other (skilled) attempts to come across as an impartial historian.
As I mentioned in the racist youths' attack post, it was an anti-racist Greek Cypriot who helped the immigrant workers; so, I didn't accuse Greek Cypriots of racism, but present an experience that showed that both racism and anti-racism within the Greek Cypriot community.
Your narrative accuses me of accusing Greek Cypriots of racism, but my narrative only accuses violent nationalists of harming those they claim to protect. What bias do you have that you seem to want me to be biased towards one side or the other, when I'm not?