The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


COURT REJECTED CASE FILED AGAINST `REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS`

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby Oracle » Fri May 30, 2008 8:34 pm

CopperLine= Delusions of Grandeur :lol:
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby Get Real! » Fri May 30, 2008 8:50 pm

CopperLine wrote:The emperor has no clothes.

Get Real writes
Look, this is a court case ALREADY UNDERWAY, that already has decisions being thrown around that most of us here CANNOT challenge as we don’t have the stacks of volumes of reference on international litigation at out disposal, so we are reduced to mere spectators whether we like it or not.


When any number of cases - property cases, missing persons cases, compensation cases, law of the sea cases, and goodness knows what else - were underway did Get Real ever raise the objection 'Stop don't discuss this in the forum ! I don't know what I'm talking about' ? No of course he didn't. This latest objection is just garbage.

Who said anything about making a challenge ? This is a red herring. Of course members of a discussion forum can't make a challenge we are not parties to the case ! But we are commentators. And we'll comment on this case with the same degrees of sense or nonsense as we have done with any other case that has been discussed on this forum in the past.

And yes Get Real I do have a legal library to turn to should I need to. And you, to a large extent, have access to a publicly available legal library should you wish to use it (and know how to use it).

I really fail to see that you can have any serious and consistent objection to members of the forum, yourself included, discussing this and any other case.

This is not one of those clear cut cases like ones we have discussed in the past like... “Are TRNC ports legal?” …for which we could easily look up the appropriate convention and find that only recognized members could determine what constitutes “open” or “closed” in their respective country etc.

This particular case is EXTREMELY COMPLEX because it encompasses the already complicated Human Rights laws that are even further complicated by the plaintiff’s SELF DEPRIVATION of his/her rights by willingly being a member of an illegal entity that is actually the RESPONSIBLE PARTY of what the plaintiff is complaining about!!!

That’s what I call messy and I pity the lawyers of both sides who have to deal with this case. That’s why I said at the beginning that it requires expertise to discuss it.
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby CopperLine » Fri May 30, 2008 8:50 pm

Oracle=compulsions of idiocy
User avatar
CopperLine
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1558
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:04 pm

Postby Oracle » Fri May 30, 2008 8:59 pm

Aaahh .. CopperLine can play! :lol:
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby umit07 » Fri May 30, 2008 9:07 pm

Oracle wrote:
umit07 wrote: ... I is shitin me pants :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


umit ... kindly stop paraphrasing Ali G ... I may have to youtube again! :evil:


Bloody hell what is it with you and this "Ali G" he ain't the only guy that talks slang. I guess you is neva been in Norf Landın haz ya? But then agian I haven't either :lol:
User avatar
umit07
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2075
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 1:02 pm

Postby umit07 » Fri May 30, 2008 9:09 pm

Just to get this clear GR as thought the case was over . Am I wrong?
User avatar
umit07
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2075
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 1:02 pm

Postby Get Real! » Fri May 30, 2008 11:25 pm

umit07 wrote:Just to get this clear GR as thought the case was over . Am I wrong?

It's only beginning I'd say. They can appeal the decision and if they're successful they then have to prove that the RoC was responsible while the state was being attacked and overrun by one of its guarantors, which the plaintiff then went to live with and formed part of that “harboring” which has no doubt played its role in finding the missing! :? :lol:

Only in Cyprus...
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby umit07 » Sat May 31, 2008 7:44 am

Get Real! wrote:
umit07 wrote:Just to get this clear GR as thought the case was over . Am I wrong?

It's only beginning I'd say. They can appeal the decision and if they're successful they then have to prove that the RoC was responsible while the state was being attacked and overrun by one of its guarantors, which the plaintiff then went to live with and formed part of that “harboring” which has no doubt played its role in finding the missing! :? :lol:

Only in Cyprus...


Only from you GR can I expect an remark like the above. Now we are blaming Turkey for the murders of civillian TC's. Your logic is twisted as it can get .
User avatar
umit07
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2075
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 1:02 pm

Postby denizaksulu » Sat May 31, 2008 10:54 am

umit07 wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
umit07 wrote:Just to get this clear GR as thought the case was over . Am I wrong?

It's only beginning I'd say. They can appeal the decision and if they're successful they then have to prove that the RoC was responsible while the state was being attacked and overrun by one of its guarantors, which the plaintiff then went to live with and formed part of that “harboring” which has no doubt played its role in finding the missing! :? :lol:

Only in Cyprus...


Only from you GR can I expect an remark like the above. Now we are blaming Turkey for the murders of civillian TC's. Your logic is twisted as it can get .



This is GR all over again. Sometimes his level of stupidity is embarrasing to the Cypriot people.

Get real Get Real. :roll: :roll:
User avatar
denizaksulu
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 36077
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 11:04 am

Postby 74LB » Sat May 31, 2008 11:15 am

denizaksulu wrote:
umit07 wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
umit07 wrote:Just to get this clear GR as thought the case was over . Am I wrong?

It's only beginning I'd say. They can appeal the decision and if they're successful they then have to prove that the RoC was responsible while the state was being attacked and overrun by one of its guarantors, which the plaintiff then went to live with and formed part of that “harboring” which has no doubt played its role in finding the missing! :? :lol:

Only in Cyprus...


Only from you GR can I expect an remark like the above. Now we are blaming Turkey for the murders of civillian TC's. Your logic is twisted as it can get .



This is GR all over again. Sometimes his level of stupidity is embarrasing to the Cypriot people.

Get real Get Real. :roll: :roll:


Sorry guys, but I think GR says it played a role in 'finding the missing', not actually killing them.
74LB
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 455
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 3:16 pm
Location: UK

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests