JimB wrote:natureofcyprus wrote:Hi Jim,
I agree with you about bigger culprits out there.
This winter ski in the desert in summer was a thing that stood out for me.
Certainly there are many more important environmental problems.
Take care
Back to the topic.
I've been doing some research on the indoor ski-slope in Dubai. The company which owns the facility is Majid Al Futtaim Ltd (MAFL).
MAFL own Dalkia Group which is a major energy provider. The Dalkia Group were responsible for the design, installation and setup of the ski dome.
A press release from the group says that they pioneered technological advances in the design of the dome and that the facility re-uses a massive amount of energy to aid in cooling other parts of the mall which are co-located. The actual energy cost of the facility amounts to only 10% of the energy used by the rest of the mall. They claim that in comparison to other similar facilities they use substantially less energy and at a lower cost.
Check out the ski-dubai and other links on the groups web page at
http://www.dalkia.ae/articles.htmlNot sure how much credence to give it and I'd always be prudent with facts and figures from any companies site.
However, on the face of it, they don't appear to be all bad as they keep making year on year energy savings across the group and they have an environmental policy.
Excellent JimB – some real information instead of hysterical knee-jerk reaction!
The reason I have made such a fuss about this is that I’m fed up of environmental campaigners crusading about lifestyle changes we should make based on little or no evidence.
Take this place in Dubai as an example; this was my thought process on it.
I’d doubt if anybody is going to fly all the way there for an indoor skiing venue – if you were in the UK you could go to Milton Keynes instead.
So, it is very much a ‘local’ attraction for people that are already in Dubai or perhaps an extra feature that makes you make your mind up.
I think it was safe to assume from the start that in the extreme conditions of Dubai the place would be extremely well insulated and use the latest technology available to conserve energy. You certainly couldn’t afford for the thousands of tonnes of ‘snow’ you had manufactured to melt of there was an exceptionally hot day.
Also, if the place holds, say 500 people enjoying the skiing, that’s 500 people that aren’t at home or in their offices sitting in front of their own personal air conditioning system because it is so hot outside.
Conversely, thousands of people fly to American and Canadian ski resorts every winter. They rent vast 4 x 4’s, stay in heated hotels and when not skiing, zoom around on snowmobiles. Which is more environmentally unfriendly?
Natureofcyprus has failed to make a case for a boycott on this supposedly environmentally unfriendly indoor ski centre. She has refused to answer my questions regarding comparative leisure activities and whether they should also be banned – sorry, not banned just boycotted.
A typical environmentalist.