natureofcyprus wrote:OK.
I am glad that this subject has attracted discussion. That was the purpose of my post. To attract discussion and questioning. I dont believe that there are wise people whose opinion cannot be questioned. We all live to learn and hopefully develop, as individuals and hopefully as societies. And probably there are many truths, not one. It is easy to call people names. It is a lot more difficult to keep your temper and try to argue in a democratic way that respects other people's opinion. Try to listen and try to write statements that have a bit of thinking behind them.
Some people say, yeah, why not have ski slopes in a desert at 45 or 50 degrees of temperature. Others may say, why not create an artificial beach at 35 degrees tempereture, north of Moscow in winter. Russia has loads of oil, so, who not enjoy? These are legitimate arguments, to which one could give a counter argument.
I dont know how much energy is consumed to maintain ski slopes in the desert under a temperature of 45 degrees. It sounds to me that it will be huge. If someone has an answer, I would be happy to hear it. Also, I am against the idea of cooling water in swimming pools. I understand the need for airconditioning, but I think probably this is abused. Natural solutions should be considered more, like bioclimatic designs.
Regarding the use of water from dams, eg from Hoover dam, I believe that many (or probably most) experts have come to realise that water should be used wisely, including water from a huge dam like Hoover.
Maybe a boycot goes too far, but I think that Emirates should receive a message from those of us who agree that winter ski at 45 degrees temperature is too costly for the environment to maintain.
natureofcyprus wrote:This is no guess work.
It is an assessment based on my studies and work experience (which includes making economic analysis for power plants and heating networks in Siberia). I am not a power engineer, but I have worked closely with some.
For those who do not believe that the ski slopes are using a lot of electricity, let me remind them of blackouts that we faced in Cyprus last summer but also elsewhere (eg in the US) because of the considerable power consumption as a result of increased air conditioning use.
If you recall, I did not suggest forcing the closure of the place down. I proposed to boycot it.
I am in favour of somewhat rational use of resources.
natureofcyprus wrote:let me remind them of blackouts that we faced in Cyprus last summer but also elsewhere (eg in the US) because of the considerable power consumption as a result of increased air conditioning use.
JimB wrote:natureofcyprus wrote:let me remind them of blackouts that we faced in Cyprus last summer but also elsewhere (eg in the US) because of the considerable power consumption as a result of increased air conditioning use.
Blackouts in Cyprus? Don't tell me I've got this to look forwards to as well as the water cuts?????
Suffered blackouts in Johannesburg (though they use the rather less intimidating term 'load shedding' over there). Not nice.
Back to the topic.
I wouldn't boycott a place because of an indoor ski-slope.
That would be like boycotting Cyprus because it didn't have a mass passenger transit system which in turn forces people to use extremely polluting cars ....
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest