74LB wrote:POSTs findings show that what
was being taught and what
is now being taught are different and I for one welcome the changes that are/have taken place.
They say :
Main Findings of the Project:
The comparative analysis illustrates that the new history textbooks mark a clear break from the approaches used in the old textbooks. The new books evaluate historical issues from a humanistic perspective. Moreover, there is no obvious indication of a national enemy, or the “other” in the new books. One of the most fundamental characteristics of the new textbooks is the emphasis on social history and its role in general history. By emphasizing social history, the idea of Cypriotness is promoted.The new books are strikingly different from the old textbooks, as they encourage students to employ critical thinking and analyse the subject matter from various viewpoints, (including the Greek Cypriot perspective).
The revised textbooks contain many visual images including photographs, drawings and caricatures. These visual images are used as an additional learning tool and help to further explain and highlight important points.
By and large, the text and the visual images contained in all three books, attempt to provide a balanced view of Cyprus and its people.
It would be interesting to compare the findings of POST with the work carried out by AKTI (who I believe carried out similar research on the GC education system). Their website only gives a summary so does not contain as much detail as provided by their TC counterparts (maybe GR can post their full findings for us to compare).
http://akti.org.cy/portal/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=42&Itemid=5.AKTI says :
Collaboration with the Turkish Cypriot team responsible for studying the textbooks used in the final grade of Turkish Cypriot elementary school, has shown that Turkish Cypriot history education also presents major problems as according to the study, the Turkish Cypriot students are also educated to perceive an "us" which defies the "other" i.e. the Greeks. It would be useful to form an educational committee consisting of Greek Cypriot and Turkish Cypriot scholars, in order to investigate the possibility of writing a pilot book on the history of Cyprus , which will recognize the identity of each community while at the same time highlighting the coexistence of these two identities in the Cypriot space.
Note the use of the word '
also'
74LB what you posted sounds like an ad: "The all new XYZ, now with a new improved much better formula!"
Well,
what specifically was changed?
Have the now stopped presenting the Greek Cypriots as being criminals for simply wanting their liberation from the British and Ottoman overlords as it happened to other parts of the Hellenic world?
Have they now finally told the truth to the TCs about how the inter-communal conflict started and that
both sides had losses from it?
Have they stopped propagating the lie that in 1974 the Turkish army made a "peace operation" to save the TCs that were supposedly genocided (when the fact is that in 1974 no TC was harmed until after the Turks with the help of TCs invaded our country and started to kill Cypriots by the 1000s).
These are the main big lies which the Turkish occupation regime has been brainwashing TCs for decades, in order to excuse the creation of the pseudo state and the need for partition.
Has any of the above changed?