Cyprus-Forum.com

[Kifeas]

Rejectionists are the people who have never agreed to a compromise solution to the Cyprus issue. Papadopoulos tops the list of rejectionists because he rejected all proposals to solve the Cyprob since 1959. These people want a unitary Cyprus with a Greek governing majority and a Turkish minority, at best. These people want Cyprus to be a Greek island and would never accept the Turkish Cypriots to be equal partners in any constitutional arrangement. "Simerini" newspaper is the darling of all rejectionists and some of us, old enough to remember, it was the newspaper that embraced the coupists after 1974, calling the military coup "epananges", that is, a necessity.

See how outdated Bananiot is! It seems to be news to him that Simerini in the last presidential elections, upon intructions of Hadjikostis, not only did not side with Papdopoullos but was in fact against him, and rather lightly in favor of kasoulides!

[Get Real!]

Rejectionists are the people who have never agreed to a compromise solution to the Cyprus issue. Papadopoulos tops the list of rejectionists because he rejected all proposals to solve the Cyprob since 1959. These people want a unitary Cyprus with a Greek governing majority and a Turkish minority, at best. These people want Cyprus to be a Greek island and would never accept the Turkish Cypriots to be equal partners in any constitutional arrangement. "Simerini" newspaper is the darling of all rejectionists and some of us, old enough to remember, it was the newspaper that embraced the coupists after 1974, calling the military coup "epananges", that is, a necessity.

Technically, there is NOTHING to “compromise” because Cyprus is a recognized independent republic and member of the UN whereas the “TRNC” is not.

If a group of Cypriot citizens, regardless of their ethnic background, have formed an illegal breakaway group then it is both an international crime (as condemned by the UN in resolution 541) and a national crime (treason).

The ONLY reason why some fools are prepared to “compromise” AGAINST both national and international laws is because of unethical BLACKMAIL in the form of the Turkish military threat which also happens to provide an excuse for the enemies of Cyprus, such as yourself, to promote their ILLEGALITIES in support of their personal interests at the expense of the RoC and her people.

[Bananiot]

Hadjicostis has a personal agenda, most people know this. How about Lazaros Mavrou, Savvas Iacovides and the rest of the rejectionists?

[Bananiot]

Wake up GR, climb down from the clouds.

[Get Real!]

Hadjicostis has a personal agenda, most people know this. How about Lazaros Mavrou, Savvas Iacovides and the rest of the rejectionists?

The only compromise I see Bananiot is that of your character...

[Piratis]

Let me go ask the 76% of the people that rejected the Annan plan and lets see if they have a "personal agenda".

But who cares what is for the best of Cypriots, right? Lets just do what is for the interests of the Turks and the British.

Bananiot, Cyprus is our island. Our role here is not to reject or accept options that foreigners give to us. Our role is to take the decisions, in a democratic way, for our own island. Colonialism is supposedly over, isn't it? And if it isn't yet, then we should keep fighting until it is.

[Get Real!]

Wake up GR, climb down from the clouds.

It’s the REJECTIONISTS of international law and Democracy that are hovering in the clouds too drunk in corruption to descend…

http://www.un.int/cyprus/scr541.htm

[Piratis]

Hadjicostis has a personal agenda, most people know this. How about Lazaros Mavrou, Savvas Iacovides and the rest of the rejectionists?

The only compromise I see Bananiot is that of your character...

Thats right GR. How can anybody talk about compromises in human rights and democracy and keep a straight face?

There are some things that compromising them is a bad thing. Bananiot doesn't seem to understand this.

Can you imagine if in another country they announced that they would compromise the human rights of their citizens that belong to a specific ethnic group as a "compromise" to the demands of some racist groups? Would Bananiot congratulate such a country for being compromising and finding the middle way between human rights and the demands of those racists?

[unitedwestand]

Hadjicostis has a personal agenda, most people know this. How about Lazaros Mavrou, Savvas Iacovides and the rest of the rejectionists?

The only compromise I see Bananiot is that of your character...

Thats right GR. How can anybody talk about compromises in human rights and democracy and keep a straight face?There are some things that compromising them is a bad thing. Bananiot doesn't seem to understand this.

Can you imagine if in another country they announced that they would compromise the human rights of their citizens that belong to a specific ethnic group as a "compromise" to the demands of some racist groups? Would Bananiot congratulate such a country for being compromising and finding the middle way between human rights and the demands of those racists?

Bananiot has the decency to take the TCs human rights into consideration. You just cant stomach that can you? After all to you we are only fucking Turks.

[Piratis]

Hadjicostis has a personal agenda, most people know this. How about Lazaros Mavrou, Savvas Iacovides and the rest of the rejectionists?

The only compromise I see Bananiot is that of your character...

Thats right GR. How can anybody talk about compromises in human rights and democracy and keep a straight face?There are some things that compromising them is a bad thing. Bananiot doesn't seem to understand this.

Can you imagine if in another country they announced that they would compromise the human rights of their citizens that belong to a specific ethnic group as a "compromise" to the demands of some racist groups? Would Bananiot congratulate such a country for being compromising and finding the middle way between human rights and the demands of those racists?

Bananiot has the decency to take the TCs human rights into consideration. You just cant stomach that can you? After all to you we are only fucking Turks.

Can you point to me even a single human rights of TCs I do not take into consideration? I support that all Cypriots should have the 100% of their human rights.

What you support (and what Bananiot accepts) is that TCs should violate the rights of GCs. That I do not accept my friend.