With the advent of newer forms of transport and travel, the old and established communities throughout Cyprus underwent gradual changes which naturally had an effect on the manner in which one area dealt with another.
There may have existed something similar to the 'clan' system of Scotland but certainly not as well defined.
A resident of the Pafos region would have had different values to those of Karpasia and, even to this day, it would seem that those of different regions are assumed to possess certain characteristics which are common to the area from which they hailed.
Throughout the world, regional differences are quite obvious between the residents of those regions, whether or not there were tensions between them would depend on the way they appraised each other.
I like to think that the basic good-natured traits of the original Cypriots survived to this very day, such a pity that the modern world has taken it's toll of those traits, to some extent.
I would base my theory (for that is all it can be) on certain experiences I have had on this very forum.
The Karpasian seems to be quite well mannered, fair minded and perceptive. He possesses the ability to see the opinions of others and has a great deal of compassion for those who suffer at the hands of those who oppress. He is ready to discuss matters in a civilized manner and is ready to concede that he does not know everything. He appears to be quite inquisitive and does not readily accept propoganda and certainly not lies and deceitfulness.
The Pafian however, displays the absolute opposite of the virtues described above, he is loud, vulgar, myopic and quite indifferent to the suffering of others (indeed he agrees with oppression). He will not countenance the slightest variation to his own opinions, will not tolerate any form of contradiction and, I fear would rather die than admit to be in error. He does have one superior weapon (against the Karpasian), he is probably of older stock and has used that extra time to develop the use of foul language and torrential abuse when confronted by his imagined foe, if such attributes could be converted to arrows, the archers of the Pafian would surely have conquered the world.
The Karpasian is far more apt to direct his gentler approach to the tending of his land and the savouring of his 'Souvla'.
Just my considered opinion, nothing to get excited about.