The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


The Divisions of Cyprus!

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

The Divisions of Cyprus!

Postby Kifeas » Mon May 12, 2008 9:32 pm

The Divisions of Cyprus
by Perry Anderson

http://www.lrb.co.uk/v30/n08/ande01_.html

A Cyprus issue perspective by a world widely very well known and respected British intellectual.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perry_Anderson
User avatar
Kifeas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4927
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Lapithos, Kyrenia, now Pafos; Cyprus.

Postby Piratis » Tue May 13, 2008 1:02 am

Thats a very good article describing the whole recent history of Cyprus.
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

Postby miltiades » Tue May 13, 2008 8:33 am

Particularly revealing the following piece .


""""When the whip was cracked, it came steel-tipped. ‘A few riots in Ankara would do us nicely,’ an official in the Foreign Office had noted. In September 1955, as Cyprus was being discussed at a three-power conference in London, the Turkish secret police planted a bomb at the house where Kemal Ataturk was born in Salonica. At the signal of this ‘Greek provocation’, mobs swarmed through Istanbul looting Greek businesses, burning Orthodox churches, and attacking Greek residents. Although no one in official circles in London doubted that the pogrom was unleashed by the Turkish government, Macmillan – in charge of the talks – pointedly did not complain.

Internal developments lent a hand to this external lever. Ready enough to kill Communists, Grivas had given EOKA strict instructions not to attack Turks, whom he had no wish to antagonise, but to target Greek collaborators with the British, above all in the police. Under EOKA pressure, their number rapidly dwindled. To replace them, Harding recruited Turks, and added a Police Mobile Reserve, dipping for the purpose into the lumpen element in the Turkish community
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Postby miltiades » Tue May 13, 2008 8:43 am

He goes on to say :

""""Over the next four years, his National Organisation of Cypriot Fighters – EOKA – waged a guerrilla war of lethal efficacy, which London never succeeded in stamping out. By the end, Grivas had pinned down some 28,000 British troops with a force of not much more than two hundred men: a feat made possible – his own gifts as a commander were quite limited – only by the breadth of support the national cause enjoyed among the population. As a purely military performance, the EOKA campaign was perhaps the most successful of all anti-colonial resistances in the postwar period.""""
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Postby bilako22 » Tue May 13, 2008 8:58 am

miltiades wrote:He goes on to say :

""""Over the next four years, his National Organisation of Cypriot Fighters – EOKA – waged a guerrilla war of lethal efficacy, which London never succeeded in stamping out. By the end, Grivas had pinned down some 28,000 British troops with a force of not much more than two hundred men: a feat made possible – his own gifts as a commander were quite limited – only by the breadth of support the national cause enjoyed among the population. As a purely military performance, the EOKA campaign was perhaps the most successful of all anti-colonial resistances in the postwar period.""""


I can tell that you Greek guys miss EOKA Grivas.
User avatar
bilako22
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 9:57 am

Postby Oracle » Tue May 13, 2008 9:06 am

Thanks Kifeas.

For newbies and non-historians like myself this article is concise and well explained. Is it a summary of a book?

There are some profound statements which lend encouragement, but also add to the frustration as to why Cyprus is denied the justice it deserves.

The breakdown of the Annan plan was particularly refreshing:

Hannay was not wrong in remarking – he was in a position to do so – that, for all the jungle of technical modifications that developed across its five versions, the essence of the ‘Annan’ plan remained unaltered throughout. It contained three fundamental elements. The first prescribed the state that would come into being. The Republic of Cyprus, as internationally recognised for forty years – repeatedly so by the UN itself – would be abolished, along with its flag, anthem and name. In its stead, a wholly new entity would be created, under another name, composed of two constituent states, one Greek and the other Turkish, each vested with all powers in its territory, save those – principally concerned with external affairs and common finance – reserved for a federal level. There a senate would be divided 50:50 between Greeks and Turks, a lower chamber elected on a proportionate basis, with a guaranteed 25 per cent for Turks. There would be no president, but an executive council, composed of four Greeks and two Turks, elected by a ‘special majority’ requiring two-fifths of each half of the senate to approve the list. In case of deadlock, a supreme court composed of three Greeks, three Turks and three foreigners would assume executive and legislative functions. The central bank would likewise have an equal number of Greek and Turkish directors, with a casting vote by a foreigner.
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby Oracle » Tue May 13, 2008 9:16 am

The clarity of the rights and wrongs is so obvious, once explained so well.

Only seasoned liars can continue to deny the extent of wrongs imposed on Cyprus by Turkey and its co-executioners.

It's hard to resist from re-quoting sections of this fine article (so I won't resist ... unless I'm faced with wrath again :wink: )

Still on the Annan plan:

At their core lies a ratification of ethnic cleansing, of a scale and thoroughness that has been the envy of settler politics in Israel, where Avigdor Lieberman – leader of the far right Yisrael Beiteinu, now the fifth largest party in the Knesset – publicly calls for a ‘Cypriot solution’ on the West Bank, a demand regarded as so extreme that it is disavowed by all his coalition partners. Not only does the plan absolve Turkey from any reparations for decades of occupation and plunder, imposing their cost instead on those who suffered them. It is further in breach of the Geneva Convention, which forbids an occupying power to introduce settlers into conquered territory. Far from compelling their withdrawal, the plan entrenched their presence: no one ‘will be forced to leave’, in Pfirter’s words. So little did legal norms matter in the conception of the plan, that care was taken to remove its provisions from the jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights and Court of Justice in advance.

No less contemptuous of the principles of any existent democracy, the plan accorded a minority of between 18 and 25 per cent of the population 50 per cent of the decision-making power in the state. To see how grotesque such a proposal was, it is enough to ask how Turkey would react if it were told that its Kurdish minority – also around 18 per cent – must be granted half of all seats in its Senate, sweeping rights to block action in its executive, not to speak of some 30 per cent of its land area under its exclusive jurisdiction. What UN or EU emissary, or apologist for the Annan Plan among the multitude in the Western media, would dare travel to Ankara with such a scheme in his briefcase? Ethnic minorities need protection – Turkish Kurds, by any measure, considerably more than Turkish Cypriots – but to make of this a flagrant political disproportion is to invite hostility, rather than restrain it.
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby miltiades » Tue May 13, 2008 9:22 am

bilako22 wrote:
miltiades wrote:He goes on to say :

""""Over the next four years, his National Organisation of Cypriot Fighters – EOKA – waged a guerrilla war of lethal efficacy, which London never succeeded in stamping out. By the end, Grivas had pinned down some 28,000 British troops with a force of not much more than two hundred men: a feat made possible – his own gifts as a commander were quite limited – only by the breadth of support the national cause enjoyed among the population. As a purely military performance, the EOKA campaign was perhaps the most successful of all anti-colonial resistances in the postwar period.""""


I can tell that you Greek guys miss EOKA Grivas.

If you bother to learn something read the entire article you will then see that EOKA was not what appears in propaganda trash but an organization of freedom fighters who were instructed by their leader not to "antagonise " the T/Cs , a fact because I was around at the time and the only enemies of EOKA apart from the British troops were the collaborators , an inevitable event in all struggles.
As you will see the propaganda that EOKA was a bunch of murderers (HERE WE MEAN THE ORIGINAL EOKA NOT SUBSEQUENT BASTARDISED DIVERSIONS ) does not stand up to serious scrutiny .
The T/Cs were never seen as a target , that came much later when the British implemented their favourite colonial weapon , divide and rule . They encouraged conflict along ethnic lines .
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Postby Kikapu » Tue May 13, 2008 9:35 am

Thanks Kifeas,

I have just copied the article, all 41 pages of it to read it later today, but everything I've read about the Annan Plan in this article this morning is spot on and these are the reasons as to why the 2004 AP was going to be a bigger disaster for Cypriots in the near future than our present situation. It is time for all Cypriots, TC's and GC's to map out their own "road map" for the future of the island and it's citizens as one country, one nation and one people, and the way to achieve that, is by addressing each others concerns in an honest way without one imposing their will over the other in an unfair or undemocratic ways.

It is time for all the NeoPartitionist and NeoNationalist to see this reality, and work towards peace and unity rather than hatred and division.

Peace and harmony is the only way forward.
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18050
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

Postby miltiades » Tue May 13, 2008 9:54 am

Kikapu wrote:Thanks Kifeas,

I have just copied the article, all 41 pages of it to read it later today, but everything I've read about the Annan Plan in this article this morning is spot on and these are the reasons as to why the 2004 AP was going to be a bigger disaster for Cypriots in the near future than our present situation. It is time for all Cypriots, TC's and GC's to map out their own "road map" for the future of the island and it's citizens as one country, one nation and one people, and the way to achieve that, is by addressing each others concerns in an honest way without one imposing their will over the other in an unfair or undemocratic ways.

It is time for all the NeoPartitionist and NeoNationalist to see this reality, and work towards peace and unity rather than hatred and division.

Peace and harmony is the only way forward.

PEACE AND HARMONY IS THE ONLY WAY FORWARD !!!
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Next

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests