Cyprus-Forum.com

[Kikapu]

By just reading this page I counted a backgammon and a gammon. Congrats kikapu

Welcome back Pyro,

Yeah, that's a lot of HAM !! :lol:

[Pyrpolizer]

Hi guys... Alex, Kikapu, and boomerang in particular.
No my friends I am not coming back, I was just passing by.
I am still in the process of getting detoxicated from the forum....

[bilako22]

You cannot accept that the views of VP represents the majority of TCs and yours just represents the few that failed to benefit from the spoils of war.

yours just represents the few that failed to benefit from the spoils of war

I don't know whether VP appreciates your comments or looking for a place to hide in shame.

Take my word for it bilako22, you are not helping him.

So, what you are saying is, VP and the majority of the TC's all have benefited from the "spoils of war", and if that is the case, then no one should be offended if I use the words such as "morally corrupted" "corrupt society" "NeoPartitionist" "anti peace" "Animal Farm" and so on, because who would in their right minds would want to have peace and has to return all their ill gotten "spoils of war".??

I don't think you are helping the TC cause at all. I'm surprised you are not "whip lashed" yet for your comments.

Just out of interest, on what grounds to you assume that VP represents the majority, and I do not mean the majority living in the north, but majority True TC's. If you are talking about simple majority of the north, then I would agree with you, because that would be a no brainer.........thanks.

VP can look after himself without any support , or otherwise . I used the term "spoils of war" specifically to explain your one-sided contributions .

[bilako22]

Once again you are making a mistake and will fall into your own trap by saying, that those who did not benefit from the spoils of war, are now seeing things from the point of the GC view.!!

Does that then mean, that if one sees from the TC point of view, that they must have benefited from the spoils of war.!!

Learn to be careful in what you accuse others of, because in the end, your accusations will tell more about yourself than others in what they may or may not have committed.

Answer my question first before you want to move onto the "Haram" issues.

You have not answered my question . Ma question and your ambiguous answer leads to many other questions.Did your mother or father attempt to receive compensated land or not? Where do they live . Where do you live . What has happened to your land in the South?Have you been to the TRNC recently ? Have you done army service?
I suspect your logic is as sound as your definitions of haram and temporary.

Just exactly which "comic book" did you arise from, because you are getting to be very funny.

Just admit it bilako22, that you have trapped your "nuts" in a vice and now can't go forward or backwards to get out of answer my questions put to you, because either way, you are "toast".

Your question was answered very directly without any complications, so I thought, and that is, NO we did not benefit from the "spoils of war" and you asking more questions as to WHY NOT, is not going to help you. The opportunities were there, but we chose not to act on them.

If you just want to ask questions and not answer the ones put to you, perhaps you can start posting with "unitedwestand", because he too likes to ask and not answer questions. That should be a very exhilarating discussion between the two of you...............not.

Anyway, I don't have time to waste with your groundless assumptions of me. Since you have not answered my questions put to you, and since we are not in a court room, then your silence is very deafening of your quilt with you benefiting from the "spoils of war", therefore you may now keep the "immoral awards" presented to you the other night, permanently.!!

It has been interesting in "not talking" with you.

I am not suprised that you do not answer my questions . You my friend are a selfish dishonest Tc who is out for revenge on you own community for falsely blaming for your failures in life.

[bilako22]

I would have thought that to most readers it is pretty obvious that the GC and Tc people of Cyprus need to be kept separate for their own good .

I thought I was done pointing out errors with your "assumptions & assertions", but not quiet yet I guess.

TC's and GC's have lived as a mixed community for centuries. Some villages from majority to entirely were TC's and some villages from majority to entirely were GC's all over the map of Cyprus. Only less than 10% of the history between the two communities has there been a complete separation (in recent times), therefore your claim is not accurate to say the least.

You are now 0-4.!!

You have the score back to front . As regards your mixed community contribution it is utter rubbish. The Greeks and Turks have been separating from each other for hudreds of years which is obvious by comparing the number of mixed villages in 1960 to those 200 hundred years before. Turks and Greeks , by 1960 , made it obvious that they preferred to live in their own communities rather than the Cypriot one .

it should also be pointed out the international community came to a fair and just solution in 2004 that the Greeks rejected.

And your false "assumptions & assertions" continues with the above statement. There was nothing fair and just solution in the AP 2004, since it was turned down. Had it been a fair and just solution, it would have passed.!!

Your logic is crap. It was because the solution was fair and just that the Greeks turned it down. They wanted a solution that allowed them to dominate the island .

You are now 0-5 .!! :lol:

[bilako22]

I would have thought that to most readers it is pretty obvious that the GC and Tc people of Cyprus need to be kept separate for their own good .

I thought I was done pointing out errors with your "assumptions & assertions", but not quiet yet I guess.

TC's and GC's have lived as a mixed community for centuries. Some villages from majority to entirely were TC's and some villages from majority to entirely were GC's all over the map of Cyprus. Only less than 10% of the history between the two communities has there been a complete separation (in recent times), therefore your claim is not accurate to say the least.

You are now 0-4.!!

it should also be pointed out the international community came to a fair and just solution in 2004 that the Greeks rejected.

And your false "assumptions & assertions" continues with the above statement. There was nothing fair and just solution in the AP 2004, since it was turned down. Had it been a fair and just solution, it would have passed.!!

You are now 0-5 .!! :lol:

By just reading this page I counted a backgammon and a gammon. Congrats kikapu

You really must stop licking his arse.

[bilako22]

By just reading this page I counted a backgammon and a gammon. Congrats kikapu

Welcome back Pyro,

Yeah, that's a lot of HAM !! :lol:

For Petes sake guys , stop licking each others arse.

[boomerang]

By just reading this page I counted a backgammon and a gammon. Congrats kikapu

Welcome back Pyro,

Yeah, that's a lot of HAM !! :lol:

For Petes sake guys , stop licking each others arse.

Jealous?...Don't worry plenty of statues in the fowl country for you to lick...

[Kikapu]

I would have thought that to most readers it is pretty obvious that the GC and Tc people of Cyprus need to be kept separate for their own good .

I thought I was done pointing out errors with your "assumptions & assertions", but not quiet yet I guess.

TC's and GC's have lived as a mixed community for centuries. Some villages from majority to entirely were TC's and some villages from majority to entirely were GC's all over the map of Cyprus. Only less than 10% of the history between the two communities has there been a complete separation (in recent times), therefore your claim is not accurate to say the least.

You are now 0-4.!!

You have the score back to front . As regards your mixed community contribution it is utter rubbish. The Greeks and Turks have been separating from each other for hudreds of years which is obvious by comparing the number of mixed villages in 1960 to those 200 hundred years before. Turks and Greeks , by 1960 , made it obvious that they preferred to live in their own communities rather than the Cypriot one .

it should also be pointed out the international community came to a fair and just solution in 2004 that the Greeks rejected.

And your false "assumptions & assertions" continues with the above statement. There was nothing fair and just solution in the AP 2004, since it was turned down. Had it been a fair and just solution, it would have passed.!!

Your logic is crap. It was because the solution was fair and just that the Greeks turned it down. They wanted a solution that allowed them to dominate the island .

You are now 0-5 .!! :lol:

Bilako22,

This is your second warning for you to stop writing your post mixed in with mine. One more and I will ask the admin to sort you out. It is not that difficult to place your response post at the end of my post, is it,?? I just don't want people to think that I think like you, you know, someone who has benefited from "spoils of war".!!

Don't forget, this was your second and last warning.!!

[bilako22]

I would have thought that to most readers it is pretty obvious that the GC and Tc people of Cyprus need to be kept separate for their own good .

I thought I was done pointing out errors with your "assumptions & assertions", but not quiet yet I guess.

TC's and GC's have lived as a mixed community for centuries. Some villages from majority to entirely were TC's and some villages from majority to entirely were GC's all over the map of Cyprus. Only less than 10% of the history between the two communities has there been a complete separation (in recent times), therefore your claim is not accurate to say the least.

You are now 0-4.!!

You have the score back to front . As regards your mixed community contribution it is utter rubbish. The Greeks and Turks have been separating from each other for hudreds of years which is obvious by comparing the number of mixed villages in 1960 to those 200 hundred years before. Turks and Greeks , by 1960 , made it obvious that they preferred to live in their own communities rather than the Cypriot one .

it should also be pointed out the international community came to a fair and just solution in 2004 that the Greeks rejected.

And your false "assumptions & assertions" continues with the above statement. There was nothing fair and just solution in the AP 2004, since it was turned down. Had it been a fair and just solution, it would have passed.!!

Your logic is crap. It was because the solution was fair and just that the Greeks turned it down. They wanted a solution that allowed them to dominate the island .

You are now 0-5 .!! :lol:

Bilako22,

This is your second warning for you to stop writing your post mixed in with mine. One more and I will ask the admin to sort you out. It is not that difficult to place your response post at the end of my post, is it,?? I just don't want people to think that I think like you, you know, someone who has benefited from "spoils of war".!!

Don't forget, this was your second and last warning.!!

Oh please , I beg you , give me one more chance.