Paphitis wrote:miltiades wrote:Eliko wrote:I am somewhat inclined to favour the views expressed by Get Real (although a little less forcefulness in some areas of his strong opinions might entice members to support them more readily) since I think he has a better grasp of the realities of general warfare and it's structures.
Miltiades is doubtless sincere in his beliefs, unfortunately he is wide open to political chicanery and I think we have all had quite enough of that.
On a lighter note, Miltiades has an advantage over Get Real in that he is apparently quite fond of his wine, that being the case (although Get Real is slightly ahead at this stage of the poll) he can find some solace via imbibement should he be defeated whereas poor Get Real will have little to console him should HE be the vanquished.
On a lighter- lighter note, the slang term for 'Wine' is 'Plonk', I do wonder if it would be in order to refer to one who has a strong predilection for the juice of the grape, as a 'Plonker', an interesting play on words don't you think ?.
Eliko , the whole point is that most forum members do not consider war as a means of achieving a solution to the Cyprus problem as advocated by GR , who is convinced that Cyprus , perhaps with the help of Greece , and this is Perhaps with a capital P. He is also convinced that Cyprus is now a world player and if it has to it can take on Turkey and defeat it. This is pure nonsense and any one with slightly more brain than GR can see how ridiculous such assertions are . The same assertions were made by the military coup leaders way back in 1974 , remember the famous words , "we shall throw them in the sea !!!
My position has never altered , I have never deviated from my position that the solution to the Cyprus problem must be through negotiations and the leverage of the EU as well as the International community .
You state above re: GR "since I think he has a better grasp of the realities of general warfare and it's structures."""
Are you referring the grasp of world events and terrorism as in Bin Laden and the suicide bombers that you both admire ?? Is it his "grasp" of polemics that convinces him that Cyprus can take on Turkey and defeat her , thus achieving the objective and liberating by force the occupied areas ? I have in the past expressed my astonishment at the wasted education that you received , once again I repeat what a bloody waste of an education.
I say this not because you also think on the same lines as this moron , but because of your above grotesque statement about a man who thinks that the Cyprus nation can achieve liberation of the occupied areas by defeating Turkey !!In an international specialist forum dealing with international warfare , you would be laughed at and ridiculed !!
ps. Do note that so far the majority that have voted are against war , I believe , taking his own vote , his support is less then 40% .
ps no.2 . what does imbibement mean ? !!!
Are you saying that there is absolutely no chance that Cyprus and Greece can defeat Turkey in an open conflict?
I am not advocating a war here but I am just asking whether you believe that Turkey can be defeated by Greece and Cyprus should such a conflict occur.
In short NO , Greece and Cyprus can inflict substantial collateral damage but could never defeat a nation of 75 million , and one that has the backing of the USA and Brittain , no ifs and buts Turkey is a huge military machine , it may very well suffer heavy loses but it can not be ultimately defeated .