Viewpoint wrote:Kikapu wrote:VP,
My complaints are against Morally Corrupted and TMT Terrorist Mentality individuals such as yourself who does not support any peace in Cyprus. What you support is division and partition even under the disguised "peace plan" such as Annan Plan. The day there is true peace in Cyprus, is the day I'm certain you will leave the island, because you will not be able to bear the country uniting between the GC's and the TC's as a Independent country. TC's deserve being part of the West and living within the International Laws and not the situation they have been forced to live under now. The freedom to the TC's will come when people like you will stop coercing them in creating a "corrupt society" and instead form a "honest society" and are full equal members of the EU and the Cypriot society and identity.
Equality of the 2 communities will only come when outsiders such as yourself but out and leave us alone and stop telling us what to do. If the alternative is becoming a minority in a GC state then we do not want any part of it we have red lines and any new plan will have to take those into account.
Is your request for those living outside Cyprus should butt out only applies to me or any one else.
Have you sent the same request to Zan yet.??
What about all the other newbies that seems to have "mushroomed" out of nowhere lately. Almost all of them live abroad you know.!!
I'm going to answer your above question as honestly as I always do, which seems to irritate the shit out of you as always, then you start calling me names, but since you asked for it, you are going to get it.
The problem with the "TRNC" is, they have put red lines to anything and everything from the Turkish Troop withdrawal, the settlers must all stay, to veto vote, 50-50 power share, the north to become pure TC state under "virgin birth" concept, only certain number of GC's can reside in the north, the GC's can't vote in the north and on and on and on, so how do you expect to have any kind of an agreement from the other side if no red lines can't be crossed.? My guess is the other side will tell the "TRNC" to take it and shove it, which will give you the results you want, which is a no settlement. Have I missed something so far.??
Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't most of what you want as a red line above are in the 1960 Constitution which you do not want to go back to because;
a) did not work in the past
b) you don't want them in a unitary state now
c) you want all the 1960 benefits as well as a pure TC state in the form of a Confederacy with "virgin birth" as well as limiting GC's returning to their homes in the north and limiting their democratic rights to vote in the north
Can you please enlighten me just what exactly the GC's will get in return for giving the "TRNC" what I wrote in "c", other than some land that belongs to them legally anyway. If this is what you call negotiations for a settlement and expect positive results to come out, then something is wrong with me in not comprehending the whole "peace process". Please tell me what is it that I'm missing, or I'm a being a GC again with these questions, or worse a traitor for not believing that the GC's will actually accept all these and not tell the TC's to "go to hell". Perhaps it will be easier for you to answer these questions if the shoe was on the other foot. What exactly would you be telling the GC's under the exact situation. Would it be perhaps "go to hell".?? Perhaps I'm wrong and I should not assume that the TC's would say such a thing.
We are all waiting for you to enlighten us VP.