Eliko wrote:Conor, not wishing to appear as a prophet of doom (although your complaint does have all the hallmarks of misfortune) I cannot but help thinking that your case took a serious down-turn when you resorted to insult and abuse in the early stages of negotiations..
Cypriot people do not take kindly to such behaviour, particularly when their families become the target of such affront, nor do the courts (whether in Cyprus or elsewhere).
Your web-site may also prove to be something of a liability in your quest for justice since it would appear to be something of an overall condemnation of ALL speculators and developers, notwithstanding the fact that you also make disparaging remarks about the Legal profession and the Judiciary.
You may well see your campaign as a means to save others from experiencing similar difficulties to your own (and that is commendable) but do not assume that because of the support you are receiving you are strengthening your case, in fact, you may even be weakening it.
Street protests and rallies have failed miserably in dealing with greater issues than you have highlighted, I would urge caution rather than such degrees of optimism you have and are displaying.
The actual case of GBH will be dealt with as a seperate issue and you may well have the satisfaction of seeing the perpetrators punished for their actions, I doubt if the outcome of that case will significantly influence judgement on the major issue.
Realizing that you will not receive my views with much favour, I would like to conclude by saying that I do wish you well in your quest for justice, although I do feel that you may well have compromised the strength of your action by resorting to insult in the first instance, I do wonder if, at this late stage, abject apologies might be a surer route in ensuring satisfaction than a contest in court.
Hi Eliko,
Thanks for your comment. I don't have time for a full response at the moment but I think you are reading the document as a statement of FACTS...its not.
There were no insults from my side in the early stages of negotiation... That didn't come from me until a Year after the FIRST assault. Within that year they had RESOLD my house. Lied to the court. and refused to simply give us back our money.
Its all up on my website in minute detail where I have a comprehensive timeline backed up by evidence (and on YouTube) They have nothing because it's all lies. If you need me to point to specific documents then I will at a later time.
I will just quote these words from another forum. I'm busy preparing for the weekends events so may not have time to respond today. Cheers.
a wise man in another forum wrote:The court is not saying that this is a true version of events, merely that someone has gone to the court and sworn on oath that this is a true version of events, and the court has witnessed them making this statement.
If the person making the affidavit is later shown to have knowingly said something that is not true in the statement, they can then be charged with perjury (as if they had made such a false statement during court proceedings).
The SBA court administers the SBA area which is much larger than the actual bases see the map at:
http://www.sba.mod.uk/admin.htm (click on maps)
There is also a description of the courts activities at this site.