Bananiot wrote:Piratis, is it difficult to understand that in the real world there are no solutions but options? Those that have not realised this simple fact are now extinct.
Option 1, disguised partition ( Annan plan):
- Give to the Turks officially 1/3rd of Cyprus
- Give to the Turks control of the whole Cyprus.
- 10s of thousands of settlers staying in Cyprus, multiplying and spreading on the whole island.
- Greek Cypriots loose their international voice
- Turkey is off the hook, not having to pay a single cent.
- Some land is returned, some 10s of thousands of refugees returned to it.
- Prospects for the future: Diminished possibility of taking any more of our land back since we signed it away. Dysfunctional undemocratic governing that can lead to conflicts and probably more bloodshed.
option 2, official partition:
- Turks officially keep 1/3rd of Cyprus, but probably less than option 1
- Turkey has no control over the whole Cyprus
- Settlers stay in Cyprus, but only in the north part
- Greek Cypriots retain their international voice
- Some land is returned, probably more than option 1
- Turkey is off the hook, not having to pay a single cent.
- Some land is returned, some 10s of refugees return, probably more than option 1
- Prospects for the future: Diminished possibility of taking any more of our land back since we signed it away. Functional democratic governing that can lead to more progress.
option 3, insisting on a fair solution
- turkey keeps 1/3rd of our country
illegally and has consequences as a result.
- Turkey has no control over the whole Cyprus
- Settlers stay in Cyprus, but only in the north part
- Greek Cypriots retain their international voice
- No land is currently returned
- Turkey maintains its responsibility for her illegalities and she is obligated to pay compensations to our refugees.
- Prospects for the future: We keep the right over all of our lands, and since we would not sign them away we can take them back under a difference balance of power. Meanwhile we keep a democratic and functional system, a good economy and we progress.
So, there are the current options Bananiot. Non of them is good, but obviously some are better than other. Also option 3 allows the possibility for other better options in the future, while the other 2 options limit such possibility.
The
worst option is option 1. If you think that the balance of power can change in our favor in the future then you go with option 3. If you think that the balance of power is impossible to change to our favor then you go with option 2. But only an idiot would go for option 1.