Boomerang,
No. Do you ?
CopperLine wrote:No Paphitis you are quite mistaken when you write :The TCs are welcome to have their property back after they have proven no illegal ownership of stolen GC property.
A claimant does not have to prove the innocence of fellow community members before seeking remedy. This would be an absurd requirement which would cripple any legal system which rested on such a procedure.
For example, I'm a TC from Limmasol who wants to claim back my land. You are saying that I have to show that other TCs who I have never met nor have any knowledge of did not occupy stolen land before I can recover my land. For example, you are a GC from Kyrenia, who wants to claim back you land. You are saying that you have to show that other GCs who you have never met nor have any knowledge of did not occupy my land in Limmasol before you can recover your land. Holy moly !
CopperLine wrote:No Paphitis you are quite mistaken when you write :The TCs are welcome to have their property back after they have proven no illegal ownership of stolen GC property.
A claimant does not have to prove the innocence of fellow community members before seeking remedy. This would be an absurd requirement which would cripple any legal system which rested on such a procedure.
For example, I'm a TC from Limmasol who wants to claim back my land. You are saying that I have to show that other TCs who I have never met nor have any knowledge of did not occupy stolen land before I can recover my land. For example, you are a GC from Kyrenia, who wants to claim back you land. You are saying that you have to show that other GCs who you have never met nor have any knowledge of did not occupy my land in Limmasol before you can recover your land. Holy moly !
CopperLine wrote:What broad statement are you talking about ? What has this got to do with your allegation of stupidity ?
CopperLine wrote:No Boomerang. It is not that you are stupid it is that you (and Paphitis) are mistaken.
Consider an analogy from a domestic court. In a criminal (or civil) proceeding the victim or a crime or tort does not have to prove that they themselves are innocent any wrongdoing before they can take action against their respondent or accused. For example, supposing I was accused of the murder of a distant cousin of yours, and your family rightly wants legal remedy. You do not have to prove that you - a very distant cousin - are innocent of any and all possible offences against me before you can proceed in an action against me. Our respective other crimes vis. one another are, essentially, irrelevant.
That is unless you support the idea of collective punishment - which is fundamentally illegal under international law.
If you want to claim you land in Limmasol, you must prove that YOU have not stolen GC property. Once this is done you are free to claim your land. If you have stolen GC property, then you could be prosecuted.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest