The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Legalities and Illegalities ... Mean Nothing Anymore!

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby Paphitis » Sat Apr 19, 2008 5:43 pm

boomerang wrote:Bruce Ruxton's idiotology died a long time ago and the union Jack will surely and shortly disappear making room for a new country to be born...


Paphitis I want you to really think about the above statement before you come back to me with a reply...

PS...your avatat doesn't really match your ideals...


What ideals are you referring to?
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Postby boomerang » Sat Apr 19, 2008 5:47 pm

Paphitis wrote:
boomerang wrote:Bruce Ruxton's idiotology died a long time ago and the union Jack will surely and shortly disappear making room for a new country to be born...


Paphitis I want you to really think about the above statement before you come back to me with a reply...

PS...your avatat doesn't really match your ideals...


What ideals are you referring to?


First address the primary statement before we go into the secondary statement
User avatar
boomerang
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7337
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 5:56 am

Postby Paphitis » Sat Apr 19, 2008 5:51 pm

boomerang wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
boomerang wrote:Bruce Ruxton's idiotology died a long time ago and the union Jack will surely and shortly disappear making room for a new country to be born...


Paphitis I want you to really think about the above statement before you come back to me with a reply...

PS...your avatat doesn't really match your ideals...


What ideals are you referring to?


First answer the primary statement before we go into the secondary statement...


Australia became a nation in 1901. What does the departure of the Union Jack got to do with the price of eggs. Maybe it is the republican issue?

I inform you that I support a republic in Australia. However I do not see it as a very important issue.

Forgive me, but I am not sure what you are getting at.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Postby boomerang » Sat Apr 19, 2008 5:53 pm

Paphitis wrote:
boomerang wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
boomerang wrote:Bruce Ruxton's idiotology died a long time ago and the union Jack will surely and shortly disappear making room for a new country to be born...


Paphitis I want you to really think about the above statement before you come back to me with a reply...

PS...your avatat doesn't really match your ideals...


What ideals are you referring to?


First answer the primary statement before we go into the secondary statement...


Australia became a nation in 1901. What does the departure of the Union Jack got to do with the price of eggs. Maybe it is the republican issue?

I inform you that I support a republic in Australia. However I do not see it as a very important issue.

Forgive me, but I am not sure what you are getting at.


Can I ask your age?

Are you a proud Australian or a pseudo proud Australian?...
User avatar
boomerang
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7337
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 5:56 am

Postby Paphitis » Sat Apr 19, 2008 5:56 pm

boomerang wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
boomerang wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
boomerang wrote:Bruce Ruxton's idiotology died a long time ago and the union Jack will surely and shortly disappear making room for a new country to be born...


Paphitis I want you to really think about the above statement before you come back to me with a reply...

PS...your avatat doesn't really match your ideals...


What ideals are you referring to?


First answer the primary statement before we go into the secondary statement...


Australia became a nation in 1901. What does the departure of the Union Jack got to do with the price of eggs. Maybe it is the republican issue?

I inform you that I support a republic in Australia. However I do not see it as a very important issue.

Forgive me, but I am not sure what you are getting at.


Can I ask your age?

Are you a proud Australian or a pseudo proud Australian?...


For security reasons, I have sent you a PM.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Postby Paphitis » Sat Apr 19, 2008 6:03 pm

boomerang wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
boomerang wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
boomerang wrote:Bruce Ruxton's idiotology died a long time ago and the union Jack will surely and shortly disappear making room for a new country to be born...


Paphitis I want you to really think about the above statement before you come back to me with a reply...

PS...your avatat doesn't really match your ideals...


What ideals are you referring to?


First answer the primary statement before we go into the secondary statement...


Australia became a nation in 1901. What does the departure of the Union Jack got to do with the price of eggs. Maybe it is the republican issue?

I inform you that I support a republic in Australia. However I do not see it as a very important issue.

Forgive me, but I am not sure what you are getting at.


Can I ask your age?

Are you a proud Australian or a pseudo proud Australian?...


Before we get into a very full on debate, first consider this:

You can not build a nation by erasing and denying your history and identity. In order to move forward you must first look back (at your history). I beleive that this is pertanent to your silly Bruce Ruxton question.

Now for the second part of the question.

What ideals are you referring to?
Last edited by Paphitis on Sat Apr 19, 2008 6:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Postby Paphitis » Sat Apr 19, 2008 6:13 pm

Someone who has served Australia for 11 long years in the RAAF is a very proud Australian.

Boomers, I would love to hang around and play, but I am logging off.

We can continue this another time.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Postby Oracle » Sat Apr 19, 2008 6:21 pm

A country is like a brain ... the more you add to it the richer it becomes.

Old stuff does not have to be tossed out for new stuff to find a place.

Old memories, like ancient cultures can be utilised to enrich newly acquired ones ... thereby creating a greater whole ... then the sum of the parts.

The foundations of an old inherited culture provide stability and strength from which newly added cultures can grow thereby creating dynamic new permutations!

Back to fusion and blending! ...
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby GeorgeV97qaue » Tue Apr 22, 2008 5:07 pm

unitedwestand wrote:
bill cobbett wrote:
unitedwestand wrote:
bill cobbett wrote:Yes, why is it that some members claim this peculiar disregard for law and seek to justify some kind of jungle law or the American wild west lack of law in the old cowboy days?

What strange and perverted justification is there for this view?

I am pretty sure that some of these members live near me here in London, GB enjoying the freedoms of a reasonably law respecting place. Why shouldn't they feel the same should apply to Cy?

Could it be that they benefit in some way from the situation on the ground in Cy and from these "spoils of war" stolen for them by the murdering rapists of the Turkish army?

----

....Embargoed from the north by the prisoner killing, lawless Turkish army


Maybe its because the Brits never attacked us. Never tried ethnically cleansing us or have never spat at us calling us dirty Turks.

You do the crime now shut up and do the time. The shit you are in is the result of your actions. Nobody else can be blamed.


I am a Brit mate/matess born, bred and most likely die here in London, England.

Never called anyone a Turk, dirty Turk, B'stard Turk or any other combination, but despite that the nice Turkish army felt it ok to show their regard for the laws of war by raping my late grandmother and two aunts (may they and their attackers find peace). Par for the course in Cy in that summer of 74 I suppose.

As for the "crime" any sane person would only add rewriting history to lack of regard for the law.

Ethnic Cleansing? another rewrite of history.

So we have rewriting history to add to disregard for the law.

Next you'll be telling us that black is white and white is black !!!! :shock:


---
...rubbed out of the north by a rewriting of history


Black is black. White is white. Greeks are Greeks, Greek Cypriots are Greeks. Never trust them, they are selfish, liars, racist and the most difficult race to reason with. Worst than the Jews. now that's saying something.


I think the turks are the worst race on the earth. You believe your own bollocks you spout. Yes the GC's did want enosis and killed TC's but dont sit their and say you turks never harmed anyone. How many Kurds and Armenians did the turks kill but hey let's forget about that.

How many GC's were killed by the TC extremists back in the 60's oh lets forget about that. How many civilians did the Turks kill and rape in 1974 oh let forget about that.

You make me sick you ignorant twat. Hope one day your family suffers as much as the my family did in 1974.

If you tossers didnt side with Brits nothing would of happen to you. But hey the turk are always right. The time will come when Turks will get what's coming to them.
GeorgeV97qaue
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 370
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:57 pm

Postby Oracle » Tue Apr 22, 2008 5:57 pm

GeorgeV97qaue wrote:
unitedwestand wrote:
bill cobbett wrote:
unitedwestand wrote:
bill cobbett wrote:Yes, why is it that some members claim this peculiar disregard for law and seek to justify some kind of jungle law or the American wild west lack of law in the old cowboy days?

What strange and perverted justification is there for this view?

I am pretty sure that some of these members live near me here in London, GB enjoying the freedoms of a reasonably law respecting place. Why shouldn't they feel the same should apply to Cy?

Could it be that they benefit in some way from the situation on the ground in Cy and from these "spoils of war" stolen for them by the murdering rapists of the Turkish army?

----

....Embargoed from the north by the prisoner killing, lawless Turkish army


Maybe its because the Brits never attacked us. Never tried ethnically cleansing us or have never spat at us calling us dirty Turks.

You do the crime now shut up and do the time. The shit you are in is the result of your actions. Nobody else can be blamed.


I am a Brit mate/matess born, bred and most likely die here in London, England.

Never called anyone a Turk, dirty Turk, B'stard Turk or any other combination, but despite that the nice Turkish army felt it ok to show their regard for the laws of war by raping my late grandmother and two aunts (may they and their attackers find peace). Par for the course in Cy in that summer of 74 I suppose.

As for the "crime" any sane person would only add rewriting history to lack of regard for the law.

Ethnic Cleansing? another rewrite of history.

So we have rewriting history to add to disregard for the law.

Next you'll be telling us that black is white and white is black !!!! :shock:


---
...rubbed out of the north by a rewriting of history


Black is black. White is white. Greeks are Greeks, Greek Cypriots are Greeks. Never trust them, they are selfish, liars, racist and the most difficult race to reason with. Worst than the Jews. now that's saying something.


I think the turks are the worst race on the earth. You believe your own bollocks you spout. Yes the GC's did want enosis and killed TC's but dont sit their and say you turks never harmed anyone. How many Kurds and Armenians did the turks kill but hey let's forget about that.

How many GC's were killed by the TC extremists back in the 60's oh lets forget about that. How many civilians did the Turks kill and rape in 1974 oh let forget about that.

You make me sick you ignorant twat. Hope one day your family suffers as much as the my family did in 1974.

If you tossers didnt side with Brits nothing would of happen to you. But hey the turk are always right. The time will come when Turks will get what's coming to them.


Unitedwestand is trying to show bravado as they try to forget the guilt and shame associated with their actions.

You are right George, their time will come and they will get what they deserve for their hubris, fear not.

I was admiring a 700 year old olive tree today. It was already a few hundred years old before the Ottomans even arrived.

It's outlived the Venetians. It's outlived the Ottomans, it's outlived the British rule and it outlived the demanding era of the TCs ... a TC's empty house is close by. And soon the era of the "trnc" will be over and the olive tree will still be here along with us natives, who love this country and want to keep it whole. We will still be here as we have been for thousands of years with our country, once again for Cypriots..
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests