Piratis wrote:Saint Jimmy, what we have now is bad, what they want us to accept is worst.
What we have now is hope for something better, what they want us to accept has no hope.
So what is better:
bad + hope
or
worst + no hope
????
'What they want us to accept is worse' is just your personal opinion, which I don't share. But even if we agreed on that, there's always that annoying counter-argument that won't let me take sides: what we have now could be leading down the same road that the Greeks of Asia Minor took (and where are they now? What hope of return do they have?).
What they're asking us to accept (even if we agreed that it's worse than what we have now) may just take us down the right road, because (and this is
my personal opinion, which
you don't share, I guess) we are carrying the experience (and the lost lives and the suffering) of the last 42 years on our backs. Do you really believe that, even with a bad solution, the two communities will find themselves in an adversarial position again? I don't. And then, once we've become convinced that we're not after our own hidden agenda (neither TCs are after taksim any more, nor are we after domination/annihilation/whatever of the TC community), we can start working on the political problem. Only then can it be solved, instead of closed. For now, we are in desperate need of a start.
What's certain, in my book, is that the political problem can't be solved until the attitudes have changed. And the only way for attitudes to change, is for co-operation to be forced upon us (that's how I saw the A-Plan; not as the 'perfect plan'). We can't do it ourselves. We are way too poisoned by now.
That's how I see hope.
P.S.: I'm not trying to pick a long, heated debate on this. We disagree on very basic issues and we'll probably never agree. I'm just trying to get you to understand what I'm saying, just as I try to understand what you're saying.