The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


USAK Report on Cyprus Issue

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

USAK Report on Cyprus Issue

Postby halil » Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:20 pm

Long-lasting Cyprus issue has turned into a form that has been changing dimension in the course of time due to the involvement of different actors in different time periods and that even propositions on a comprehensive settlement seems to remain inadequate to overcome the long-term resistance of the parties. The long- lasting characteristic of the issue causes it to be more complicated and international actors to intervene the problem. Due to these features, the problem requires a multi- component formula whose all components need to be conducted simultaneously.
The Cyprus issue experienced serious breaking points, which caused the change in the way the issue is going, in the course of time. The process of Greek Cyprus’ membership during 1990s up to 2004 following the Greek one in 1980s and referendum on the Annan Plan in 2004 are among these crucial terms, leaving particular marks on the issue. Results of these breaking points have mostly been against Turkish side and made this issue a key factor for Turkey-EU relations as well as one of the basic problems of Turkish foreign policy for more than 50 years The most important obstacle in front of a possible settlement based on “reciprocity principle” under the auspices of United Nations has become the “Europeanization” of the problem i.e. the EU membership of Greece and Greek Cyprus. These memberships caused the solution process to be stuck into a deadlock. On the other hand, the results of the Annan Plan referendum also became another breaking point in terms of changing the images of the parties in international arena about which one is in favor of deadlock or a solution. After the referendum it is possible to say that the ‘psychological superiority’ in international platform for the first time was turned in favor of Turkish side. Although Turkish side has no longer been accepted as primarily responsible from the deadlock regarding the solution and has captured the ‘physiological superiority’, it is not possible to say that this international sympathy helped the Northern Cyprus to be recognized as an independent unit, and the isolations on the island still have not been lifted. In contrast, since realization of the accession to the Union without any condition for a comprehensive solution makes the Greek Cypriots be inaction, Greek Cypriots have been in no effort of taking sincere steps in favor of a settlement.

As of 2007, especially the conjuncture under the shadow of Kosovo’s independence had affected Greek Cypriots in presidential elections and national will showed a tendency in the direction of the defeat of Papadopoulos who has an important role in the rejection of the Annan Plan. The election process which has resulted in victory of Christofias has revitalized the hopes for revitalization of negotiations and gave the signals of the beginning of a new period. The two leaders of the island came together on March 21, which is a concrete sign of beginning of a new period. Opening of Lokmaci Gate, formation of technical committee and working groups to complete technical preparations are the first steps on the way to a settlement. This process, through which it is expected to start negotiations for a permanent solution, however, carries some question marks. The forthcoming process will be a “sincerity test” both for international society and for the two sides of the Island as well. This process requires TRNC and Turkey to pursue a proactive policy and to form “multi-alternative plans” that are the products of multi-dimensional thoughts, because the process usually turns into a “war of nerves” and so it requires sides to be patient and to generate alternatives. Negotiating without preparing alternative plans causes sides to act in accordance with misdirection and makes sides powerless. Proactive policies, on the other hand, are important to take the initiative to direct negotiations. As a result alternative plans are crucial in this process to shape the negotiations on the basis of UN parameters.

It is a fact that, uncompromising attitude of Greece and the accession of Greek Cypriots left the responsibility of the solution on Turkish side to a large extent. Currently, Greek Cypriots act like the Greece of 1980s against Turkey by using EU decision taking institutions as a platform to refute the claims of Turkish side. Therefore Cyprus issue forms an important obstacle in front of Turkey-EU relations. In this sense, Turkey needs to develop a healthy crisis management to be able to form a stable policy. Before all else, an effective crisis management, however, requires an identification of the problem with the support of historical facts and with an objective manner.

In this context, the aim of USAK report, entitled as “Alternative Approaches for the Cyprus Issue: Multi-Component Step Model”, is to search for alternative solutions by analyzing the history of the issue, and by preparing road maps in the short and long run to deal with it. In contrast to classical approaches, trying to show the need for a multi-component approach especially after the February 2008 elections of Greek Cypriots and to guide sides within the context of such a kind of model are among the aims of this report. In terms of both abolishing the isolations on TRNC and preventing Turkey-EU negotiations to be stuck into a deadlock, it is expected that such a kind of crisis management will make positive contributions to a possible settlement for the issue. In today’s world in which civil society and non-governmental organizations take the role of policy making, suggestions in the USAK report are expected to contribute to the solution in that new period of negotiation process. The main points of the suggestions, which are scrutinized under different titles in the report, are as follows:

• Turkish side should come to the negotiation table with the alternative proposals and openings that would test the sincerity of the Greek side regarding the solution of the Cyprus issue.

• Whether ends with a solution or not; Turkish side, without violating her basic parameters, should leave the negotiation table by showing her sincerity as like in Annan Plan Referendum.

• Turkish side should accelerate the internal transformations in the Island in terms of social, political, judicial, and economic fields, which in turn strengthen the hand of TRNC at the negotiation table.

• Turkish side, who showed her will in favor of solution with the Annan Referendum, should continue to defend a permanent compromise within the framework of UN parameters up until a certain date.

• During this process the sides, the Greek Cypriots and international community, have to take into consideration the possibility that if a solution chance will not occur as of the end of 2009, Turkey and the Turkish side of the island may take the alternative of a “solution based on two partite” into their agenda. In fact, if it will not be possible to break down the deadlock at the end of 2009, there will be an inescapable slowdown, even very serious problems will be experienced on the negotiation process between Turkey and the European Union.

• The process in front of Turkish side requires following a multi-faceted and planned diplomacy. The diplomacy that is going to be pursued by the TRNC should be the product of a multi-faceted policy that composes social, political, economic, and legal affairs simultaneously.

• This multi-faceted policy should involve the attempts and contributions of non-governmental organizations besides formal attempts, and should be proactive in nature and should be supported by research and development programs, educational components, and financial and economic steps.

• The basic “minimum” thresholds and parameters should be determined in an unequivocal and rational way, while pursuing this comprehensive and multi-faceted diplomacy.

• A comprehensive policy is of vital importance in which the internal conflicts are not to be politicized, and the process is conducted consistently.

• The regular meetings and round-table debates, which are formed with the contribution and attendance of ruling and main opposition parties as well as the non-governmental organizations, should be prepared. These meetings are of great importance in harmonizing the different views and ideas.
• The negotiation process should be conducted beyond internal political conflicts. Plans and programs need to be apart from the internal disagreements, but consensus on national interests instead. Having one-voice in international platforms to provide consistency should be one of the core principle to be followed during the process.

• While internal conflicts and disagreements requires to be solved via the indoor discussion platforms, the basis of the foreign policy should be conducted on the basis of common policy papers which are the outcomes of the mentioned discussion platforms.
• The asymmetry in terms of economy between the two sides of the island should be eliminated in favor of Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). In this sense, to bring TRNC as far as possible to a position that could compete with Greek Cypriots in different fields, necessary investments regarding the infrastructure should be materialized.

• Mainly because intensified formal relations would possibly result in a rapprochement between the two sides, the idea that emphasizes “unification is beneficial for all sides” should be strengthened in the public eyes at both sides of the island.

• In order to put the economy of TRNC on a sustainable and stable track, an industrial policy should be formed by combining the ideas of private sector representatives and state authorities in a melting pot.

• For the purpose of helping TRNC to stand on its own foots, full authority and responsibility should be devolved upon the island gradually.

• Direct budget deficit compensation which is performed by Turkey is no longer a sustainable policy. Turkey’s subventions should be project-based and be directed to the sectors that lead to long term job creation and strengthening in infrastructure.

• The law system of the island is performing under the level that it should be. Some fundamental issues such as social security reform, personal property rights, banking system legislation, tax system regulation, and competition law should be re-designed in line with the realities of the age and economic rationale.

• Increasing the economic competition and achieving a sustainable development are of great importance. The necessity of a well-functioning law system is crucial within the context of these two fields, and the compensation of the qualified jurists lack should be materialized in this framework.

• The alternatives paving the way to sectoral diversification should be encouraged.

• Urban planning should be highlighted by taking the revival of the construction sector into consideration. Infrastructure and feasibility studies should be performed in line with the necessities of long term provisions.

• Not only public sector but also private one should attach importance to invest in R&D.

• The qualification of the existing universities on the island should be improved. Besides, by rethinking the positive contributions of the universities on TRNC’s consumption, new ways of attracting international students should be searched.

• The project of water whose feasibility studies have already completed should be implemented. After efficient implementation of watery agriculture projects, possible production excess will makes the prices of raw material less. Therefore, it may help to existence of an incentive factor to install processed product facilities in the north part of the island.

• It is essential to revise the infrastructure of energy constantly, and technological developments should be sustained.

• Concrete projects for installation of natural gas stations should be introduced and if it is necessary the Mediterranean coasts of Turkey should be evaluated within the context of these projects.

• Alternative projects should be implemented in order to decrease the unit costs in transportation and harbor operations.

• There should promptly form an opinion that neither Turkey nor TNRC could invest one more penny to the projects that will remain idle or uncompleted. This fact should be stiffened as “social conscious”.

• An attainable development plan should be prepared and implemented by co-operation of the private and public sectors.

• By drawing attention to social and political spill-over effects of economic recovery stemming from the development of different sectors, the perception of public on economic development should be ensured more clearly.

• The roles of economically empowered sectors on international policies should be taken into consideration.

• There are several responsibilities upon the EU due to its commitments to Northern Cyprus during the Annan Plan referendum both in political and legal terms. In this context, the EU having declared to provide any support to reach a solution should be ready to prevent any blockage of Greek Cypriots in front of the EU’s initiatives.

• In order to implement the clauses of 10. Protocol and Green Line Regulation aiming the economic development of TRNC, the EU should let the direct trade between the Union members and TRNC. Both the EU and its members must sincerely have a real political will on this subject.

• The EU should put pressure on the Greek side to implement the Green Line Regulation pursuant to the statute by warning that it would apply the infringement procedure due to the breach of the Regulation.
• Turks abroad should be organized for serious and effective lobbying activities.

• The focal point of the lobbying activities should be moved from state control to non-governmental initiative and in order to perform effective lobbying, essential initiatives should be given to TRNC simply because they are the ones knowing the needs of the islanders at first hand.

• The fact that there is no more legitimacy of the Greek claims on doctrine of neccessity should be used to disprove the Greek claims in international field since the Greek part of the island prevented the opportunity for a possible normalization process in the island due to their rejection of the Annan Plan. .

• The co-operation possibilities with the international actors should be searched. Especially, the lobbying activities should concentrate on the permanent members of the UN Security Council such as the US, Russia and China by following their Cyprus policies closely.

• In order to lift the isolations on TRNC and to increase the trade relations with the rest of the world, Turkey should accelerate lobbying activities at international platforms and at the summits of international institutions.

• Defending Turkey’s interests and arguments makes it necessary to educate international expert jurists not only in Turkey but also in TRNC. The jurists serving for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs should be satisfied from the economic viewpoint, career path and long term experienced staff should be composed.

• It should be continued to advocate their rights on Turkish properties in Greek side. It should be emphasized that despite Greek authorities are handling Turkish properties under guardianship, they do not pay any charge to the Turkish owners. Also it should be stressed that a majority of performed expropriations were not for public benefit in reality but for private benefits.

• In order to apply European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) by TRNC with justifiable reasons and to use these reasons in a most effective way, jurdicial infrastructure should be developed.

• The property issue should be the part of a comprehensive solution. Also, such a solution should be settled on an approach which would reinforce bi-zonal structure of the island.

• The way to apply to the European Court of Justice should be tried against the Greek obstacles on the implementation of the Green Line Regulation. Before an application to judicial ways, means of evidence should be determined clearly. Also the applications should be based on a comprehensive study thereby which claims are framed up a complete “causal links” in order not to give rise in judicial gaps.

• If aimed at structuring a TRNC standing on her own foots at international area, the Turkish side should avoid the indefinite interventions to the politics of TRNC which would damage “de facto sovereignty”.

• The relations between TRNC’s and Turkey’s armies should be continued within the framework of two strategic partners or two separate national armies.

• Turkey’s guarantorship should be a basic criterion and falling under this criterion should be rejected in any case including a solution based on federation. However, this basic criterion does not cause any objection to devolve the sovereignty in the north side of the island. In order to legitimate the presence of Turkish military in the eyes of international community, less but technologically supported troops could be formed.

• Via the “Security and Defense Agreement” signing between Turkey and TRNC, important openings could be performed.

• It requires for TRNC to act as en bloc in order to defend her claims better in international platforms. In this context, to eliminate the problems stemming from TRNC’s heterogenic structure, a comprehensive and systematic education program should be implemented.

• Another component which would contribute the socio-economic transformation of TRNC and at the same time would help the integration of Northern part to the EU in case of a solution is to take adequate steps in the direction of EU Acquis. For the purpose of contribution to perform socio-economic transformation in a planned frame, as long as overlapping with the basic parameters, the requirements of EU Acquis should be implemented.

• In order to encourage Greek Cyprus and also other members to take serious steps which would make contribution in favor of a settlement, the EU should give clear and positive signals to Turkey throughout the negotiation process. It would also help to eliminate any EU actor to politicize the issue over the Greek side.


International Strategic Research Organization (USAK)
Center for EU Studies
halil
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8804
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:21 pm
Location: nicosia

Postby kurupetos » Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:26 pm

The International Strategic Research Organization (ISRO) (Turkish: Uluslararası Stratejik Arastirmalar Kurumu (USAK)) is a controversial Turkish think tank.
The institution, its branches, and its publications are known to have a highly nationalistic stance,[citation needed] particularly in issues regarding the Armenian Question, which is claimed by Sedat Laçiner (who has a broad mandate over their functions[2]) as a field of expertise.

ISRO claimed that Armenian-American band System of a Down (SOAD) issued a video clip that degraded some historical Turkish notables and announced the incident as "Provocation of the Armenian band". The clip for the song Holy Mountains was edited by a SOAD fan and shared through Internet. ISRO argued, relying on a report by Turkish daily Akşam, that SOAD had the words "no Turks no dogs" were written on the tickets for a concert in their 1998 tour with Slayer. In a message on their blog Serj Tankian of SOAD stated that they canceled their shows opening for Slayer in 1998; any ticket were printed on Slayer's behalf; and that there were no anti-Turkish slurs on the tickets.



:lol:
User avatar
kurupetos
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18855
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 7:46 pm
Location: Cyprus

Postby halil » Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:32 pm

dedicated to kurupetos :lol: :lol: :lol:

Torture report puts police in the spotlight
By Rula Aweidah

THE COUNCIL of Europe has warned Cyprus it needs to do more to stamp out ill-treatment of detainees in police custody after a visit by a special committee on torture received many “complaints of ill-treatment” in police custody, some of which “was of such a severity that it could be considered as amounting to torture”.

The visit by the Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) took place in December 2004, and its report was approved by the Council of Europe in July 2005. It was released today, after the Cyprus government finally gave its green light for the findings to be published.

Publication of the report is always at the request of the country involved, and usually comes before the next review, scheduled every four years.

In its response to the report, dated April 2006, the government says many of the recommendations have been, or are in the process of being, adopted.

The report devoted much of its attention to conditions in police custody, saying the CPT delegation had received many complaints of ill-treatment

“The forms of ill-treatment alleged consisted in the main of slaps, kicks and punches to the head and body, including the genitals, with the detained person sometimes undressed and/or handcuffed. Allegations of ill-treatment also included the banging of heads on a desk, blows with batons or other objects and violence of a sexual nature.

“In a few cases, the ill-treatment alleged was of such a severity that it could be considered as amounting to torture.”

The report added: “The risk of ill-treatment appeared to be particularly high in respect of foreign nationals, the conditions under which many of them were being detained were entirely unacceptable and could, in some cases, be regarded as inhuman and degrading.”

The report highlighted the case of one foreign detainee, who claimed that during an interview at the Central Prison, he had been severely ill-treated. “The first alleged incident consisted of punches and kicks to the face, chest and abdomen. The detainee further alleged that, during the night, he had been made to undress and had, while in a standing position, been hooded and shackled by the wrists and ankles to bars in the police prison, whereupon police officers had hit him violently on various parts of the body, including his genitals.”

In its response, the government said the allegations had been investigated by the police and presented to court, both by the police, as well as by the testimony given by the detainee. “These allegations did not stand in Court; therefore, he was later sentenced to life imprisonment for conspiracy in a murder and car-arson.”

In general terms, the report urged the Justice Minister “to reiterate to all police officers the obligation to respect the Constitution, international human rights conventions and Cypriot law, impressing upon them that the ill-treatment of persons in their custody is an affront to the values which constitute the very foundations of the State, and will not be tolerated.”

The government replied that police were regularly reminded of their obligations and that police ethics were a key element of basic training, adding that a number of initiatives against discrimination had also been undertaken.

“Police attempts to limit citizen ill treatment,” it added, “are not limited to proactive measures, such as training, dissemination of information, circulars etc. All allegations of police ill-treatment are investigated and where appropriate the police take disciplinary measures against its members who seem to be involved in such violations.”

Pointing to a fall in the number of cases brought to the attention of police, the response added: “It is obvious that there is a reduction is cases involving human rights violations, and this can be attributed to the fact that police officers receive a more consistent training on protection of human rights, and of how to perform their duties in a humanitarian and professional manner.”

The situation was much better regarding conditions in the actual prison, with prisoners on the whole happy with their relations with the staff and enjoying “generous out-of-cell time”.

The main problem was the “rampant overcrowding” in the Nicosia Central Prison: “An overcrowded prison causes cramped and unhygienic accommodation, a constant lack of privacy, reduced out-of-cell activities, overburdened health-care services, and increased tension – and hence potentially more violence between prisoners and between prisoners and staff.”

In its response, the government said it was addressing the problem and that work would begin shortly to improve facilities, promising to fulfil the requirements concerning the size of cells and the living space per prisoner set out in the Prisons Regulations.

Moving to the Athalassa Psychiatric Hospital, The CPT’s delegation found no deliberate ill-treatment of patients, except for one particular patient who was considered potentially dangerous. At night he was kept in a special individual room with a metal, prison-like door. There was no toilet within the room and, as the patient was not allowed to leave his room during the night, he was obliged to use a slop bucket in order to comply with the needs of nature. A bed was later installed in the room after the CPT’s visit.

Treatment within the facility consisted mainly of psychotropic drug therapy. This therapy was used appropriately, the report said.

The CPT also recommended the development of an individualised therapeutic programme for each psychiatric patient, which involves appropriate medication and medical care, a wide range of rehabilitative and therapeutic activities.

The delegation found that establishments for children taken into care by the Social Welfare Services are running well without any means of ill treatment, and meet the needs of the children in a suitable manner, the report said.

The CPT is scheduled to return to Cyprus for a regular visit during the course of this year in order to review the situation.




Copyright © Cyprus Mail 2008
halil
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8804
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:21 pm
Location: nicosia

Postby kurupetos » Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:35 pm

I will let uncle Deniz answer to you on my behalf. 8) :lol:
User avatar
kurupetos
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18855
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 7:46 pm
Location: Cyprus

Postby boomerang » Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:38 pm

Uluslararası Stratejik Arastirmalar Kurumu ...another bayarak special

yawn :arrow: :lol: :arrow: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
boomerang
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7337
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 5:56 am

Postby zan » Tue Apr 15, 2008 5:19 pm

The depth of GC respect for any talks echoed in a Forum...Nice one guys!!! :roll: :roll:
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby Get Real! » Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:20 pm

kurupetos wrote:
The International Strategic Research Organization (ISRO) (Turkish: Uluslararası Stratejik Arastirmalar Kurumu (USAK)) is a controversial Turkish think tank.


:lol:


Well done Kurupetos... :wink:

(10 Brownie points from unkie GR for your good work)
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia


Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest