Get real..get real, of course if I do not agree with you I am talking rubbish. Explain please..there is no answer to the question admit it.
Or am I in for another tirade of abuse..
Get Real! wrote:When the Greek merchants first arrived on the island of Cyprus they DID NOT find a vacant land mass or they would not have had anyone to trade with!!!
It is high time that people ACKNOWLEDGE the presence of a people on the island of Cyprus who go back to 8,000BC.
These are the people who have FIRST CONTACT with Cyprus and NOT the Greeks or the Turks.
The ignorance and raping of the Cypriot inheritance must cease!
boomerang wrote:Theoretically speaking they arean't any Turkish Cypriots in Cyprus...Considering "turkey=fascist state" became a fascist country in the early 1900...
What we have here are Ottomans...So they should be refered to as the Ottoman Cypriots...
To be called a Turkish Cypriot, you must come from "turkey=fascist state" after 1920 and settled in Cyprus...
If the Ottomans claim they have been in Cyprus for over 400 years then how could they be known as Turkish Cypriots?
purdey wrote:No answer no proof, it can be argued until the end of time. Maybe they were from Turkey, hence Turkish Cypriots
Get Real! wrote:unitedwestand wrote:What a bunch of idiots. Who gives a shit about the past. The fact is we are here, call us Ottomans or Turks, we consider ourselves Cypriots. All that you are doing is cementing partition with such ridiculous debates.
You hate us and want a Cyprus without us. That will never happen as we have every right to be here. Deal with it. Bloody losers
An insecure response from a man awakening to the realities of the Cypriot identity...
Piratis wrote:Get Real! wrote:When the Greek merchants first arrived on the island of Cyprus they DID NOT find a vacant land mass or they would not have had anyone to trade with!!!
It is high time that people ACKNOWLEDGE the presence of a people on the island of Cyprus who go back to 8,000BC.
These are the people who have FIRST CONTACT with Cyprus and NOT the Greeks or the Turks.
The ignorance and raping of the Cypriot inheritance must cease!
Get Real, I didn't say Greeks were the very first. I said they were among the very first. When Greeks came to Cyprus the population of the whole island could not have been more than 5000 people and most of the island was uninhabited.
Secondly the Greek merchants traded via the sea. Their trade was done with various people, not just ones in Cyprus. In fact road routes from one city to another did not exist back then. Even until recently it was easier to go to Paphos from Limassol via the sea.
unitedwestand wrote:Get Real! wrote:unitedwestand wrote:What a bunch of idiots. Who gives a shit about the past. The fact is we are here, call us Ottomans or Turks, we consider ourselves Cypriots. All that you are doing is cementing partition with such ridiculous debates.
You hate us and want a Cyprus without us. That will never happen as we have every right to be here. Deal with it. Bloody losers
An insecure response from a man awakening to the realities of the Cypriot identity...
This is pointless. I am not having an identity crisis. I am Cypriot. It is you who is questioning my identity.
The Greeks were among the first inhabitants of Cyprus. Similar to the Greeks were the Phoenicians. They created their own new cities on uninhabited land and Cyprus was their home. They didn't come to Cyprus to exploit its people and transfer the profits abroad. The Greeks didn't come to Cyprus as "rulers".
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest