observer wrote:boomerang:[quote]I think you rushed your answer here...the 1960 constitution didn't really ammount to anything...As you can see in Oz we have a constitution as well but there no reason denying the fact that the indigenous people of Australia are in fact the aboriginals...
I'm just quoting your reply because otherwise the entry gets far too long.
I think that you would find a lot of people, TCs especially, who would say that your statement (shared by a number of GCs) that the 1960 Constitution didn't really amount to anything was a principle factor leading to the Cyprob today.
The reality is that very few GCs, if any, could trace their way back to a Greek ancestor who landed in Cyprus anytime BC. I'm not sure what an indigenous Cypriot is in ethnic terms, but given the successive waves of invaders and settlers before the era of ID cards and censuses, common sense would say that it is probably pretty mixed.[/quote]
In your first paragraph...you are right the Curpys problem did actually sowed the seeds for the problems....no arguing here...If it embraced all the people as Cypriots, today we wouldn't have a problem...
In your second paragraph...Not true...you thnk the aboriginals of OZ, are the indegenous people of Australia...they came from somewhere or you think they materialized out of thin air...never the less it does not discount the fact that theay are the indegenous people of the OZ...
You need to look up the word indegenous observer...