Main_Source wrote:I cant believe some of the people here think the British were innocent. You only have to ask other peoples of the British colonies for what they think the Empire did to their country.
I have, and in some cases they wish they'd never left because their countries became prey to dictators, corruption, infrastructural decay and inter-communal fighting. I also know quite a few older Cypriots who look back on the British days with a degree of fondness (yes, they do exist!)
Source, colonialism wasn't the best era, that's for sure, but if you compare British rule of its colonies to the asset-stripping activities that characterised the Belgian, Portuguese, and to some degree the French empires, you'll see that the British system of empire was in comparison reasonably benign. You should also remember that it is largely due to the British empire that the widespread practice of slavery was ended (which had been present in Africa for centuries before the Europeans arrived and made it an international trade), with the abolition of slavery act in 1832 (I think). This made slavery illegal throughout the empire and pre-dated the famous American emancipation proclamation by three decades. So not everything that happened during the empire was evil.
The cases of Pakistan and Israel that you cite were not products of British divide-and-rule, they were cases of states with artificial borders, probably the worst legacy we have from the race for colonies. If you cite the case of Pakistan, you have to account for the later division of Pakistan in the early 1970s, when Bangladesh split from the country.
Also, there are calls from a number of smaller African countries, most prominently Sierra Leone, for what would effectively be neo-colonialism. These people are desperate to re-establish order in their countries and hanker back to the colonial period as the only time when this existed.
No-one wants to go back to this, but to decry the days of empire as wholly decrepid is wrong. Cyprus did see a marked change from its domination by the Ottomans and it's British rule that offered Cypriots the freedoms to develop their national identities. With hindsight, maybe it would have been better if they hadn't.