DT. wrote:denizaksulu wrote:DT. wrote:denizaksulu wrote:DT. wrote:xxNilxx wrote:Why are you getting Mustafa Kemal Ataturk involved in this?? We never get Makarios involved in anything.
it is not true at all and thus very far from funny....<< quote
are you seriously?? this is not true? most of those posts is true unfortunetly
WHats not true about him being a drunk paedophile?
Even if true, a supposedly cultured and civilised person as I assumed you are should know better. Another disappointment. We all know his love for Raki, whats the big deal. Anyone seen him drunk. So what, your gripe is you have a sore memory.
Beware
The next topic might be a cloaked papas.
Thats funny Deniz....after 12 pages of posts about taking the piss out of GC's you decide to get sensitive on page 12 when ataturk is mentioned.
I am dissapointed mate, not you.
I mightneedle some people for their comments, but taking the piss out of leaders, I have not done (on this forum) yet. If need be, there is plenty smut around.
whats so special about leaders? Are they worth more to you than taking the piss out of someone personally?
I disagree with the logic there.
Far from defending Mustafa Kemal (his achievement talk for themselves), I am one of those who is angry at him at allowing Cyprus to be ceded to the British in 1923, Lausanne. No, he was not perfect. No man is perfect.