CopperLine wrote:First, there is a basic conflict of interests.
CopperLine wrote:Piratis,
If, as it appears, you are a moderator on this forum, your latest posts on this thread were, I regret to say, a sheer disgrace.
First, there is a basic conflict of interests. On the one hand you are in a position to delete or block posts and on the other hand you are a frequent poster.
Second, your posts on this thread betray a basic inability to distinguish the moral, legal and political difference between an action and a thought. How on earth can you seriously equate an act of killing, say, with the thought of killing !
Third, you make an outrageous slur - tantamount to a libel - on people by saying that because some persons of group X were murdered by some persons of group Y then any and all individuals of group Y are murderers or accomplices in crime. This is manifestly absurd. Without a doubt there are Greek Cypriots who have killed Turkish Cypriots, but I cannot possibly therefore conclude that all Greek Cypriots are TC killers. (But notice that Oracle's argument is exactly this, but its mirror image. How many times has she posted that Turks are inherently aggressive, expansionist, liars, cheats, killers, murderers, ethnic cleansers, etc ? And yet you conclude that it is OK for her to pollute this forum with such racist and offensive ideas.
(You say that you are motivated by a desire to uphold human rights, right ? Well how about starting with the human right to be judged for individual actions, not to be subjected to collective judgements and punishments, to be allowed access to and shown evidence of alleged crimes, and for a fair hearing. In what you are doing here you are acting as investigator, prosecutor, judge and jury; you are charging people with offences that they did not actually commit; and then you are refusing the accused from speaking in their own defence, and the damning them if they have the temerity to criticise).
And yet, fourth, when someone repeatedly makes such a manifestly racist argument you turn a blind eye as moderator and punish those who seek to point out both the stupidity and offensiveness of such postings.
unitedwestand wrote:I have never seen any GC member commenting on the TCs legitemately owning any portion of the island. Are we illegal immigrants, do we not belong on the island at all? Should we be kicked out of Cyprus? If we all volunteered to leave would it make the GCs the happiest people on the planet? Would it make Oracle really happy?
The sooner you all look at the logs in your own eyes and stop picking on me, the better for all of us including the forum.
Contrary to popular belief I do not look for attention (I prefer solitude) ..... this like much else, has been thrust upon me because Big Al could not cope with my arguments this morning.
Whenever a Turk-TC or other fails to win an argument, they indeed are the ones, observer, to throw the tantrums and start threads such as this or the hurling of obscenities. They are the ones showing their knickers for attention because they fail in the discussions ....
I started a thread a while back to ask why the Cyprus problem is exclusively male ....
Well this is the reason why.
Any women participating in the Cyprus problem are hounded and picked on like this until they pack up and leave ....
Well get used to it I am here to stay for as long as I choose ... and because I stay ... you lot get angrier and angrier because you cannot face making up any more lies to counter the reasons why you occupy half my country.[/color]
You or any other misguided Turk is not going to ridicule me off the forum with your disgusting mouths ...[color=red]I will ridicule you out of my country first
CopperLine wrote:Piratis,
If, as it appears, you are a moderator on this forum, your latest posts on this thread were, I regret to say, a sheer disgrace.
First, there is a basic conflict of interests. On the one hand you are in a position to delete or block posts and on the other hand you are a frequent poster.
Second, your posts on this thread betray a basic inability to distinguish the moral, legal and political difference between an action and a thought. How on earth can you seriously equate an act of killing, say, with the thought of killing !
Third, you make an outrageous slur - tantamount to a libel - on people by saying that because some persons of group X were murdered by some persons of group Y then any and all individuals of group Y are murderers or accomplices in crime. This is manifestly absurd. Without a doubt there are Greek Cypriots who have killed Turkish Cypriots, but I cannot possibly therefore conclude that all Greek Cypriots are TC killers. (But notice that Oracle's argument is exactly this, but its mirror image. How many times has she posted that Turks are inherently aggressive, expansionist, liars, cheats, killers, murderers, ethnic cleansers, etc ? And yet you conclude that it is OK for her to pollute this forum with such racist and offensive ideas.
(You say that you are motivated by a desire to uphold human rights, right ? Well how about starting with the human right to be judged for individual actions, not to be subjected to collective judgements and punishments, to be allowed access to and shown evidence of alleged crimes, and for a fair hearing. In what you are doing here you are acting as investigator, prosecutor, judge and jury; you are charging people with offences that they did not actually commit; and then you are refusing the accused from speaking in their own defence, and the damning them if they have the temerity to criticise).
And yet, fourth, when someone repeatedly makes such a manifestly racist argument you turn a blind eye as moderator and punish those who seek to point out both the stupidity and offensiveness of such postings.
Get Real! wrote:Expatkiwi wrote:Get Real! wrote:That’s a lie! I often stress that 12.3% of land was purchased (owned) by Turkish Cypriots.
I know you hotly dispute that 31% TC ownership figure I (hastilly) quoted on Wikipedia, but I thought you had stated that the 'true' T/C land ownership figure was at 18%, so what happened to the other 5.7%?
Incidentally, I read a book on the Cyprus problem, and one of the offers that had been made by the GC leadership (and rejected) was for a federal solution with the Turkish Cypriot component at 25%. Considering that the 12.3% figure of yours is the 'correct' standard, is the GC's really that generous to double that figure in a settlement proposal?
As you already know the 18% often mentioned is based on the population to land ratio but technically if we go by actual title deeds then one can argue that the TC community should be entitled to a proportional percentage of the 26.3% State/Church land in which case using cross-multiplication would yield..
(26.3 x 12.3) / 100 = 3.2349 + 12.3 = 15.54%
CopperLine wrote:Piratis,
If, as it appears, you are a moderator on this forum, your latest posts on this thread were, I regret to say, a sheer disgrace.
First, there is a basic conflict of interests. On the one hand you are in a position to delete or block posts and on the other hand you are a frequent poster.
Second, your posts on this thread betray a basic inability to distinguish the moral, legal and political difference between an action and a thought. How on earth can you seriously equate an act of killing, say, with the thought of killing !
Third, you make an outrageous slur - tantamount to a libel - on people by saying that because some persons of group X were murdered by some persons of group Y then any and all individuals of group Y are murderers or accomplices in crime. This is manifestly absurd. Without a doubt there are Greek Cypriots who have killed Turkish Cypriots, but I cannot possibly therefore conclude that all Greek Cypriots are TC killers. (But notice that Oracle's argument is exactly this, but its mirror image. How many times has she posted that Turks are inherently aggressive, expansionist, liars, cheats, killers, murderers, ethnic cleansers, etc ? And yet you conclude that it is OK for her to pollute this forum with such racist and offensive ideas.
(You say that you are motivated by a desire to uphold human rights, right ? Well how about starting with the human right to be judged for individual actions, not to be subjected to collective judgements and punishments, to be allowed access to and shown evidence of alleged crimes, and for a fair hearing. In what you are doing here you are acting as investigator, prosecutor, judge and jury; you are charging people with offences that they did not actually commit; and then you are refusing the accused from speaking in their own defence, and the damning them if they have the temerity to criticise).
And yet, fourth, when someone repeatedly makes such a manifestly racist argument you turn a blind eye as moderator and punish those who seek to point out both the stupidity and offensiveness of such postings.
Oracle wrote:CopperLine wrote:Piratis,
If, as it appears, you are a moderator on this forum, your latest posts on this thread were, I regret to say, a sheer disgrace.
First, there is a basic conflict of interests. On the one hand you are in a position to delete or block posts and on the other hand you are a frequent poster.
Second, your posts on this thread betray a basic inability to distinguish the moral, legal and political difference between an action and a thought. How on earth can you seriously equate an act of killing, say, with the thought of killing !
Third, you make an outrageous slur - tantamount to a libel - on people by saying that because some persons of group X were murdered by some persons of group Y then any and all individuals of group Y are murderers or accomplices in crime. This is manifestly absurd. Without a doubt there are Greek Cypriots who have killed Turkish Cypriots, but I cannot possibly therefore conclude that all Greek Cypriots are TC killers. (But notice that Oracle's argument is exactly this, but its mirror image. How many times has she posted that Turks are inherently aggressive, expansionist, liars, cheats, killers, murderers, ethnic cleansers, etc ? And yet you conclude that it is OK for her to pollute this forum with such racist and offensive ideas.
(You say that you are motivated by a desire to uphold human rights, right ? Well how about starting with the human right to be judged for individual actions, not to be subjected to collective judgements and punishments, to be allowed access to and shown evidence of alleged crimes, and for a fair hearing. In what you are doing here you are acting as investigator, prosecutor, judge and jury; you are charging people with offences that they did not actually commit; and then you are refusing the accused from speaking in their own defence, and the damning them if they have the temerity to criticise).
And yet, fourth, when someone repeatedly makes such a manifestly racist argument you turn a blind eye as moderator and punish those who seek to point out both the stupidity and offensiveness of such postings.
It is unfortunate you chose not to see, how you choose to ignore, the posts of Viewpoint, Zan, Shahmaran, Big Al, Eric dayi, Epatkiwi, and countless others but only pick on Oracle. Which you have exclusively, persistently, selectively isolated.
How fair is that?
And by choosing to ignore their "racist" comments you have condemned yourself to condoning anti-Greek /GC "racism".
Henceforth you are a self-outed "racist".
What is the rational behind your bias?
For biased you undeniably are ... not just now, but in nearly every post I have read of yours.
What's more you do not add to the sum of knowledge, but prefer to criticise posters ... correction just one or two "select" posters from one end of the "spectrum".
"Racist" CopperLine in denial
You assume superiority above posters, moderators and Adminisrators and deem yourself as the only one non-partisan, and without prior participation in the discussion, to present a verdict.
Well CopperLine it is obvious to me from your posts, that you love the Turks and hate the Greeks .... Am I wrong?
(... and we shan't even mention the complex case of TCs and GCs).
zan wrote:Oracle wrote:CopperLine wrote:Piratis,
If, as it appears, you are a moderator on this forum, your latest posts on this thread were, I regret to say, a sheer disgrace.
First, there is a basic conflict of interests. On the one hand you are in a position to delete or block posts and on the other hand you are a frequent poster.
Second, your posts on this thread betray a basic inability to distinguish the moral, legal and political difference between an action and a thought. How on earth can you seriously equate an act of killing, say, with the thought of killing !
Third, you make an outrageous slur - tantamount to a libel - on people by saying that because some persons of group X were murdered by some persons of group Y then any and all individuals of group Y are murderers or accomplices in crime. This is manifestly absurd. Without a doubt there are Greek Cypriots who have killed Turkish Cypriots, but I cannot possibly therefore conclude that all Greek Cypriots are TC killers. (But notice that Oracle's argument is exactly this, but its mirror image. How many times has she posted that Turks are inherently aggressive, expansionist, liars, cheats, killers, murderers, ethnic cleansers, etc ? And yet you conclude that it is OK for her to pollute this forum with such racist and offensive ideas.
(You say that you are motivated by a desire to uphold human rights, right ? Well how about starting with the human right to be judged for individual actions, not to be subjected to collective judgements and punishments, to be allowed access to and shown evidence of alleged crimes, and for a fair hearing. In what you are doing here you are acting as investigator, prosecutor, judge and jury; you are charging people with offences that they did not actually commit; and then you are refusing the accused from speaking in their own defence, and the damning them if they have the temerity to criticise).
And yet, fourth, when someone repeatedly makes such a manifestly racist argument you turn a blind eye as moderator and punish those who seek to point out both the stupidity and offensiveness of such postings.
It is unfortunate you chose not to see, how you choose to ignore, the posts of Viewpoint, Zan, Shahmaran, Big Al, Eric dayi, Epatkiwi, and countless others but only pick on Oracle. Which you have exclusively, persistently, selectively isolated.
How fair is that?
And by choosing to ignore their "racist" comments you have condemned yourself to condoning anti-Greek /GC "racism".
Henceforth you are a self-outed "racist".
What is the rational behind your bias?
For biased you undeniably are ... not just now, but in nearly every post I have read of yours.
What's more you do not add to the sum of knowledge, but prefer to criticise posters ... correction just one or two "select" posters from one end of the "spectrum".
"Racist" CopperLine in denial
You assume superiority above posters, moderators and Adminisrators and deem yourself as the only one non-partisan, and without prior participation in the discussion, to present a verdict.
Well CopperLine it is obvious to me from your posts, that you love the Turks and hate the Greeks .... Am I wrong?
(... and we shan't even mention the complex case of TCs and GCs).
They are aimed at you and the GC leaders you silly cow How many more times do I have tto say that...Not only a racist but a lier too
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest