by Nurgary » Tue Apr 01, 2008 7:15 pm
-mikkie2- wrote:"Fair one I will call a Turk a Turk and a Macedonian a Macedonian."
As long as a Turk is genuinely a Turk and a Macedonian is a Macedonian Greek. FYROM 'macedonians' are simply Slavs or Albanians!
by Oracle » Tue Apr 01, 2008 7:38 pm
Nurgary wrote:-mikkie2- wrote:"Fair one I will call a Turk a Turk and a Macedonian a Macedonian."
As long as a Turk is genuinely a Turk and a Macedonian is a Macedonian Greek. FYROM 'macedonians' are simply Slavs or Albanians!
Why do the 5 perm members of UN SC accept Republic of Macedonian and their people as Macedioniens?
by -mikkie2- » Wed Apr 02, 2008 11:07 am
by pappy_sydney » Sat Apr 05, 2008 7:38 pm
by boomerang » Sun Apr 06, 2008 1:03 am
-mikkie2- wrote:Nurgary
I have explained the historical background to Macedonia and what are Macedonians.
The people of FYROM have no historical link with ancient Macedonia other than a geographical one. They are Slavs and Albanians, and they do not have bloodlines to ancient Macedonians. This is a generally accepted view and it is backed up by a wealth of historical and archeological evidence.
As I said before, if anything it is Greece that should be laying claim to FYROM and not the other way around! But obviously we live in a civilised world and Greece has no territorial ambitions on FYROM. All it wants is for FYROM to acknowledge that its people do not have the right to use Macedonian history as its own. Any country would do the same if its history was being hijacked by another.
...a dick in da box...his only problem he doesn't know which colour... 
by zan » Sun Apr 06, 2008 3:11 am
boomerang wrote:-mikkie2- wrote:Nurgary
I have explained the historical background to Macedonia and what are Macedonians.
The people of FYROM have no historical link with ancient Macedonia other than a geographical one. They are Slavs and Albanians, and they do not have bloodlines to ancient Macedonians. This is a generally accepted view and it is backed up by a wealth of historical and archeological evidence.
As I said before, if anything it is Greece that should be laying claim to FYROM and not the other way around! But obviously we live in a civilised world and Greece has no territorial ambitions on FYROM. All it wants is for FYROM to acknowledge that its people do not have the right to use Macedonian history as its own. Any country would do the same if its history was being hijacked by another.
Don't worry about nurgary...he is out buying his wife a present
by boomerang » Sun Apr 06, 2008 4:30 am
zan wrote:boomerang wrote:-mikkie2- wrote:Nurgary
I have explained the historical background to Macedonia and what are Macedonians.
The people of FYROM have no historical link with ancient Macedonia other than a geographical one. They are Slavs and Albanians, and they do not have bloodlines to ancient Macedonians. This is a generally accepted view and it is backed up by a wealth of historical and archeological evidence.
As I said before, if anything it is Greece that should be laying claim to FYROM and not the other way around! But obviously we live in a civilised world and Greece has no territorial ambitions on FYROM. All it wants is for FYROM to acknowledge that its people do not have the right to use Macedonian history as its own. Any country would do the same if its history was being hijacked by another.
Don't worry about nurgary...he is out buying his wife a present
You wait all day long for a dick in da box and along come two at once!!!
...Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
