Get Real! wrote:Nurgary wrote:Get Real! wrote:Nurgary wrote:I see you like the veto in the EU but not when it comes to Cyprus - very interesting. Want majority rule at home but minority equality within EU.
So what about an equal partnership in Cyprus.
Hello? We paid for that veto with our membership fee/s because it was part of the benefits to joining this club!
What's that word again? CLUB!
Membership now is it - TC's had membership with veto until you tw*ts forced them out.
As I said majority rule at home and minority equality elsewhere.
If you’re too daft to understand, or don’t want to understand, then that’s YOUR problem but quit wasting my time thank you!
BC Numismatics wrote:The E.U. cannot be a guarantor,as it isn't a country.
CopperLine wrote:BC Numismatics,
That's your opinion, but that wasn't the issue. The issue that you raised was whether the EU could or could not be a guarantor power, and you concluded that it could not because it was not a 'country'. I simply pointed out the mistakes.
On your other claim, are you really arguing that UK didn't intervene in Cyprus because it was too busy in Northern Ireland ? (As I recall it was busy fitting up a bunch of innocent Irishmen for the Birmingham pub bombings for which they were entirely innocent).
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests