Cyprus-Forum.com

[Nurgary]

I see you like the veto in the EU but not when it comes to Cyprus - very interesting. Want majority rule at home but minority equality within EU.

So what about an equal partnership in Cyprus.

[shahmaran]

[Get Real!]

I see you like the veto in the EU but not when it comes to Cyprus - very interesting. Want majority rule at home but minority equality within EU.

So what about an equal partnership in Cyprus.

Hello? We paid for that veto with our membership fee/s because it was part of the benefits to joining this club!

What's that word again? CLUB!

[Oracle]

The term "invaded" is a matter of perception my friend, i think that is the REAL problem most GC's purposely choose to ignore.

If you accept that "invaded" can be a matter of perception, then you accept that for those who perceived it as an invasion ... it truly was an invasion .... end of!

[shahmaran]

Sure, like i said you purposely miss certain points, just like you have purposely ignored the end of my post.

Once you take it out of its original context then you can attach to it whatever meaning you like and wished was true

[Nurgary]

I see you like the veto in the EU but not when it comes to Cyprus - very interesting. Want majority rule at home but minority equality within EU.

So what about an equal partnership in Cyprus.

Hello? We paid for that veto with our membership fee/s because it was part of the benefits to joining this club!

What's that word again? CLUB!

Membership now is it - TC's had membership with veto until you tw*ts forced them out.

As I said majority rule at home and minority equality elsewhere.

[cypezokyli]

Presidential Spokesman Hasan Ercakica has said that the issue of guarantorship can not be a bargaining issue.

Stating that it was possible for the Greek Cypriot Side to bring up the issue at the negotiating table, Mr Ercakica said that the Turkish Cypriot Side’s attitude on the issue was quite clear.
Speaking at his weekly press briefing, the Presidential Spokesman Hasan Ercakica warned that attempts to bring the issue of guarantorship as a bargaining issue could lead to serious disagreement in the negotiations process.

The Presidential Spokesman reminded that the guarantorship treaties, which had an international status, were still in effect.

Responding to claims that the 8-July agreement was put into practice following the meeting between the two leaders on the 21st of March, the spokesman said that 8 July agreement had passed and that a new process had begun on the 21st of March.

Underlining the need to more forward by focusing on issues agreed upon by the two leaders, Mr Ercakica said that such excessive comments and statements on the 8-July agreement will do nothing but harm the new process.

Also touching upon the opening of a crossing at Lokmaci, Ercakica said that the crossing will be opened as soon as possible.

He said that officials from the United Nations and the Cyprus Turkish Security Forces will be coming together for a coordination meeting regarding the issue of sweeping and clearing mines in the area.

first: everything is negotiable. there is even a committee to be formed on security and guarantees

second: why are people wasting their time in what the Ercakica said ?
he is just trying to calm down his own nationalists.



whats the point of opening such topics, honestly....
the news of the day is that committees will start working soon

[BC Numismatics]

The E.U. cannot be a guarantor,as it isn't a country.

As for Great Britain not intervening in 1974,it had its own war to fight - against the subhumans of Sinn Fein/I.R.A.,who have been holding the people of Ulster to ransom since 1922,& being aided & abetted by the terrorist regime in the Romish rebel pirate state that is located south of Ulster (Republic of Ireland).

Aidan.

[Get Real!]

I see you like the veto in the EU but not when it comes to Cyprus - very interesting. Want majority rule at home but minority equality within EU.

So what about an equal partnership in Cyprus.

Hello? We paid for that veto with our membership fee/s because it was part of the benefits to joining this club!

What's that word again? CLUB!

Membership now is it - TC's had membership with veto until you tw*ts forced them out.

As I said majority rule at home and minority equality elsewhere.

If you’re too daft to understand, or don’t want to understand, then that’s YOUR problem but quit wasting my time thank you!

[Oracle]

Sure, like i said you purposely miss certain points, just like you have purposely ignored the end of my post.

Once you take it out of its original context then you can attach to it whatever meaning you like and wished was true

Please note ... you are absurd .... I quoted your whole phrase ... nothing out of place except for the missing bit that would have given it some sense in the first place ...