bill cobbett wrote:repulsewarrior wrote:...here is my problem OP. It's obvious I care. It's obvious to me that you love this island as much as i do.
and yet, my question to date remains ignored. I would like to write to Talat and to Christofias personally.
Can you help me?
Mr. B, you must have read my last postings on this thread, what do you think?
Who was saying stay calm, and let's stick together, thank-you, but (as you know) we need more, I need more.
Only Nikitas is on subject, in my mind now he is Mr.N.
and bill, one of my favorite posters, my friend,
don't be bamboozled into thinking BBF is all bad, in it like in all things is a yin and a yang.
i could use your consideration.
RW. Let me say first that, I do passionately share your belief that all Cs can live together in peace.
On the political level I am very unhappy with artificial but very real internal borders. Whether this is a bizonal or some kind of canton (or enclave, don't like this word) based agreement maintains the present segregation, keeps up the them and us mentality and with limited personal contact between communities. Then we have another artificial construction in the matter of the Constitution and the relationship between the zonal governing bodies and the role and strength of the central government. We are in danger (again) of building a house of cards.
On the personal level, these BCF agreements will mean, it seems to me that, we will be telling a good many Cypriots (of both communities) that they will have to give up their rights to their homes, lands and their village roots for some greater good. Now, some will say that there will be compensation but in the first instance all homes and land must be returned to rightful owners. It is up to them to decide whether or not to accept compensation.
The EU angle. Any agreement has to comply with Cy's obligations to the other EU states and respect EU laws. I am of the view that BCFs/Cantonal schemes don't comply because they are more than likely to impose restraints on such matters as freedom of movement and freedom to enjoy property.
My preference in 2008 - Build on a EU model base with no internal borders. Only guarantees the EU and its laws and institutions.
My compromise in 2008 - A temporary BCF agreement (5-10 years) pending my permanent preference above.
(Bugger - RW has made me compromise)
My bottom line (red line I think some call it) - Army of RoT must go on Day 0 - no negotiation.
indeed i agree with you. The State must be strong and Sovereign as our representative, as Cypriots.
Consider carefully my proposal, because the two National Assemblies will have a Jurisdiction,(not its Sovereignty) by territory, to provide services over the whole island. Nothing will prevent the majority to serve themselves, but as Turkish Cypriots, or Greek Cypriots, they will have to demonstrate their committment to inclusiveness as Persons, which a State cannot do for them, defending its Citizens as Individuals, and/or their Basic Human Rights. There will be no exclusivity in either region (zone), anywhere, (while the repopulation may be managed), and in terms of voting rights, no citizen in any election is identified by ethnicity, but only by where they reside, and all citizens regardless of their origins have an equal vote, where all votes are counted equally.
...imagine Jerusalem, and the Proposal I have made.
In terms of this bicommunality (and now this bizonality) the world has all over it, our experiment is important, if we have the courage to choose our Freedom based on the Highest Human Principals, the cost will naturally be high.
An agreement like the Annan Plan, on the other hand, cost relatively little, but it is worth far less as well, having the same errors as the Zurich Treaty: about land and the Rule over it, being unclear, depending on the Goodwill of 'others', not being this island's dwellers.
you are principaled, i may be more practical i suppose, and i like to think i know having grown old in a cosmopolitain city that diversity adds to living, and that tolerance, and a Rule of Law is a way to embracing our fear of the unknown, when we are all seeking our own distinction. and in this vain i have to say, the State is supreme by Right in the citizens' representation, but in my proposal the taxpayer is closest to his/her money.
i say there are the things that must be done with no compromise as well. Although there is nothing to stop us from demonstrating this principal in different ways at different levels for ourselves. We can do as we please...this is the dumbfounding thing of our Problem; there is nothing wrong seeking Perfection, first of all to find it and then to choose.
the maps of april and may
circles on the page
by Denktash and Makarios
forgotten as Ecevit's idea
i saw its potential and it
has given me hope ever since.
nothing should be more important than the satisfaction of the displaced first; meaning all of them: originally, in the 60's, and which followed in '74, equally, compassionately, and in the same way.
humanitarian aid can be provided to settlers who do not meet the criteria for homes by Turkish Cypriots, and as Cypriots. (Humanitarian aid to all that will be displaced in any settlement i think is an important issue as well.) futuristically we have to think of what has as the greatest potential the one choice for the island's wealth;
the island should have no military, to divide people.
and in that bill (and OP) you are well within your rights, to feel so strongly, in that we surely agree. in any settlement about the geography however, defining it politically, there will be no Unitary State without a Governance that reflects the people's needs and their desires to identify themselves as persons. within the context of two zones for two societies to grow their own distinction what is wrong with enclaves spotting the island reapportioning the land in a manner which is for the full potential of this island's growth, as well as a demonstration of our commitment to the Principals Humans call Justice.
i'm too tired to edit this and i hope some parts make senxse.
goodnight