Oracle wrote:Is anybody else experiencing technical difficulties with this thread?
shahmaran wrote:Bill, is it true that Sampson never really got sentenced?
shahmaran wrote:He served 4 years! 4!!
I think it is fair to say that each one should sort out their side first before launching cheap attacks, but then thats what Boomers is all about so i cant blame the poor old man.
shahmaran wrote:He served 4 years! 4!!
I think it is fair to say that each one should sort out their side first before launching cheap attacks, but then thats what Boomers is all about so i cant blame the poor old man.
boomerang wrote:shahmaran wrote:He served 4 years! 4!!
I think it is fair to say that each one should sort out their side first before launching cheap attacks, but then thats what Boomers is all about so i cant blame the poor old man.
FFS sake shit for brains...I posted an article, left no comment, and in your view it warranted the yadda yadda...very intelligent of you...another deviasion from the point...
Instead of shooting down the messenger, why not try and adrees the question as to why the banks aren't accepting the deeds...
...coz sorting "shit" out has nothing to do with the price of fish in this thread...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest