The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Why a united is impossible & not desirable

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby Oracle » Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:05 pm

GreekForumer wrote: .... handed the Syrian coastal city of Alexandretta to the Turks in 1939 – sending survivors of the 1915 Armenian genocide into exile for a second time – in the hope that Turkey ....


Why break with tradition? ... The Turks have perfected the "Repetitious Invasion Practice" .... How many times have they invaded Cyprus ... at least twice within a month in 1974 .... :roll:
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby Nikitas » Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:26 pm

Big Al,

If they cannot live together, how come they were spread all over the island and neither community felt the need to lock itself away from the other until 1957 when the TMT began that idiotic policy of Greeks out?

If you cannot live on the island then move. Go find a monoethnic, monocultural place where you can be at ease with your fellow ethnic purists.
Nikitas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7420
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:49 pm

Postby repulsewarrior » Mon Mar 17, 2008 6:36 pm

there is one God for those who believe. both societies as Humans seek for the betterment of their condition, and in that all People anywhere are the same, with the exception of the fanatics, despots, and dictators who rule to suit their own needs. the world has become a very small place and we must demonstrate our commitment to be inclusive if we are to survive.

the principal of Bicommunality allows us the rights we have as Individuals to stand united on Principals which are universal, while as Persons it allows us the right to stand together even if we are apart.

the partition will add to instability by making permanent the adversarial component of this impasse, the Cyprus Problem has become. it leaves the future unclear, and it invites more violence in the future. it does nothing to end the thinking which is anathema to our exsistence as compassionate beings.

Big Al, I believe we will live as Cypriots having this identity to represent ourselves as members of a larger family called Man. We have the luxury to decide for ourselves how we shape our daily lives, and it is hoped that as a Turcophone or a Grecophone that we can have with a Bizonal structure the opportunity to sustain ourselves in this regard by the respect as a majority we can afford to others while we seek to sustain ourselves.

"You" cannot have what you want, and neither can the "Greeks". I suggest to you that what is right is right, and that is what we should be seeking. In that regard, i am still waiting for you to post a more appropriate comment in my thread, "A Just Proposal".
User avatar
repulsewarrior
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 14261
Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 2:13 am
Location: homeless in Canada

Postby Expatkiwi » Mon Mar 17, 2008 7:34 pm

Kifeas wrote:The main difference is that while the GCs have a vision for a holistic, sovereign and independent Cyprus...


If that was the case, then the intercommunial conflict would never have started. The GC's at that time wanted Cyprus to be part of the Hellenic Republic (which translated out to 'Turks not Welcome'). Why should the T/C's think that that attitude has changed?
User avatar
Expatkiwi
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1454
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: Texas, USA

Postby bill cobbett » Mon Mar 17, 2008 8:13 pm

Expatkiwi wrote:
Kifeas wrote:The main difference is that while the GCs have a vision for a holistic, sovereign and independent Cyprus...


If that was the case, then the intercommunial conflict would never have started. The GC's at that time wanted Cyprus to be part of the Hellenic Republic (which translated out to 'Turks not Welcome'). Why should the T/C's think that that attitude has changed?


If I may say so, the answer to your question is staring you in the face Xpat mate. Look at the past posts on this matter in this Forum. Your very general statement that "gcs (gosh how I despise that phrase) wanted Cy to be part of ...etc. ain't right in my very humble estimation.

I for one and I know I am not alone have never wanted anything to do with union with Gr. (yuk!)
User avatar
bill cobbett
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 15759
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Embargoed from Kyrenia by Jurkish Army and Genocided (many times) by Thieving, Brain-Washed Lordo

Postby Oracle » Mon Mar 17, 2008 8:34 pm

bill cobbett wrote:
Expatkiwi wrote:
Kifeas wrote:The main difference is that while the GCs have a vision for a holistic, sovereign and independent Cyprus...


If that was the case, then the intercommunial conflict would never have started. The GC's at that time wanted Cyprus to be part of the Hellenic Republic (which translated out to 'Turks not Welcome'). Why should the T/C's think that that attitude has changed?


If I may say so, the answer to your question is staring you in the face Xpat mate. Look at the past posts on this matter in this Forum. Your very general statement that "gcs (gosh how I despise that phrase) wanted Cy to be part of ...etc. ain't right in my very humble estimation.

I for one and I know I am not alone have never wanted anything to do with union with Gr. (yuk!)


I'm with you bill ... I have never desired Cyprus to have Enosis with Greece, and I happen to be half Greek. My mother is 100% Greek and she has despised Enosis ... even through the '50s.

Expatkiwi is characteristically distorting the truth again and I am sure Kifeas will set him on the right path to truth.

Expatkiwi wrote: Why should the T/C's think that that attitude has changed?


As two independent countries in the EU with all the benefits that entails ... why should Cyprus have Enosis with Greece and lose all those (veto etc.)!
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby Expatkiwi » Mon Mar 17, 2008 9:01 pm

You people are missing the point: thanks to what has happened, suspicion has resulted and - Human nature beibng what it is - is going to prevail. If what you say is true in that only a tiny minority of G/C's wanted enosis, then they are the ones to blame for all that has transpired. Also Makarios in his initial statements (I'm talking about the early 1960's) as the first President of Cyprus...
User avatar
Expatkiwi
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1454
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 11:24 pm
Location: Texas, USA

Postby bill cobbett » Mon Mar 17, 2008 9:24 pm

I dunno Expat, why does it so often come back to the late President?

My personal thoughts are that the late Blessed, Saint M. (may god have mercy on his soul) a bit of an enigma. Common sense tells me that an G. Orthodox priest trained in mainland Gr (as far as I am aware) would be sympathetic to much closer ties with Gr., but the honest impression I had of the man's public utterances (certainly post 1967 and the colonel's coup in Gr) was that union was undesirable given the presence of the other community that he would have felt he also represented not to mention the presence of the RoT army 40 miles away.

So an enigma - greek priest or politician? I think he was a politician first and foremost and one who was treading on eggshells a lot of the time. But I suspect others would disagree.
User avatar
bill cobbett
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 15759
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Embargoed from Kyrenia by Jurkish Army and Genocided (many times) by Thieving, Brain-Washed Lordo

Re: Why a united is impossible & not desirable

Postby Kikapu » Mon Mar 17, 2008 9:33 pm

Big Al wrote:firstly lets look at some undeniable facts...
1. for a united cyprus to exist peacefully you need to have both communities gel and become one community.
2. a community is able to successfully function when there is a shared culture amongst its people.
3. the components of a culture are language, beliefs & values and symbols.

Lets know define the components of culture:
* Language is self explanatory
* beliefs: statements held to be true
* values: differentiates right feelings, thoughts and behavior from wrong feelings, thoughts and behavior
* symbols: anything that carries a particular meaning to a group.

Lets now see how compatible to TC and GC cultures are, as everyone agrees that to have a functioning community you must have a shared culture.
* Language, lets see, Turkish and Greek (with a funny accent), some shared words but the language dont sound the same, look the same, nor do they have similar origins. Unless your bilingual a TC cant understand a GC and vice a versa.
* Beliefs, poles apart here, one believes jesus was the son of god the other believes god cannot have a son. one believes Mohammed was gods last prophet the other definitely does not. Quran/Bible two very different beliefs.
* Values: the feelings/thoughts of TC again completely different to that of GC. should cyprus be united/divided? should TC have self or not? should Turkey remove its soldiers from northern cyprus? Should people that have migrated from Turkey be forced back? etc etc ..30 plus years of a divided cyprus has shown what TC believe to be right and true is not what GC believe to be right and true.
* The crescent moon and star, the red of the turkish flag, mosques, symbols that mean something to TC. To GC the orthodox cross, their churches etc again to similarities.

My point here is how the hell can a united community function when the cultures are so different. Wake up people partition is the ONLY SOLUTION.


I think Big Al who thinks people of different ethnicity cannot live together, must have overlooked what has /is happening in Turkey. Perhaps he thinks that Turkey was/is a mono cultural state...........perhaps by force and threat and intimidation, but below the surface, true ethnic communities know who they really are.

Below was an article in the paper which seems to touch on what Big Al thinks he is talking about. Perhaps Cyprus should have taken few lessons from Turkey on how to keep all ethnicity in line so that they are only known as Cypriots. Perhaps the British are at fault there, from letting it happen.


Image

Image
The photographer Attila Durak in Istanbul. His book documents 44 different ethnicities and sects across Turkey. (Yoray Liberman for The New York Times)

Photographs unravel Turkey's ethnic tapestry

By Sabrina Tavernise

Monday, March 10, 2008

SAMSUN, Turkey: They were suspected to be missionaries. Then fugitives. But when the motley band of Turkish intellectuals finally arrived in this Black Sea city last month, people seemed to understand that they really only wanted to tell stories.

The group - a Kurdish feminist, an Armenian writer, and an academic and a photographer, both Turkish - were presenting a book of photographs of people from Turkey.

The book counted 44 different ethnicities and sects across Turkey, and captured them in pictures dancing, eating, praying, laughing and playing music. If it sounds innocuous, it was not. Turkey, a country that has had four military coups in its 85-year history, has a very specific line on cultural diversity: Anyone who lives in Turkey is a Turk. Period.

Attila Durak, a New York trained photographer, compiled the book, traveling around Turkey for seven consecutive summers, living with families and taking their portraits.

His intent was to show that Turkey is a constantly changing kaleidoscope of different cultures, not a hard piece of marble monoculture as the Turkish state says, and that acknowledging those differences is an important step toward a healthier society.

"People see themselves in the photographs, and they realize they are no different," said Durak, whose book, "Ebru: Reflections of Cultural Diversity in Turkey," was published in 2006. "Those Kurdish people have kids who play together like ours," he said, referring to viewers' reactions. "Look, they dance the same kind of wedding dance."

Ever since Turkey became a state in 1923, it has been scrubbing its citizens of identities other than Turkish. In some ways, that was necessary as a glue to hold the young country together. European powers were intent on carving up its territory, a patchwork of remains from the collapsed Ottoman Empire, and Muslim Turkishness was a unifying ideology.

But it forced families from different backgrounds, who spoke different languages, such as Armenian, Kurdish, Greek, Georgian, Macedonian, Bosnian, to hide their identities. Family histories, such as the crushing events of Turkey's genocide against Armenians in 1915, were never spoken of, and children grew up not knowing their own past or identity.

"Memories like that were whispered into ears behind closed doors," said Fethiye Cetin, a lawyer who learned only in her 20s that her grandmother was Armenian. "There was a big fear involved in this, so the community itself perpetuated the silence."

It is that locked past Durak and his colleagues seek to open. Their method is telling their own stories to audiences across Turkey as an accompaniment to exhibits of Durak's photographs to open a conversation about the past and chip away at stereotypes.

The academic, Ayse Gul Altinay, an anthropology professor from Sabanci University in Istanbul, is a kind of national psychiatrist, identifying the most painful points from the country's past and offering a way to think about them that is most direct route to healing.

She uses the Turkish art form, Ebru, the process of paper marbling that produces constantly changing interwoven patterns, as a metaphor for multiculturalism.

"We're not a mosaic, different from one another and fixed in glass," said Altinay, who earned her doctorate from Duke University. "Ebru is done on water. It is impossible to have clear lines or distinct borders."

In Samsun, a bustling city with a nationalist reputation, the fifth in Turkey to see the exhibition, the audience was small but interested. The Armenian writer, Takuhi Tovmasyan, talked about how she was gruffly banished from a piano recital hall after winning a competition, when teachers learned her last name, which is overtly Armenian.

"I hid this feeling for a long time," said Tovmasyan, who has published a book of family recipes and stories as way to open up a conversation about the past. "But when I saw these photographs, I decided I needed to talk about it."

The discussions have hit a nerve. At a presentation in Kars, an eastern Turkish city, a man in his 50s wearing a suit spoke through tears about discovering that his family had been Molokan, Russian Old Believers. It was the first time he was speaking publicly about it, he said. Others have apologized to Tovmasyan in emotional outpourings.

In Samsun, a young man in a white sweatshirt said, "I personally apologize for 'Get out,' on behalf of all my friends," eliciting applause. "It's really a terrible thing."

Durak's subjects look into his camera with a directness that is startling. A Jewish man sits in a chair in Istanbul. A gypsy in a flower print shirt plays the saxophone. A woman from the Black Sea stands in a doorway, her fingers touching her collarbone.

Each one is labeled for ethnicity and sect, a method of categorization that initially struck the local authorities in Samsun as something close to a seditious act.

"They said, 'we have to investigate, maybe they are wanted by the police,' " said Ozlem Yalcinkaya, an organizer from a student group, Community Volunteers Foundation, who arranged the exhibit. "I said, 'If they are fugitives, why would they be putting their names on the exhibition posters?' "

Another one of their questions went to the heart of what the group is trying to change. When it was revealed that Tovmasyan was Armenian, police officials were stumped.

"What do you mean Armenian," Yalcinkaya recalled an officer saying. "A Turkish citizen, or from Armenia?"

The answer was both - a Turkish citizen of Armenian descent - but because the Turkish state does not recognize mixed identities, the concept was foreign and baffling to the police.

In the end, the authorities relented, and the municipality even allowed use of its lecture hall.

"The genie is out of the bottle," Altinay said. "Too many people are interested in looking into who we are, who lived on this land before us," for the healing process to be stopped.

A young woman in the audience echoed that thought, as she apologized to Tovmasyan. For as gloomy as the past was, the future was more hopeful, she said, because young people are much more flexible and accepting than the older generations.

"In a few years time, a lot of people will be doing a lot of apologizing," she said.

http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/03/10/ ... turkey.php
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18050
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

Postby Oracle » Mon Mar 17, 2008 9:35 pm

Expatkiwi wrote:You people are missing the point: thanks to what has happened, suspicion has resulted and - Human nature beibng what it is - is going to prevail. If what you say is true in that only a tiny minority of G/C's wanted enosis, then they are the ones to blame for all that has transpired. Also Makarios in his initial statements (I'm talking about the early 1960's) as the first President of Cyprus...


So on the one hand we have "suspicion" that GCs may have wanted Enosis with Greece.

Whilst one the other hand, we have "fact" that TCs not only wanted Enosis with Turkey all along ... but in fact achieved this goal.

Yet despite our current situation, where as EU partners with Greece, there is no logical reason for Enosis ... you imply that the TCs are so stupid that they tremble with fear for a fantasy?
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests