Insan wrote: I think, afterwards 1982, Turkish side lost its hopes for a federal reunification and wanted to open a path for recognition as a seperate state.
What hopes?Are you still totally unaware of the game Denktash was playing?
wrote: Perhaps the proposals of Turkish side would have been rejected by GC side but Turkish side would have shown its willingness to solve the problem. To the contrary of these, Denktash and his team had most of the times been seemed like the intrasigence side.
What were the proposals of Denktas? Do you know them or you just fantasise? His proposals were always for a lose confederation=disguised partition, complete exchange of properties (i.e exchange 1 for 20-how clever ha?).
Read your own extract from the Cyprus conflict The Americans materialised it by donating you the Anan Plan.
wrote: It's true that Hellenic lobby had a huge role of creating such a negative international impression about Denktash and Turkish side
So when Hannay himself described him as a rotard he was influenced by your imaginarry Hellenic lobby? I can give you another 100 of examples if you are interested. Denktash DID NOT hide his negativeness to ANY solution other than agreed partition. That's why he eventually refused to even go at Lucerne.
wrote: The settlers shouldn't have been given the GC properties for free. The GC properties should have been rented to settlers with the market prices of the North. Such a measure would have stopped most of the settlers to rush to North.
Any more bright ideas? Who gave you the right to even sell our properties to settlers?
wrote: Exchange of properties.
See last post in the "EU court ruling" thread. I recently revealed you
this is a myth!!!! The TCs left behind 1/3rd of the land they got, whereas valuewise they got 20 times more. There can be no exchange of equal to equal properties!
Turkcyp wrote: You are right. WE are not being fair to Denktas. He is worse than him....
Compared to the founder of TMT, the chief thief of GC properties, and a so called president who only knew how to bring all negotiations to a dead end?
I wouldn’t expect anything different from a Denktash oglani anyway...
Cannedmoose wrote: I'm impressed at the poll figures so far... perhaps we will miss him after all...
Impressed??!! Be informed then that deep inside
ALL the Tcs know very well where Denktash brought them at. Their only complain is that he did not fullfil their dream for recognition. If he would they would all forget about Ataturk and make them their new Father.
Too bad TC mates. Now you have to live with your Talaturi. The only difference is that Ankara was so far doing what Denktash was telling them.Talat will be doing whatever Ankara is telling him. That's the only difference. Good luck!