Piratis wrote:May I add that the Kurds own a specific region in Turkey while TCs do not.
I have corrected this for you before but you seem to ignore the facts. The areas Kurds claim as part of Kurdistan in Turkey is not solely owned by Kurds. Do you think everybody in the southeast of Turkey is Kurd. Southeast of Turkey is mixed exactly like Cyprus, but not even two ethnicities but three Turks, Kurds, and Arabs.
Majority of Kurdish population in Turkey lives in these areas. That is true. But this even does not mean that they are majority in all of those areas. And Furthermore where do you draw the line of borders? What constitutes border. I can draw you maps in Cyprus as well where clearly TCs were tha majority. Take for example, north of Nicosia. The regions had been always been majority of TCs. According to you TCs can have their own country in that tiny region. (There are smaller countries in the world). But the fact remains is that TCs did not have right to have their own country in that region. Roght of self-determination is not equal to rioght of secesion. (same true for GCs as well) You get my point. What makes one map more important than the other?
Having said all of these TCs, Kurds, GCs all have self-determination rights. But none of them so far has earned the accepatance of the international community ti turn those self-determination rights into right of secesion from an existing state with borders.
You guys had never do any research on issues, but simply stick to the same line even though it is proven that the facts does not support your analysis.