The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


so why dont they..

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

so why dont they..

Postby souroul » Sun Mar 02, 2008 3:30 pm

one day kidnap the negotiations committee from both sides and toss them in a hotel until they find a solution. no exterior interference. just maybe a mediator team from all the members of the security council to just maybe throw in an opinion about what sounds fair and what not
souroul
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 502
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 6:04 pm

Postby paliometoxo » Sun Mar 02, 2008 3:44 pm

forcing a solution as we found in the past does not help
User avatar
paliometoxo
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8837
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2007 3:55 pm
Location: Nicosia, paliometocho

Postby utu » Tue Mar 04, 2008 7:13 am

paliometoxo wrote:forcing a solution as we found in the past does not help


The problem though, Paliometoxo, is that if neither side wants to come to a solution (and a solution for Cyprus is going to entail give-and-take on both sides), a third party is going to be needed to push one through. Didn't someone say that the art of diplomacy entails leaving both sides dis-satisfied to some degree?
User avatar
utu
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 944
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 6:32 am
Location: British Columbia

Postby DT. » Tue Mar 04, 2008 10:37 am

utu wrote:
paliometoxo wrote:forcing a solution as we found in the past does not help


The problem though, Paliometoxo, is that if neither side wants to come to a solution (and a solution for Cyprus is going to entail give-and-take on both sides), a third party is going to be needed to push one through. Didn't someone say that the art of diplomacy entails leaving both sides dis-satisfied to some degree?


If neither side wants a solution then there won't be a need for one.

You can't force a solution to the people.
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Re: so why dont they..

Postby Oracle » Tue Mar 04, 2008 10:42 am

souroul wrote:one day kidnap the negotiations committee from both sides and toss them in a hotel until they find a solution. no exterior interference. just maybe a mediator team from all the members of the security council to just maybe throw in an opinion about what sounds fair and what not


Who are the "negotiations committee"?

Would they be allowed room service?
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby Tim Drayton » Tue Mar 04, 2008 10:50 am

utu wrote:
paliometoxo wrote:forcing a solution as we found in the past does not help


The problem though, Paliometoxo, is that if neither side wants to come to a solution (and a solution for Cyprus is going to entail give-and-take on both sides), a third party is going to be needed to push one through. Didn't someone say that the art of diplomacy entails leaving both sides dis-satisfied to some degree?


I think it is third party intervention that has always been at the root of the Cyprus problem. Ever since the Zurich and London Agreements, which were imposed from the outside, all the initiatives that have been launched to clear up the mess, such as the Acheson Plan and all the United Nations initiatives such as Gali's Set of Ideas and the Annan Plan, share one thing in common. They involve outsiders coming in and telling Cypriots how they should run their affairs.

The Cyprus problem can only be solved by Cypriots. Any other approach breaches the principle of self determination. This time, let the representatives of the two main communities on the island come together and produce a settlement with no external interference. The rest of the world should then respect the result as being the expression of Cypriots' right to self determination. Even if the conclusion is that both communities should henceforth go their own ways. I am hopeful that now both communities are represented by the left, reunification has a chance.
User avatar
Tim Drayton
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8799
Joined: Sat Jul 21, 2007 1:32 am
Location: Limassol/Lemesos

Postby purdey » Tue Mar 04, 2008 11:01 am

SOLUTION....Pull out the UN,leave the Green Line.Let them get on with it.
Too much talk not enough action,both sides have had their chances and have not acted.
purdey
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3549
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 9:06 pm

Postby Jerry » Tue Mar 04, 2008 11:08 am

Tim Drayton wrote:
utu wrote:
paliometoxo wrote:forcing a solution as we found in the past does not help


The problem though, Paliometoxo, is that if neither side wants to come to a solution (and a solution for Cyprus is going to entail give-and-take on both sides), a third party is going to be needed to push one through. Didn't someone say that the art of diplomacy entails leaving both sides dis-satisfied to some degree?


I think it is third party intervention that has always been at the root of the Cyprus problem. Ever since the Zurich and London Agreements, which were imposed from the outside, all the initiatives that have been launched to clear up the mess, such as the Acheson Plan and all the United Nations initiatives such as Gali's Set of Ideas and the Annan Plan, share one thing in common. They involve outsiders coming in and telling Cypriots how they should run their affairs.

The Cyprus problem can only be solved by Cypriots. Any other approach breaches the principle of self determination. This time, let the representatives of the two main communities on the island come together and produce a settlement with no external interference. The rest of the world should then respect the result as being the expression of Cypriots' right to self determination. Even if the conclusion is that both communities should henceforth go their own ways. I am hopeful that now both communities are represented by the left, reunification has a chance.


It may be a good idea to attempt a solution without outside interference but outside influence will always be there, for example Turkey's proximity to the island, the fact that there are 40,000 Turkish soldiers on the island and ROC's membership of the EU. Both sides will always try to use these "strengths" to their advantage. The fairest way would be to start with a blank sheet of paper and for an international (no Greeks, Turks, Brits or Americans) court to impose a constitution based on recognised democratic principles - guess who would oppose such a proposal
Jerry
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4730
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:29 pm
Location: UK

Postby Nikitas » Tue Mar 04, 2008 11:47 am

Purdey wrote:

"SOLUTION....Pull out the UN,leave the Green Line.Let them get on with it. "

With 40 000 Turkish soldiers and 400 tanks in the north that sounds more like a recipe for disaster than a solution method. Similar to throwing a terrier in a barrel with a badger, if you know what I mean.
Nikitas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7420
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:49 pm

Postby purdey » Tue Mar 04, 2008 11:58 am

That old bone has been chewed over too many times.Turkey has no intention of invading Southern Cyprus with or without the Green Line.
I am afraid the Green Line is a convenient excuse for prolonging the Cyprus Problem...
purdey
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3549
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 9:06 pm

Next

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests