The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


USA says

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby halil » Wed Feb 27, 2008 3:44 pm

BUSH EXPRESSED US’S READINESS TO COOPERATE AND ASSIST IN EFFORTS AIMED SOLVING THE CYPRUS PROBLEM.
The US President George W. Bush has announced that his country is ready to assist efforts aimed at solving the Cyprus problem.

The US President sent a congratulatory letter to Greek Cypriot leader-elect Dimitris Christofias
In his letter, the US President expressed the desire of the US government to continue its close cooperation with South Cyprus on a wide range of bilateral issues and in the search for a settlement that will reunify the island.

The letter was passed on to Mr. Christofias by the US ambassador to Cyprus Ronald Schlicker.

Speaking to the press after meeting with the newly elected Greek Cypriot leader, Ronald Schlicker said that Christofias assured him that he had similar intentions as regards bilateral relations.

Asked about a possible new initiative on Cyprus, the Ambassador expressed the hope that the contacts between the new Greek Cypriot leader and President Mehmet Ali Talat will encourage the UN to act more quickly.

Replying to a question regarding the 8 July Agreement, reached in 2006 between outgoing Greek Cypriot leader Tassos Papadopoulos and President Mehmet Ali Talat, in the presence of UN Under-Secretary for Political Affairs Ibrahim Gambari, Schlicker said “the agreement is there and it’s a vehicle to be used.”

Mr Schlicker also said it is necessary to re-start the negotiations process as soon as possible.
halil
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8804
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:21 pm
Location: nicosia

Postby denizaksulu » Wed Feb 27, 2008 3:45 pm

Get Real! wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
Get Real! wrote:Halil, it's time you asked yourself... does anyone actually read all that?

It's also time the Admin explained to you and others about the costs of precious hard disk space which is not infinite.



GR, if that is the case, I assume you are correct, is there another way you could suggest? Reference is always made to past resolutions and responses from TCs etc. How do we solve this. Your positive input on this matter will be appreciated, but then you would be aiding and abetting the opposition. :wink: :wink: Many of us have no access to such documents.
Alternative arrangements, please. :lol:

A screen-full seems alright, but myriads of pages is not! Just post the link if it's too long and when you quote someone just grab the relevant lines for reference instead of the whole thing. Better text management from all of us will go a long way.

This forum must be using a dedicated server or two, with 4..6 SCSI hard disks in a RAID formation… that’s expensive in terms of parts cost AND maintenance. Let’s show some respect for that please.


GR says:

"dedicated server or two, with 4..6 SCSI hard disks in a RAID formation"

:shock: :shock: :shock: :oops: :oops: Whats that when he's at home?

I suppose if they are in file format of sorts it should be possible. Hear that Halil? We must not disrespect the hosts now. :twisted:
User avatar
denizaksulu
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 36077
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 11:04 am

Postby DT. » Wed Feb 27, 2008 3:48 pm

zan wrote:
DT. wrote:
zan wrote:
DT. wrote:
zan wrote:
DT. wrote:
Expatkiwi wrote:The Set of Ideas on an Overall Framework Agreement on Cyprus (1992) sounds like an equitable soloution, except that the layout is more a confederal than a federal setup. That point aside, which side dropped the ball on this and why?


Accepted as a basis of a negotiation by Vassiliou and rejected by Denktash.

As far as VP and Zan are concerned the GC' rejected all proposals :lol:


Give us more details DT 8)

Your line of "accepted by Vassiliou as a basis of a negotiation", was accepted by both so your twisting the words to win a point that you lost before you started is pure rubbish my friend........Wanna try again....... :lol: :lol: :lol:



You are stooping to a new low guv!!!!!! :roll: Now lets have the real reasons shall we....... :arrow: :arrow:


Very simple....... Guv :roll:

Vassiliou accepted it as a basis to negotiate and Denktash did not. Am not sure what more you need?


Bullshit again mate... :roll: :roll: Both sides agreed to talk and that is a fact...The talks broke down, that is all......As I said...Your wording needs reviewing.......Have another go!!! :roll:


http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/9418.pdf

Sec General Report of Nov 19th puts blame on Denktash for talks breakdown. Anything else Guv?



See what I mean...Bullshit...... :roll: You said that an AGREEMENT was rejexted......OR...At least you "IMPLIED"....


"The Secretary General’s April 5, 1992
“Set of Ideas” is a framework for negotiations
for an overall settlement. The Security
Council implied Turkish Cypriot leader Rauf
Denktash’s responsibility for their failure and
called for confidence-building measures
(CBMs)."


They both agreed to the talks and that is what you are disputing.....
:roll: :lol: :lol: :lol:


You've forgotten what you've been arguing about haven't you? Thats not th first time you do it. SOmeone asks why did these talks fail, I respond with Denktash, produce a UN sec resolution to prove it along with a Sec Gen report and you're going on about god knows what. :roll:
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby denizaksulu » Wed Feb 27, 2008 3:48 pm

zan wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
Get Real! wrote:Halil, it's time you asked yourself... does anyone actually read all that?

It's also time the Admin explained to you and others about the costs of precious hard disk space which is not infinite.



GR, if that is the case, I assume you are correct, is there another way you could suggest? Reference is always made to past resolutions and responses from TCs etc. How do we solve this. Your positive input on this matter will be appreciated, but then you would be aiding and abetting the opposition. :wink: :wink: Many of us have no access to such documents.
Alternative arrangements, please. :lol:

A screen-full seems alright, but myriads of pages is not! Just post the link if it's too long and when you quote someone just grab the relevant lines for reference instead of the whole thing. Better text management from all of us will go a long way.

This forum must be using a dedicated server or two, with 4..6 SCSI hard disks in a RAID formation… that’s expensive in terms of parts cost AND maintenance. Let’s show some respect for that please.


Even DT doesn't bother to read anything other than his own stuff so maybe the lazy ones are being catered for :wink: :lol:



Perhaps they will just look at the origin of the link and by-pass it all. :lol:
User avatar
denizaksulu
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 36077
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 11:04 am

Postby zan » Wed Feb 27, 2008 3:49 pm

:lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby denizaksulu » Wed Feb 27, 2008 3:49 pm

Good to have you back Zan. Things must be ok now. It felt a bit lonely here. :lol:
User avatar
denizaksulu
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 36077
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 11:04 am

Postby DT. » Wed Feb 27, 2008 3:49 pm

zan wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
Get Real! wrote:Halil, it's time you asked yourself... does anyone actually read all that?

It's also time the Admin explained to you and others about the costs of precious hard disk space which is not infinite.



GR, if that is the case, I assume you are correct, is there another way you could suggest? Reference is always made to past resolutions and responses from TCs etc. How do we solve this. Your positive input on this matter will be appreciated, but then you would be aiding and abetting the opposition. :wink: :wink: Many of us have no access to such documents.
Alternative arrangements, please. :lol:

A screen-full seems alright, but myriads of pages is not! Just post the link if it's too long and when you quote someone just grab the relevant lines for reference instead of the whole thing. Better text management from all of us will go a long way.

This forum must be using a dedicated server or two, with 4..6 SCSI hard disks in a RAID formation… that’s expensive in terms of parts cost AND maintenance. Let’s show some respect for that please.


Even DT doesn't bother to read anything other than his own stuff so maybe the lazy ones are being catered for :wink: :lol:


sorry Zan, must be a bit slow today...was that meant as an insult?
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby zan » Wed Feb 27, 2008 3:59 pm

denizaksulu wrote:Good to have you back Zan. Things must be ok now. It felt a bit lonely here. :lol:


Thanks Gardas!!! Still fighting with the demons I am afraid but getting better......

How can you feel lonely with so much in the way of garagozluk in here since the elections....... :wink: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby zan » Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:01 pm

DT. wrote:
zan wrote:
DT. wrote:
zan wrote:
DT. wrote:
zan wrote:
DT. wrote:
Expatkiwi wrote:The Set of Ideas on an Overall Framework Agreement on Cyprus (1992) sounds like an equitable soloution, except that the layout is more a confederal than a federal setup. That point aside, which side dropped the ball on this and why?


Accepted as a basis of a negotiation by Vassiliou and rejected by Denktash.

As far as VP and Zan are concerned the GC' rejected all proposals :lol:


Give us more details DT 8)

Your line of "accepted by Vassiliou as a basis of a negotiation", was accepted by both so your twisting the words to win a point that you lost before you started is pure rubbish my friend........Wanna try again....... :lol: :lol: :lol:



You are stooping to a new low guv!!!!!! :roll: Now lets have the real reasons shall we....... :arrow: :arrow:


Very simple....... Guv :roll:

Vassiliou accepted it as a basis to negotiate and Denktash did not. Am not sure what more you need?


Bullshit again mate... :roll: :roll: Both sides agreed to talk and that is a fact...The talks broke down, that is all......As I said...Your wording needs reviewing.......Have another go!!! :roll:


http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/9418.pdf

Sec General Report of Nov 19th puts blame on Denktash for talks breakdown. Anything else Guv?



See what I mean...Bullshit...... :roll: You said that an AGREEMENT was rejexted......OR...At least you "IMPLIED"....


"The Secretary General’s April 5, 1992
“Set of Ideas” is a framework for negotiations
for an overall settlement. The Security
Council implied Turkish Cypriot leader Rauf
Denktash’s responsibility for their failure and
called for confidence-building measures
(CBMs)."


They both agreed to the talks and that is what you are disputing.....
:roll: :lol: :lol: :lol:


You've forgotten what you've been arguing about haven't you? Thats not th first time you do it. SOmeone asks why did these talks fail, I respond with Denktash, produce a UN sec resolution to prove it along with a Sec Gen report and you're going on about god knows what. :roll:


I think it is more a case of you not knowing what the hell you were saying from the beginning mate........You made a statement and then fell apart when it came to backing it up......If you knew what you were saying in the first place then you would have followed all the way through but hey ho!.... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Postby denizaksulu » Wed Feb 27, 2008 4:09 pm

zan wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:Good to have you back Zan. Things must be ok now. It felt a bit lonely here. :lol:


Thanks Gardas!!! Still fighting with the demons I am afraid but getting better......

How can you feel lonely with so much in the way of garagozluk in here since the elections....... :wink: :lol: :lol:



USA says (just to keep on topic), your Turkish is not that bad. Gecmis olsun. :lol:
User avatar
denizaksulu
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 36077
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 11:04 am

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests