Halil, it's time you asked yourself... does anyone actually read all that?
It's also time the Admin explained to you and others about the costs of precious hard disk space which is not infinite.
Get Real! wrote:Halil, it's time you asked yourself... does anyone actually read all that?
It's also time the Admin explained to you and others about the costs of precious hard disk space which is not infinite.
Get Real! wrote:Halil, it's time you asked yourself... does anyone actually read all that?
It's also time the Admin explained to you and others about the costs of precious hard disk space which is not infinite.
Get Real! wrote:Halil, it's time you asked yourself... does anyone actually read all that?
It's also time the Admin explained to you and others about the costs of precious hard disk space which is not infinite.
Get Real! wrote:Halil, it's time you asked yourself... does anyone actually read all that?
It's also time the Admin explained to you and others about the costs of precious hard disk space which is not infinite.
halil wrote:Get Real! wrote:Halil, it's time you asked yourself... does anyone actually read all that?
It's also time the Admin explained to you and others about the costs of precious hard disk space which is not infinite.
GR,
Be real man real.
Let the people get more information about past . Most of them doesn't know about them .
After a while he can delete them mate . Few weeks later this tread will finish others will start .
Didn't you find them informative .Take your time and learn mate or refresh your memory than you will not confuse with new plans .........
DT. wrote:zan wrote:DT. wrote:zan wrote:DT. wrote:Expatkiwi wrote:The Set of Ideas on an Overall Framework Agreement on Cyprus (1992) sounds like an equitable soloution, except that the layout is more a confederal than a federal setup. That point aside, which side dropped the ball on this and why?
Accepted as a basis of a negotiation by Vassiliou and rejected by Denktash.
As far as VP and Zan are concerned the GC' rejected all proposals
Give us more details DT
Your line of "accepted by Vassiliou as a basis of a negotiation", was accepted by both so your twisting the words to win a point that you lost before you started is pure rubbish my friend........Wanna try again.......
You are stooping to a new low guv!!!!!! Now lets have the real reasons shall we.......
Very simple....... Guv
Vassiliou accepted it as a basis to negotiate and Denktash did not. Am not sure what more you need?
Bullshit again mate... Both sides agreed to talk and that is a fact...The talks broke down, that is all......As I said...Your wording needs reviewing.......Have another go!!!
http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/9418.pdf
Sec General Report of Nov 19th puts blame on Denktash for talks breakdown. Anything else Guv?
Get Real! wrote:halil wrote:Get Real! wrote:Halil, it's time you asked yourself... does anyone actually read all that?
It's also time the Admin explained to you and others about the costs of precious hard disk space which is not infinite.
GR,
Be real man real.
Let the people get more information about past . Most of them doesn't know about them .
After a while he can delete them mate . Few weeks later this tread will finish others will start .
Didn't you find them informative .Take your time and learn mate or refresh your memory than you will not confuse with new plans .........
Just post the link for Allah's sake and let people read it from there...
denizaksulu wrote:Get Real! wrote:Halil, it's time you asked yourself... does anyone actually read all that?
It's also time the Admin explained to you and others about the costs of precious hard disk space which is not infinite.
GR, if that is the case, I assume you are correct, is there another way you could suggest? Reference is always made to past resolutions and responses from TCs etc. How do we solve this. Your positive input on this matter will be appreciated, but then you would be aiding and abetting the opposition. Many of us have no access to such documents.
Alternative arrangements, please.
Get Real! wrote:denizaksulu wrote:Get Real! wrote:Halil, it's time you asked yourself... does anyone actually read all that?
It's also time the Admin explained to you and others about the costs of precious hard disk space which is not infinite.
GR, if that is the case, I assume you are correct, is there another way you could suggest? Reference is always made to past resolutions and responses from TCs etc. How do we solve this. Your positive input on this matter will be appreciated, but then you would be aiding and abetting the opposition. Many of us have no access to such documents.
Alternative arrangements, please.
A screen-full seems alright, but myriads of pages is not! Just post the link if it's too long and when you quote someone just grab the relevant lines for reference instead of the whole thing. Better text management from all of us will go a long way.
This forum must be using a dedicated server or two, with 4..6 SCSI hard disks in a RAID formation… that’s expensive in terms of parts cost AND maintenance. Let’s show some respect for that please.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests