I side with the enemy? Am I wrong in saying that you sided with Denktas to bury the A plan that was to end 30 years of occupation?
We are the great majority. Who are you, and whose interests are you serving? Definitely not the interests of the great majority (those are us)
The Annan plan made us a second category citizens, with 1/4th of the voting power of some others something that will NEVER be accepted. It legalized the illegal actions of Turkey (something I never saw you complaining about), and it didn't solve our problem.
We didn't side with Denctash. We didn't go in the occupied areas to celebrate with him, like you did with Talad. (who is the other side of the same coin)
He just says what he believes is right. You can disagree but you cannot call him a traitor just because he disagrees with the "official" opinion.
Remember Andrik? Do you think that the things he said was just his opinion and the rest of us should not react? (by the way, apparently he was baned because many members complained about him).
Andrik and Bananiot are the two extremes (not a surprise that they belong to the same party) and the rest of us that believe in democracy and human rights should protect Cyprus from such extremists that do not respect the democratically expressed will of the great majority, and they continue to throw mud and try to hurt Cyprus.
Most Cypriots were not involved.
What do you mean by "most"? If you add women, children and the old people, then of course most people were not involved directly. However the great majority of GCs supported the EOKA because the cause was a just one.
For me there is a difference between:
a) The cause of EOKA was wrong, being under the British was fine (what Bananiot is saying)
and
b) The way that some of the EOKA fighters/leaders acted was wrong and in some cases even criminal (what I am saying)
I hope you can see the difference between the two.