Bananiot wrote:Of course anyone can vote in any way he or she likes. This is not disputed, it is an unquestionable right in a democracy. It is also my right and everyone else's right to criticise behaviours, actions and inactions. I have the impression that many Paphians will stand against a solution to the Cyprob (even a "good" one) because they think that their economic development will suffer as a result of the solution. Of course, generalisations are not productive, thus I stand to eat my words if the majority of Paphians were to be anything like Miltiades.
Bananiot this is the most insular, parochial view I have heard branded about as a blackmailing attempt to settle for any solution at any long-term costs to Cyprus. Definitely worthy to discuss with the village women tomorrow during coffee time
No one would dispute that wealth would increase many-fold around the island, if the bad atmosphere that now prevails due to being held to ransom by Turkey ... were to end. So your argument is a non-starter.
The counter argument to yours would have to be, that as vast a sympathy vote as the refugees deserve .. and their return to their homes of paramount and indisputable importance ... a solution to the Cyprus problem for the
long term good of the whole island, cannot be abandoned just to please those unfortunate refugees that quite understandably are just desperate to get back to their rightful homes.
And as for Paphitians .... my father gave away his family home to a refugee family ... even though he had to work to make a living.