The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Choosing between the two!

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby Oracle » Mon Feb 25, 2008 10:24 am

The system in the UK meant I could never have the party I voted for ... the Liberal Democrats ... assume power.

So they have just two swinging parties playing with taxation and meddling in other countries, and not much else in terms of policy.
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby michalis5354 » Mon Feb 25, 2008 10:27 am

Does any know when the current Greek national anthem be replaced to a Cypriot National Anthem? and When the Greek Flags be removed from the street? I hope our New president follows what he preaches and not say one thing and do another the next day....Otherwise we are going to watch a Comedy. Lets wait and see....

Again may I repeat Despite the above collusion DUSI has won a big % of other parties. If you think you can ignore all these people that have accepted K philosophy you will get a big slap on the face....
User avatar
michalis5354
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1521
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 10:48 am

Postby Oracle » Mon Feb 25, 2008 10:29 am

DT. wrote:
Piratis wrote:
DT. wrote:
Piratis wrote:
As if our constitution says that regardless of what the people want or vote for, this small party in the centre will be in every single govt whether the people want them there or not.!


It is no "small party" and it is not just one party. The center as a whole represents about 1/3rd of the people of Cyprus. Another 3rd is the the right, and another 3rd is the left. Two of these 3rds have to cooperate in order to elect a government. If you don't want the center in the government then you have to cooperate with the other extreme. You are free to do it if you and they wish. But obviously being on the opposite extremes makes such cooperation implausible.


Pirati, thee is nothing wrong with a 2 party system. The US and the UK are doing absolutely fine with it. It actually promotes democracy and makes sure that smaller parties are no respresented in a govt when a party with a much larger percentage is kept out.

Democratically who should be represented more in govt today? The 33% of DISY supporters or the 15% of DEKO supporters? I say the more we move to the 2 larger parties the closer these 2 parties will be forced to move to each other. This will make up the gap left behind by the smaller central parties and will ensure that you get te govt you vote for...not the govt 15% voted for.


Soryy DT. but what you say doesn't make sense.

Christofias was voted by 53%+ of the people, not 15%.

In order to get 50%+ then obviously you have make a proposal that will be acceptable by the majority. If you have an extreme position, while it might satisfy some people at a higher degree, it will not satisfy at all some others, and therefore you will not have a 50%+ support.

And if we had just 2 parties, and those parties were forced to move close to each other, then the citizens would have what options? Just two parties that are more or less the same? You find this democratic?

If DISY and AKEL agree, and they disagree with the other 3rd, then there is nothing in our system that stops AKEL and DISY to partner and leave the other 3rd out.


Interesting argument, but how can you call te Democrats and the Republicans undemocratic? Or the conservatives and Labour?

My point is that a party such as EDEK with 7-8% of the vote is now in govt with a minister or two. DEKO with a 15% vote is now in govt with 30% of the ministerial jos in the govt. DISY with 33% of the vote is not. Thats undemocratic the fact that 8% of the vote can affect and take govt deicsions whereas 33% is sidelined.


53% + 7% + 15% = 75% of the population are represented in Government ...

Good going .... :D
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby DT. » Mon Feb 25, 2008 10:31 am

Oracle wrote:
DT. wrote:
Piratis wrote:
DT. wrote:
Piratis wrote:
As if our constitution says that regardless of what the people want or vote for, this small party in the centre will be in every single govt whether the people want them there or not.!


It is no "small party" and it is not just one party. The center as a whole represents about 1/3rd of the people of Cyprus. Another 3rd is the the right, and another 3rd is the left. Two of these 3rds have to cooperate in order to elect a government. If you don't want the center in the government then you have to cooperate with the other extreme. You are free to do it if you and they wish. But obviously being on the opposite extremes makes such cooperation implausible.


Pirati, thee is nothing wrong with a 2 party system. The US and the UK are doing absolutely fine with it. It actually promotes democracy and makes sure that smaller parties are no respresented in a govt when a party with a much larger percentage is kept out.

Democratically who should be represented more in govt today? The 33% of DISY supporters or the 15% of DEKO supporters? I say the more we move to the 2 larger parties the closer these 2 parties will be forced to move to each other. This will make up the gap left behind by the smaller central parties and will ensure that you get te govt you vote for...not the govt 15% voted for.


Soryy DT. but what you say doesn't make sense.

Christofias was voted by 53%+ of the people, not 15%.

In order to get 50%+ then obviously you have make a proposal that will be acceptable by the majority. If you have an extreme position, while it might satisfy some people at a higher degree, it will not satisfy at all some others, and therefore you will not have a 50%+ support.

And if we had just 2 parties, and those parties were forced to move close to each other, then the citizens would have what options? Just two parties that are more or less the same? You find this democratic?

If DISY and AKEL agree, and they disagree with the other 3rd, then there is nothing in our system that stops AKEL and DISY to partner and leave the other 3rd out.


Interesting argument, but how can you call te Democrats and the Republicans undemocratic? Or the conservatives and Labour?

My point is that a party such as EDEK with 7-8% of the vote is now in govt with a minister or two. DEKO with a 15% vote is now in govt with 30% of the ministerial jos in the govt. DISY with 33% of the vote is not. Thats undemocratic the fact that 8% of the vote can affect and take govt deicsions whereas 33% is sidelined.


53% + 7% + 15% = 75% of the population are represented in Government ...

Good going .... :D


I see your maths is as good as your diplomatic skill :lol:
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby Oracle » Mon Feb 25, 2008 10:32 am

DT. wrote:
Oracle wrote:
DT. wrote:
Piratis wrote:
DT. wrote:
Piratis wrote:
As if our constitution says that regardless of what the people want or vote for, this small party in the centre will be in every single govt whether the people want them there or not.!


It is no "small party" and it is not just one party. The center as a whole represents about 1/3rd of the people of Cyprus. Another 3rd is the the right, and another 3rd is the left. Two of these 3rds have to cooperate in order to elect a government. If you don't want the center in the government then you have to cooperate with the other extreme. You are free to do it if you and they wish. But obviously being on the opposite extremes makes such cooperation implausible.


Pirati, thee is nothing wrong with a 2 party system. The US and the UK are doing absolutely fine with it. It actually promotes democracy and makes sure that smaller parties are no respresented in a govt when a party with a much larger percentage is kept out.

Democratically who should be represented more in govt today? The 33% of DISY supporters or the 15% of DEKO supporters? I say the more we move to the 2 larger parties the closer these 2 parties will be forced to move to each other. This will make up the gap left behind by the smaller central parties and will ensure that you get te govt you vote for...not the govt 15% voted for.


Soryy DT. but what you say doesn't make sense.

Christofias was voted by 53%+ of the people, not 15%.

In order to get 50%+ then obviously you have make a proposal that will be acceptable by the majority. If you have an extreme position, while it might satisfy some people at a higher degree, it will not satisfy at all some others, and therefore you will not have a 50%+ support.

And if we had just 2 parties, and those parties were forced to move close to each other, then the citizens would have what options? Just two parties that are more or less the same? You find this democratic?

If DISY and AKEL agree, and they disagree with the other 3rd, then there is nothing in our system that stops AKEL and DISY to partner and leave the other 3rd out.


Interesting argument, but how can you call te Democrats and the Republicans undemocratic? Or the conservatives and Labour?

My point is that a party such as EDEK with 7-8% of the vote is now in govt with a minister or two. DEKO with a 15% vote is now in govt with 30% of the ministerial jos in the govt. DISY with 33% of the vote is not. Thats undemocratic the fact that 8% of the vote can affect and take govt deicsions whereas 33% is sidelined.


53% + 7% + 15% = 75% of the population are represented in Government ...

Good going .... :D


I see your maths is as good as your diplomatic skill :lol:


..... are you disputing my vital statistics :D
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby Piratis » Mon Feb 25, 2008 10:33 am

Interesting argument, but how can you call te Democrats and the Republicans undemocratic? Or the conservatives and Labour?


I didn't say they are undemocratic, but that what we have here is better since it gives more options to the citizens, instead of one option in two slightly different versions.

My point is that a party such as EDEK with 7-8% of the vote is now in govt with a minister or two. DEKO with a 15% vote is now in govt with 30% of the ministerial jos in the govt. DISY with 33% of the vote is not. Thats undemocratic the fact that 8% of the vote can affect and take govt deicsions whereas 33% is sidelined.


It is not sidelined, it lost the elections. Are you suggesting that we shouldn't have elections and each party should get ministers according to its power in the parliamentary elections?

If we had a two party system with one party at 51% and another at 49% it would mean that the 51% would get the 100% of the ministers, and the 49% would get nothing. How is that different?
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

Postby DT. » Mon Feb 25, 2008 10:33 am

not if we're going to start talking about your behind again. :wink:
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby Piratis » Mon Feb 25, 2008 10:37 am

michalis5354 wrote:Does any know when the current Greek national anthem be replaced to a Cypriot National Anthem? and When the Greek Flags be removed from the street? I hope our New president follows what he preaches and not say one thing and do another the next day....Otherwise we are going to watch a Comedy. Lets wait and see....

Again may I repeat Despite the above collusion DUSI has won a big % of other parties. If you think you can ignore all these people that have accepted K philosophy you will get a big slap on the face....


Where did you read that Christofias "preached" to change the anthem?? Not in some SMS or email send by Kasoulides I hope!!
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

Postby DT. » Mon Feb 25, 2008 10:59 am

Piratis wrote:
michalis5354 wrote:Does any know when the current Greek national anthem be replaced to a Cypriot National Anthem? and When the Greek Flags be removed from the street? I hope our New president follows what he preaches and not say one thing and do another the next day....Otherwise we are going to watch a Comedy. Lets wait and see....

Again may I repeat Despite the above collusion DUSI has won a big % of other parties. If you think you can ignore all these people that have accepted K philosophy you will get a big slap on the face....


Where did you read that Christofias "preached" to change the anthem?? Not in some SMS or email send by Kasoulides I hope!!


I haven't heard him say that either but with a few gestures of goodwill from the other side to match, this wouldn't be a bad idea.(the anthem)
User avatar
DT.
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12684
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 8:34 pm
Location: Lefkosia

Postby michalis5354 » Mon Feb 25, 2008 11:01 am

So If you are not willing to change the Greek National Anthem that violates Independence what makes you any different that those nationalist DUSI who are flying the Greek flags. Double Standards and inconsitent policies!
User avatar
michalis5354
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1521
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 10:48 am

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests