Cyprus-Forum.com

[cannedmoose]

Uzan, I hope you'll reflect on what you just said to Kifeas and not be so emotive in the future. I understand your position, as I do with Kifeas' position too, but that is no reason to let the debate sink to a base level. If you debate this properly, you two could really make some solid progress and maybe even agree on some limited points. I really hope you manage to do so and cease resorting to taunting each other again.

[MicAtCyp]

Turkcyp,

The most important of the proposals described in the decision of ECHR, is that the Committee for Compensations of "Trnc" is supposed to have such powers that it can offer an effective remedy, including the return of the property and the owner to his property under conditions of safety.

The Turkish side considers that with some readjustments of relative "law", the Committee of Compensations will become acceptable by ECHR, as an "internal" legal means.However this is far away from reality unless those changes include among other remedies the return of the property and the return of the owner to his property. That's why I said that by abandoning law No 159 of the "trnc" constitution your whole system will collapse.

Turkey, for political reasons, cannot satisfy the conditions placed by ECHR.
Therefore no matter what, that Committee will always remain unacceptable!

However, this does not mean that Turkey won nothing from objecting the case of Maria Xenides Aresti.She actually gained two years of spare time. In a future case she will make some changes to the jurisdiction of the "Committee of Compensations" and gain some more time. That's all....