The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Barbaric Bisection Backlash! ....

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Re: Barbaric Bisection Backlash! ....

Postby halil » Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:32 pm

Kikapu wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
Oracle wrote:Cyprus has been brutally bisected by belligerent Barbarians.

Nearly 50% is occupied by less than 1/5th of its population; bolstered by 40,000 Turkish troops.

The solution to this scenario by the blackmailing Turk-TCs, is a return to a besotted 1960’s Agreement.

Well why wouldn’t they behest for this? :roll:

This biased, beguiling bumph still retains for the 18% of TCs, 50% control.

Blatant Bisection!

I beseech a backlash to this bisection:

1. No brazen return to the blunders of the ‘60s.
2. Begin a bona fide, balanced solution for a whole Blended Cyprus.
3. Banish the borders bisecting Cyprus, and let us blend.

Phoenix, this must be the weirdest piece I have ever read in all my time on the forum. The choice of words, the inaccuracy of figures, and the vague and overly generalized message it delivers (or lack thereof), confirms that you're not political debate material… :(

ie: What's a "balanced solution"? It's anybody's guess. You say "Banish the borders..." ...sure but HOW?

Come on people, let's make this a little more interesting! :roll:



I agree with you there GR. Definitely no 'political debate material', just like me. I was going to tell her that I agree on all three points, then changed my mind in fear that she would change her mind also. We know that OrPh will under no circumstance will be in agreement with any TC, except perhaps Kikapu. :wink:


1. No brazen return to the blunders of the ‘60s.
2. Begin a bona fide, balanced solution for a whole Blended Cyprus.
3. Banish the borders bisecting Cyprus, and let us blend.


Deniz,

OrPh may well be refering to a "TRUE FEDERATION" with her above quote, which I support. Come to think of it, why doesn't other TC's support a "True Federation". We should give credit to OrPh for opening new chapters for Cyprus, as one country and non of this "two people, two language, two religion, two separate states (countries in disguise) and on and on with the TWO's.

It's beginning to sound more like Noah's Arch for god sake. :lol: :lol:

Image


Kikapu,
Do you hear what the leaders start when they are talking to GC's crowed.
Hellenes of Kipros. and Cyprus is Greek .
Where is the True federation ?
You have no clue at all Kikapu. İ have seen last night what The Disi candidate was saying on the PİK2 Screen and it was live transmission.
Take your time and watch them what there saying on the televisions and newspapers.
Her zamanki gibi gaza gelin.Ah bir kurtula bisen etkilerinden .Gercekleri göreceksin.
halil
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8804
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:21 pm
Location: nicosia

Postby shahmaran » Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:38 pm

Oracle wrote:
shahmaran wrote:Just like i thought Phoenix, ZILCH!

Your silence and evasiveness speaks for itself.
Just get back to starting meaningless racist threads that depend on unfounded crap which you are full of and entertain the boys, its what you are only good at. :roll:


I was answering DT.'s post :roll:



No you were not, you are still doing it.

You just DO NOT have a legitimate answer or view that covers serious violence perpetuated from both sides, all you know is the EVIL TURK!

You are a comedian, do you actually get paid for sitting around constructing extremely unfounded posts that have no place for a real debate? They wont even pass as decent propaganda material, that's how untrue they are.

Either you are extremely stupid or extremely bored, i have said this before and it still stands.

Pantheman if you think the person (Paliometexo) that openly demands the death of ALL TURKS and contributes nothing but direct insults to other nations, is an angel compared to me, then you yourself are no better, i never actually thought you were any better but you have now openly admitted it yourself, which is great.

Keep it up and you might win a brownie from Piratis ;)
User avatar
shahmaran
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 5461
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 3:58 pm
Location: In conflict

Postby Kikapu » Fri Feb 22, 2008 12:48 pm

Halil,

You mean when some TC's march by saying "North is Turkish". !!!

In fact, isn't that what you said one time on the forum "The North is Turkish and that's where I live".

The answer to both sides wanting all Greek or all Turkish is a True Federation, since neither will get what they want, other than a North and South States with the majority being TC or GC, or else agree on a proportional land for each community and make a clean break with a clean Partition with a wall between the two sides to separate them. Why fuck around with a disguised partition with a BBF.

Her zamanki gibi gaza gelin.Ah bir kurtula bisen etkilerinden .Gercekleri göreceksin.


Halil, please do me a favour and say what you have to say to me in English, so that everyone understand what it is that you want to tell me.
Just for the record Halil, why is it wrong for me to think in a True Federation and a True Democracy. Where is the crime in that. Just because that is not your "cup of tea", and so be it, but do not ask others to accept anything less, just because it does not sit well with your BBF ideas.
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18050
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

Re: Barbaric Bisection Backlash! ....

Postby Oracle » Fri Feb 22, 2008 1:37 pm

Kikapu wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
Oracle wrote:Cyprus has been brutally bisected by belligerent Barbarians.

Nearly 50% is occupied by less than 1/5th of its population; bolstered by 40,000 Turkish troops.

The solution to this scenario by the blackmailing Turk-TCs, is a return to a besotted 1960’s Agreement.

Well why wouldn’t they behest for this? :roll:

This biased, beguiling bumph still retains for the 18% of TCs, 50% control.

Blatant Bisection!

I beseech a backlash to this bisection:

1. No brazen return to the blunders of the ‘60s.
2. Begin a bona fide, balanced solution for a whole Blended Cyprus.
3. Banish the borders bisecting Cyprus, and let us blend.

Phoenix, this must be the weirdest piece I have ever read in all my time on the forum. The choice of words, the inaccuracy of figures, and the vague and overly generalized message it delivers (or lack thereof), confirms that you're not political debate material… :(

ie: What's a "balanced solution"? It's anybody's guess. You say "Banish the borders..." ...sure but HOW?

Come on people, let's make this a little more interesting! :roll:



I agree with you there GR. Definitely no 'political debate material', just like me. I was going to tell her that I agree on all three points, then changed my mind in fear that she would change her mind also. We know that OrPh will under no circumstance will be in agreement with any TC, except perhaps Kikapu. :wink:


1. No brazen return to the blunders of the ‘60s.
2. Begin a bona fide, balanced solution for a whole Blended Cyprus.
3. Banish the borders bisecting Cyprus, and let us blend.


Deniz,

OrPh may well be refering to a "TRUE FEDERATION" with her above quote, which I support. Come to think of it, why doesn't other TC's support a "True Federation". We should give credit to OrPh for opening new chapters for Cyprus, as one country and non of this "two people, two language, two religion, two separate states (countries in disguise) and on and on with the TWO's.

It's beginning to sound more like Noah's Arch for god sake. :lol: :lol:

Image


I think where we differ Kikapu is that your system still allows for future disharmony. Whereas my vision requires a true blending of the people such that they are only distinguishable by personal preferences ...


Blend (the verb) expanded in meaning: To mix
Synonyms: amalgamate, cement, coalesce, combine, commingle, commix, compound, fuse, integrate, interblend, intermix, meld, merge, synthesize, unite, weld
Antonyms: divide, separate, unmix
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Re: Barbaric Bisection Backlash! ....

Postby denizaksulu » Fri Feb 22, 2008 1:39 pm

Oracle wrote:
Kikapu wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
Oracle wrote:Cyprus has been brutally bisected by belligerent Barbarians.

Nearly 50% is occupied by less than 1/5th of its population; bolstered by 40,000 Turkish troops.

The solution to this scenario by the blackmailing Turk-TCs, is a return to a besotted 1960’s Agreement.

Well why wouldn’t they behest for this? :roll:

This biased, beguiling bumph still retains for the 18% of TCs, 50% control.

Blatant Bisection!

I beseech a backlash to this bisection:

1. No brazen return to the blunders of the ‘60s.
2. Begin a bona fide, balanced solution for a whole Blended Cyprus.
3. Banish the borders bisecting Cyprus, and let us blend.

Phoenix, this must be the weirdest piece I have ever read in all my time on the forum. The choice of words, the inaccuracy of figures, and the vague and overly generalized message it delivers (or lack thereof), confirms that you're not political debate material… :(

ie: What's a "balanced solution"? It's anybody's guess. You say "Banish the borders..." ...sure but HOW?

Come on people, let's make this a little more interesting! :roll:



I agree with you there GR. Definitely no 'political debate material', just like me. I was going to tell her that I agree on all three points, then changed my mind in fear that she would change her mind also. We know that OrPh will under no circumstance will be in agreement with any TC, except perhaps Kikapu. :wink:


1. No brazen return to the blunders of the ‘60s.
2. Begin a bona fide, balanced solution for a whole Blended Cyprus.
3. Banish the borders bisecting Cyprus, and let us blend.


Deniz,

OrPh may well be refering to a "TRUE FEDERATION" with her above quote, which I support. Come to think of it, why doesn't other TC's support a "True Federation". We should give credit to OrPh for opening new chapters for Cyprus, as one country and non of this "two people, two language, two religion, two separate states (countries in disguise) and on and on with the TWO's.

It's beginning to sound more like Noah's Arch for god sake. :lol: :lol:

Image


I think where we differ Kikapu is that your system still allows for future disharmony. Whereas my vision requires a true blending of the people such that they are only distinguishable by personal preferences ...


Blend (the verb) expanded in meaning: To mix
Synonyms: amalgamate, cement, coalesce, combine, commingle, commix, compound, fuse, integrate, interblend, intermix, meld, merge, synthesize, unite, weld
Antonyms: divide, separate, unmix



Good God OrPh, I'd like to see you blend with Eric :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


There you go Kikapu, you have your answer from OrPh. Sort that one out. :wink: :wink:
User avatar
denizaksulu
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 36077
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 11:04 am

Re: Barbaric Bisection Backlash! ....

Postby Oracle » Fri Feb 22, 2008 1:45 pm

denizaksulu wrote:
Oracle wrote:
Kikapu wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
Oracle wrote:Cyprus has been brutally bisected by belligerent Barbarians.

Nearly 50% is occupied by less than 1/5th of its population; bolstered by 40,000 Turkish troops.

The solution to this scenario by the blackmailing Turk-TCs, is a return to a besotted 1960’s Agreement.

Well why wouldn’t they behest for this? :roll:

This biased, beguiling bumph still retains for the 18% of TCs, 50% control.

Blatant Bisection!

I beseech a backlash to this bisection:

1. No brazen return to the blunders of the ‘60s.
2. Begin a bona fide, balanced solution for a whole Blended Cyprus.
3. Banish the borders bisecting Cyprus, and let us blend.

Phoenix, this must be the weirdest piece I have ever read in all my time on the forum. The choice of words, the inaccuracy of figures, and the vague and overly generalized message it delivers (or lack thereof), confirms that you're not political debate material… :(

ie: What's a "balanced solution"? It's anybody's guess. You say "Banish the borders..." ...sure but HOW?

Come on people, let's make this a little more interesting! :roll:



I agree with you there GR. Definitely no 'political debate material', just like me. I was going to tell her that I agree on all three points, then changed my mind in fear that she would change her mind also. We know that OrPh will under no circumstance will be in agreement with any TC, except perhaps Kikapu. :wink:


1. No brazen return to the blunders of the ‘60s.
2. Begin a bona fide, balanced solution for a whole Blended Cyprus.
3. Banish the borders bisecting Cyprus, and let us blend.


Deniz,

OrPh may well be refering to a "TRUE FEDERATION" with her above quote, which I support. Come to think of it, why doesn't other TC's support a "True Federation". We should give credit to OrPh for opening new chapters for Cyprus, as one country and non of this "two people, two language, two religion, two separate states (countries in disguise) and on and on with the TWO's.

It's beginning to sound more like Noah's Arch for god sake. :lol: :lol:

Image


I think where we differ Kikapu is that your system still allows for future disharmony. Whereas my vision requires a true blending of the people such that they are only distinguishable by personal preferences ...


Blend (the verb) expanded in meaning: To mix
Synonyms: amalgamate, cement, coalesce, combine, commingle, commix, compound, fuse, integrate, interblend, intermix, meld, merge, synthesize, unite, weld
Antonyms: divide, separate, unmix



Good God OrPh, I'd like to see you blend with Eric :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


There you go Kikapu, you have your answer from OrPh. Sort that one out. :wink: :wink:


I am sure we would still be distinguishable by our personal preferences .... :wink:

That's normal and highly desirable in an interesting community.

You do not have to build barriers between people just because they have different personal preferences ........ :roll: :D
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby halil » Fri Feb 22, 2008 1:51 pm

Kikapu wrote:Halil,

You mean when some TC's march by saying "North is Turkish". !!!

In fact, isn't that what you said one time on the forum "The North is Turkish and that's where I live".

The answer to both sides wanting all Greek or all Turkish is a True Federation, since neither will get what they want, other than a North and South States with the majority being TC or GC, or else agree on a proportional land for each community and make a clean break with a clean Partition with a wall between the two sides to separate them. Why fuck around with a disguised partition with a BBF.

Her zamanki gibi gaza gelin.Ah bir kurtula bisen etkilerinden .Gercekleri göreceksin.


Halil, please do me a favour and say what you have to say to me in English, so that everyone understand what it is that you want to tell me.
Just for the record Halil, why is it wrong for me to think in a True Federation and a True Democracy. Where is the crime in that. Just because that is not your "cup of tea", and so be it, but do not ask others to accept anything less, just because it does not sit well with your BBF ideas.


Kikapu,
You can translate it Kikapu, İf i could , i could do it.
No one is stopping you to believe what you are believing. You should show your reactions to everybody if you are honest than i will clamp for you.
you should show your reaction when racist attacks are happening to Turkish Cypriots or other nations. When those things are keep going on you keep quite and finding many excuses .
Don't forget Kikapu , that ROC was forumed from partnership . İt wasn't like other republics in the world . İt wasn't based with majority and minorities rights. under this two side came together and forumed ex-ROC.
halil
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 8804
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:21 pm
Location: nicosia

Re: Barbaric Bisection Backlash! ....

Postby Oracle » Fri Feb 22, 2008 1:55 pm

halil wrote:
Oracle wrote:Cyprus has been brutally bisected by belligerent Barbarians.

Nearly 50% is occupied by less than 1/5th of its population; bolstered by 40,000 Turkish troops.

The solution to this scenario by the blackmailing Turk-TCs, is a return to a besotted 1960’s Agreement.

Well why wouldn’t they behest for this? :roll:

This biased, beguiling bumph still retains for the 18% of TCs, 50% control.

Blatant Bisection!

I beseech a backlash to this bisection:

1. No brazen return to the blunders of the ‘60s.
2. Begin a bona fide, balanced solution for a whole Blended Cyprus.
3. Banish the borders bisecting Cyprus, and let us blend.


STOP POSTİNG PROPAGANDA AND HATE


Image we all can see you :!: :twisted:


What's hateful about wanting people to blend...... :lol:
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Re: Barbaric Bisection Backlash! ....

Postby Kikapu » Fri Feb 22, 2008 1:57 pm

Oracle wrote:
Kikapu wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
Oracle wrote:Cyprus has been brutally bisected by belligerent Barbarians.

Nearly 50% is occupied by less than 1/5th of its population; bolstered by 40,000 Turkish troops.

The solution to this scenario by the blackmailing Turk-TCs, is a return to a besotted 1960’s Agreement.

Well why wouldn’t they behest for this? :roll:

This biased, beguiling bumph still retains for the 18% of TCs, 50% control.

Blatant Bisection!

I beseech a backlash to this bisection:

1. No brazen return to the blunders of the ‘60s.
2. Begin a bona fide, balanced solution for a whole Blended Cyprus.
3. Banish the borders bisecting Cyprus, and let us blend.

Phoenix, this must be the weirdest piece I have ever read in all my time on the forum. The choice of words, the inaccuracy of figures, and the vague and overly generalized message it delivers (or lack thereof), confirms that you're not political debate material… :(

ie: What's a "balanced solution"? It's anybody's guess. You say "Banish the borders..." ...sure but HOW?

Come on people, let's make this a little more interesting! :roll:



I agree with you there GR. Definitely no 'political debate material', just like me. I was going to tell her that I agree on all three points, then changed my mind in fear that she would change her mind also. We know that OrPh will under no circumstance will be in agreement with any TC, except perhaps Kikapu. :wink:


1. No brazen return to the blunders of the ‘60s.
2. Begin a bona fide, balanced solution for a whole Blended Cyprus.
3. Banish the borders bisecting Cyprus, and let us blend.


Deniz,

OrPh may well be refering to a "TRUE FEDERATION" with her above quote, which I support. Come to think of it, why doesn't other TC's support a "True Federation". We should give credit to OrPh for opening new chapters for Cyprus, as one country and non of this "two people, two language, two religion, two separate states (countries in disguise) and on and on with the TWO's.

It's beginning to sound more like Noah's Arch for god sake. :lol: :lol:

Image


I think where we differ Kikapu is that your system still allows for future disharmony. Whereas my vision requires a true blending of the people such that they are only distinguishable by personal preferences ...


Blend (the verb) expanded in meaning: To mix
Synonyms: amalgamate, cement, coalesce, combine, commingle, commix, compound, fuse, integrate, interblend, intermix, meld, merge, synthesize, unite, weld
Antonyms: divide, separate, unmix


I think where we differ Kikapu is that your system still allows for future disharmony. Whereas my vision requires a true blending of the people such that they are only distinguishable by personal preferences ...


Lets walk before we can run Oracle. :lol: :lol: :lol:

I would also like to see your vision come true, but one step at a time.

We have 50 States in the USA, and they do not have a concern with your concern which you said "I think where we differ Kikapu is that your system still allows for future disharmony". I don't think so. Anyone in the USA can pick up and move to any place they want to live, work or retire. Same can be true in Cyprus with a True Federation with North and South as two States with a strong central government which will be located in Nicosia DC (District of Cyprus).
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18050
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

Re: Barbaric Bisection Backlash! ....

Postby denizaksulu » Fri Feb 22, 2008 1:58 pm

Oracle wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
Oracle wrote:
Kikapu wrote:
denizaksulu wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
Oracle wrote:Cyprus has been brutally bisected by belligerent Barbarians.

Nearly 50% is occupied by less than 1/5th of its population; bolstered by 40,000 Turkish troops.

The solution to this scenario by the blackmailing Turk-TCs, is a return to a besotted 1960’s Agreement.

Well why wouldn’t they behest for this? :roll:

This biased, beguiling bumph still retains for the 18% of TCs, 50% control.

Blatant Bisection!

I beseech a backlash to this bisection:

1. No brazen return to the blunders of the ‘60s.
2. Begin a bona fide, balanced solution for a whole Blended Cyprus.
3. Banish the borders bisecting Cyprus, and let us blend.

Phoenix, this must be the weirdest piece I have ever read in all my time on the forum. The choice of words, the inaccuracy of figures, and the vague and overly generalized message it delivers (or lack thereof), confirms that you're not political debate material… :(

ie: What's a "balanced solution"? It's anybody's guess. You say "Banish the borders..." ...sure but HOW?

Come on people, let's make this a little more interesting! :roll:



I agree with you there GR. Definitely no 'political debate material', just like me. I was going to tell her that I agree on all three points, then changed my mind in fear that she would change her mind also. We know that OrPh will under no circumstance will be in agreement with any TC, except perhaps Kikapu. :wink:


1. No brazen return to the blunders of the ‘60s.
2. Begin a bona fide, balanced solution for a whole Blended Cyprus.
3. Banish the borders bisecting Cyprus, and let us blend.


Deniz,

OrPh may well be refering to a "TRUE FEDERATION" with her above quote, which I support. Come to think of it, why doesn't other TC's support a "True Federation". We should give credit to OrPh for opening new chapters for Cyprus, as one country and non of this "two people, two language, two religion, two separate states (countries in disguise) and on and on with the TWO's.

It's beginning to sound more like Noah's Arch for god sake. :lol: :lol:

Image


I think where we differ Kikapu is that your system still allows for future disharmony. Whereas my vision requires a true blending of the people such that they are only distinguishable by personal preferences ...


Blend (the verb) expanded in meaning: To mix
Synonyms: amalgamate, cement, coalesce, combine, commingle, commix, compound, fuse, integrate, interblend, intermix, meld, merge, synthesize, unite, weld
Antonyms: divide, separate, unmix



Good God OrPh, I'd like to see you blend with Eric :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


There you go Kikapu, you have your answer from OrPh. Sort that one out. :wink: :wink:


I am sure we would still be distinguishable by our personal preferences .... :wink:

That's normal and highly desirable in an interesting community.

You do not have to build barriers between people just because they have different personal preferences ........ :roll: :D



OrPh, in my book there are no barriers between me and any other Cypriot bar the barriers you and your type are trying to create. So dont give that .... :roll: :roll:
User avatar
denizaksulu
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 36077
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 11:04 am

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest