Cyprus-Forum.com

[Oracle]

Just like i thought Phoenix, ZILCH!

Your silence and evasiveness speaks for itself.
Just get back to starting meaningless racist threads that depend on unfounded crap which you are full of and entertain the boys, its what you are only good at.

I was answering DT.'s post

[Oracle]

Cyprus has been brutally bisected by belligerent Barbarians.

Nearly 50% is occupied by less than 1/5th of its population; bolstered by 40,000 Turkish troops.

The solution to this scenario by the blackmailing Turk-TCs, is a return to a besotted 1960’s Agreement.

Well why wouldn’t they behest for this?

This biased, beguiling bumph still retains for the 18% of TCs, 50% control.

Blatant Bisection!

I beseech a backlash to this bisection:

1. No brazen return to the blunders of the ‘60s.
2. Begin a bona fide, balanced solution for a whole Blended Cyprus.
3. Banish the borders bisecting Cyprus, and let us blend.

Phoenix, this must be the weirdest piece I have ever read in all my time on the forum. The choice of words, the inaccuracy of figures, and the vague and overly generalized message it delivers (or lack thereof), confirms that you're not political debate material…

ie: What's a "balanced solution"? It's anybody's guess. You say "Banish the borders..." ...sure but HOW?

Come on people, let's make this a little more interesting!

Sorry ... I've been listening to too many political speeches recently and the inaccuracies and gross generalisations may have unduly influenced me.

[repulsewarrior]

Cyprus has been brutally bisected by belligerent Barbarians.

Nearly 50% is occupied by less than 1/5th of its population; bolstered by 40,000 Turkish troops.

The solution to this scenario by the blackmailing Turk-TCs, is a return to a besotted 1960’s Agreement.

Well why wouldn’t they behest for this?

This biased, beguiling bumph still retains for the 18% of TCs, 50% control.

Blatant Bisection!

I beseech a backlash to this bisection:

1. No brazen return to the blunders of the ‘60s.
2. Begin a bona fide, balanced solution for a whole Blended Cyprus.
3. Banish the borders bisecting Cyprus, and let us blend.

Phoenix, this must be the weirdest piece I have ever read in all my time on the forum. The choice of words, the inaccuracy of figures, and the vague and overly generalized message it delivers (or lack thereof), confirms that you're not political debate material…

ie: What's a "balanced solution"? It's anybody's guess. You say "Banish the borders..." ...sure but HOW?

Come on people, let's make this a little more interesting!

Sorry ... I've been listening to too many political speeches recently and the inaccuracies and gross generalisations may have unduly influenced me.

...now that's funny, and honest.

thank-you.

[repulsewarrior]

...shah, i understand you, and your pain. reread your posts, please.

[repulsewarrior]

...blending; to me it means something like osmosis. two parts (made fluid), a barrier; and through which they pass.

and on thinking about it, blending; knifed or whipped.

blending: two National Assemblies (as well), one State; Bicommunal.
blending: many components (geographically), two parts; Bizonal.

But Barbaric Bisection Backlash is indeed what we are facing, if like Bozos we Bamboozle ourselves into Believing we are Bouncing Boxers to Be real. There is one enemy we can fight, and that is the ignorance we expel when we Bhey which allows us to focus on the misery, finding pleasure from its pain.

days ago i asked the members to join me, and to pick apart my proposal perspicaciously. ...but you guys just won't relax.

i'll invite you to make your own proposal in my next post, too.

[Natty]

Oracle I don't think you can claim every action by the GC's was self-defence, what about those 'highly intelligent' GC's who attacked for the sake of attacking?

[Oracle]

Oracle I don't think you can claim every action by the GC's was self-defence, what about those 'highly intelligent' GC's who attacked for the sake of attacking?

Who were these oddballs?

BTW ... I don't think I made such a claim .... sick people exist.

[Natty]

Oracle I don't think you can claim every action by the GC's was self-defence, what about those 'highly intelligent' GC's who attacked for the sake of attacking?

BTW ... I don't think I made such a claim .... sick people exist.

Well you did say...

Any actions by GCs against TCs were purely in defence.

So I presumed that you meant all actions, which include the actions of those few sick people...but I apologise if I interpreted what you said incorrectly..

Who were these oddballs?

Very bad people who did Cyprus no favours what so ever...

[Oracle]

Oracle I don't think you can claim every action by the GC's was self-defence, what about those 'highly intelligent' GC's who attacked for the sake of attacking?

BTW ... I don't think I made such a claim .... sick people exist.

Well you did say...

Any actions by GCs against TCs were purely in defence.

So I presumed that you meant all actions, which include the actions of those few sick people...but I apologise if I interpreted what you said incorrectly..

Who were these oddballs?

Very bad people who did Cyprus no favours what so ever...

In the context of my exchange with shah ... any meant as in the legitimate response to the Turk-TC massacres etc under discussion ... otherwise I would have said each and every or all .

So then, who were these bad people? ... do you know of any specific ones?

[repulsewarrior]

Cyprus has been brutally bisected by belligerent Barbarians.

Nearly 50% is occupied by less than 1/5th of its population; bolstered by 40,000 Turkish troops.

The solution to this scenario by the blackmailing Turk-TCs, is a return to a besotted 1960’s Agreement.

Well why wouldn’t they behest for this?

This biased, beguiling bumph still retains for the 18% of TCs, 50% control.

Blatant Bisection!

I beseech a backlash to this bisection:

1. No brazen return to the blunders of the ‘60s.
2. Begin a bona fide, balanced solution for a whole Blended Cyprus.
3. Banish the borders bisecting Cyprus, and let us blend.

Phoenix, this must be the weirdest piece I have ever read in all my time on the forum. The choice of words, the inaccuracy of figures, and the vague and overly generalized message it delivers (or lack thereof), confirms that you're not political debate material…

ie: What's a "balanced solution"? It's anybody's guess. You say "Banish the borders..." ...sure but HOW?

Come on people, let's make this a little more interesting!

...your comments, on my proposal I would like, again.