Kikapu wrote:Filitsa wrote:Kikapu wrote:Since JFK broke the "Catholic religion barrier", perhaps we will see Obama break the "Black barrier". Someone else other than Hillary is going to have to break the "women barrier", because she has started to act like a Bitch lately.
Then again, a "Bitch" will fit nicely in with all those characters I mentioned in my first paragraph.
Can Hillary break the "Bitch" barrier.?
In any case, there is definitely going to be a very loud BOOMS, as soon as new "barriers" are broken.
I can't wait to hear the Double BOOMS when the "Gay barrier" is broken for the White House...............in year 5000.
"Bitch"?! What's up with this?! When male politicians engage in mud-slinging, it's called "bashing the opponent." When the one-and-only female presidential hopeful in the history of the country does it, she's labled a "bitch" ... and this coming from a man (you are a man, aren't you?)! Yup, the old double-standard is alive an well.
I was not condemning her for being "bitchy" at all, but she wanted to run a "clean" campaign until she realise that
"nice guys finish last". :lol:
I still think Obama will keep his cool and not resort to being a "bastard" towards Hillary, although she would love for him to take the "low road".
I am a man and Hillary is my second choice after Obama for the presidency.
Perhaps you're not "condemning" her, but certainly criticizing her with the derrogatory, male chauvanistically imposed label of "bitch." If her behavior is that of a "bitch," then why not label all politicians who engage in the same behavior as "bitches"? How often were the mud-slinging kings Guiliani and Romney referred to as "bitches"?
Let me clarify that, despite not condoning the label "bitch," I'm neither condoning her uncomely strategy. I respect Obama for keeping his nose clean ... or as you put it, refraining from being a "bastard" (like giving equal time to this label makes the use of the other one any better! I'm on to you, my friend)